The FTC should
consider comments received regarding the information collection
instrument(s) and provide a response and any necessary adjustments
in its next submission to OMB.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/2013
36 Months From Approved
04/30/2013
1,123,956
0
1,123,956
38,469
0
38,469
426,250
0
426,250
The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC")
proposes amendments to the Alternative Fuels Rule to consolidate
the FTC's alternative fueled vehicle ("AFV") labels with new fuel
economy labels required by the Environmental Protection Agency and
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and eliminate
FTC requirements for used AFV labels.
Statute at
Large: 106
Stat. 2776 Name of Statute: Energy Policy Act of 1992
The FTC has identified EPA fuel
labeling requirements that duplicate existing requirements. Thus,
the FTC is proposing to consolidate its requirements with those of
EPA. The FTC believes that the proposed rule would eliminate the
Rule's PRA burden for disclosure and reporting aspects for
manufacturers of alternative fueled vehicles. Thus, the burden
reduction submitted for approval totals the previously assigned
estimates of 37,389 hours and $426,038 in estimated label costs
regarding those manufacturers.
$0
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Hampton Newsome 202 326-2889
hnewsome@ftc.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.