76FR30318 1024-0018 30-Day FRN Renewal 05222012

76FR30318 1024-0018 30-Day FRN Renewal 05222012.pdf

Nomination of Properties for Listing in the National Register of Historic Places, 36 CFR 60 and 63

76FR30318 1024-0018 30-Day FRN Renewal 05222012

OMB: 1024-0018

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
30318

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2012 / Notices

AGENCY:

Officer, National Park Service, 1849 C
Street NW., Mailstop 2605 (Rm. 1242),
Washington, DC 20240 (mail); or
madonna_baucum@nps.gov (email).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Deline, NPS Historian, National Register
of Historic Places, 1201 Eye St. NW.,
20005. You may send an email to
Lisa_Deline@nps.gov or contact her by
telephone at (202/354–2239) or via fax
at (202/371–2229).

ACTION:

I. Abstract

We (National Park Service)
will ask the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve the
information collection request (ICR)
described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this ICR
which is an extension of a currently
approved collection of information
(OMB #1024–0018). We may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
on this ICR are considered, please
submit them on or before June 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Please submit written
comments on this information
collection directly to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior via email to
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov or fax at
202–395–5806; and identify your
submission as 1024–0018, Nomination
of Properties for Listing in the National
Register of Historic Places, 36 CFR 60
and 63. Please send a copy your
comments to Madonna L. Baucum,
Acting Information Collection Clearance

The National Register of Historic
Places (National Register) is the official
Federal list of districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects significant in
American history, architecture,
archeology, engineering, and culture.
National Register properties have
significance to the history of
communities, states, or the Nation. The
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 requires the Secretary of the
Interior to maintain and expand the
National Register, and to establish
criteria and guidelines for including
properties on the National Register.
National Register properties must be
considered in the planning for Federal
or federally assisted projects, and listing
on the National Register is required for
eligibility for Federal rehabilitation tax
incentives.
The National Park Service administers
the National Register. Nominations for
listing historic properties come from
State Historic Preservation Officers,
from Federal Preservation Officers for
properties owned or controlled by the
United States Government, and from
Tribal Historic Preservation Officers for
properties on tribal lands. Private
individuals and organizations, local
governments, and American Indian
tribes often initiate this process and
prepare the necessary documentation.
Regulations at 36 CFR parts 60 and 63
establish the criteria and guidelines for
listing properties.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–CR–10268; 2200–3200–665]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: 30-Day Notice of Intention
To Request Clearance of Collection of
Information; Opportunity for Public
Comment
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice and request for
comments.

SUMMARY:

We use three forms for nominating
properties and providing documentation
for the proposed listings:
• NPS Form 10–900 (National
Register of Historic Places Registration
Form).
• NPS Form 10–900–a (National
Register of Historic Places Continuation
Sheet).
• NPS Form 10–900–b (National
Register of Historic Places Multiple
Property Documentation Form).
These forms and documentation go to
the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) of the state where the property
is located. The SHPO can take one of
several options: reject the property, ask
for more information, list the property
just with the state, or send the forms to
us for listing on the National Register.
Once we receive the forms, we conduct
a similar review process.
Listing on the National Register
provides formal recognition of a
property’s historical, architectural, or
archeological significance based on
national standards used by every state.
The listing places no obligations on
private property owners, and there are
no restrictions on the use, treatment,
transfer, or disposition of private
property.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–0018.
Title: Nomination of Properties for
Listing in the National Register of
Historic Places, 36 CFR 60 and 63.
Form(s): 10–900, 10–900–a, and 10–
900–b.
Type of Request: Extension of a
previously approved collection of
information.
Description of Respondents: State,
tribal, and local governments; and
individuals.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Total annual
responses

Avg. time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
burden hours

36 CFR 60 and 63, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form; Continuation Sheet; NR Multiple Property Documentation
Form
Individuals or Households ...........................................................................................................

15

250

3,750

417

100

41,700

50

900

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Individual and District Nominations (Forms 10–900 and 10–900–a)
State, Local, and Tribal Governments .........................................................................................

Existing Multiple Property Submission (Forms 10–900 and 10–900–a)
State, Local, and Tribal Governments .........................................................................................

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:20 May 21, 2012

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM

18

22MYN1

30319

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2012 / Notices
Avg. time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
responses

Total annual
burden hours

Newly Proposed MPS Cover Document (Forms 10–900-b and 10–900–a)
State, Local, and Tribal Governments .........................................................................................

15

150

2,250

Individuals or Households ...........................................................................................................

417

150

62,550

Totals: ...................................................................................................................................

882

........................

111,150

New Nominations (Forms 10–900 and 10–900–a)

III. Request for Comments

Dated: May 17, 2012.
Robert M. Gordon,
Manager, Washington Administrative
Program Center, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–12371 Filed 5–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

[NPS–SER–FOPU–07794; 5017–7187–409]

Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for General Management Plan, Fort
Pulaski National Monument, GA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability of the
Draft General Management Plan,
Wilderness Study, and Environmental
Impact Statement.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:20 May 21, 2012

Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park
Service (NPS) announces the
availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the General
Management Plan (GMP) and
Wilderness Study for Fort Pulaski
National Monument (monument).
Consistent with NPS laws,
regulations, and policies and the
purpose of the monument, the DEIS/
GMP/Wilderness Study describes three
alternatives including the NPS preferred
alternative—Alternative B—to guide the
management of the monument over the
next 15 to 20 years. The preferred
alternative incorporates various
management prescriptions to ensure
protection, access and enjoyment of the
monument’s resources.
An up-to-date GMP is needed to
address how visitors access and use the
monument and the facilities needed to
support those uses, how resources are
managed, and how the NPS manages its
operations. Recent studies have
enhanced the NPS’s understanding of
resources, resource threats, and visitor
use in the monument.
DATES: The NPS will accept comments
from the public on the DEIS/GMP for at
least 60 days, starting from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the Notice of Availability and
ending 3 to 4 weeks after public
meetings conclude. The date, time, and
location of the public meetings will be
announced through the NPS Planning,
Environment, and Public Comment
(PEPC) Web site: http://
parkplanning.nps.gov/FOPU and media
outlets.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
draft DEIS/GMP/Wilderness Study will
be available online at http://
parkplanning.nps.gov/FOPU. To request
a copy, contact Fort Pulaski National
Monument, Superintendent Randy
Wester, P.O. Box 30757, Highway 80
East, Savannah, GA 31410–0757. A
limited number of compact disks and
printed copies of the DEIS/GMP will be
made available at Fort Pulaski National
SUMMARY:

We invite comments concerning this
ICR on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Please note that the comments
submitted in response to this notice are
a matter of public record. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Monument headquarters, P.O. Box
30757, Highway 80 East, Savannah, GA
31410–0757.
Comments may be submitted by
several methods. The preferred method
is commenting via the Internet on the
PEPC Web site, http://
parkplanning.nps.gov/FOPU. An
electronic public comment form is
provided on this Web site. You may also
mail comments to Superintendent, P.O.
Box 30757, Highway 80 East, Savannah,
GA 31410–0757. Finally, you may handdeliver comments to the monument.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be aware that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will always make
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives of or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public
meetings, newsletters, and Internet
updates have kept the public informed
and involved throughout the planning
process. The DEIS/GMP/Wilderness
study provides a framework for
management, use, and development of
the monument for the next 15 to 20
years. It presents and analyzes three
alternatives: Alternative A (no action)
provides a baseline for evaluating
changes and impacts of the three action
alternatives. Alternative B would focus
management on the April 1862 period of
significance in terms of the landscape
and interpretive programs. This
alternative includes landscape
restoration and interpretation of the
construction village. Alternative B is the
NPS Preferred Alternative. The concept
for management under alternative C is
to manage the monument with a much

E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM

22MYN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2012-05-21
File Created2012-05-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy