OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided. Resubmit
when proposed rule is finalized.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
02/28/2013
02/28/2013
02/28/2013
5,124
0
5,124
161,128
0
161,128
5,577,265
0
5,577,265
The United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register, Changes to Implement the Supplemental Examination
Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and to Revise
Reexamination Fees (RIN 0651-AC69). In the notice, the USPTO
proposes to amend the rules of practice in patent cases to
implement the supplemental examination provisions of section 12 of
the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, which was enacted into law on
September 16, 2011. See Pub. L. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011). The
supplemental examination provisions permit a patent owner to
request supplemental examination of a patent by the USPTO to
consider, reconsider, or correct information believed to be
relevant to the patent. These provisions could assist the patent
owner in addressing certain challenges to the enforceability of the
patent during litigation. The USPTO is also proposing to set
certain fees to implement supplemental examination, to adjust the
fee for filing a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination, and to set a
fee for petitions filed in reexamination proceedings to more
accurately reflect the cost of these processes. In support of the
proposed rulemaking, the USPTO is submitting this information
collection to add new information requirements and update existing
information requirements that would be impacted by the proposed
rulemaking. The public will use this information collection to
request supplemental examination and reexamination proceedings and
to ensure that the associated fees and documentation are submitted
to the USPTO.
Program changes in responses
and burden hours are primarily due to the addition of Requests for
Supplemental Examination and its impact on Requests for Ex Parte
Reexamination and related items, as well as the addition of
Petitions Under 37 CFR 1.182 and 1.183 being included under the
renamed information requirement of Petitions in a Reexamination
Proceeding (except for those specifically enumerated in 37 CFR
1.550(i) and 1.937(d)). Administrative adjustments to responses and
burden hours are primarily due to revised time estimates for
submitting Requests for Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexamination as
discussed further in the published Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
and supporting statement. Program changes in annual (non-hour) cost
burden are primarily due to the addition of fees for Requests for
Supplemental Examination, increases in the fee amounts for Requests
for Ex Parte Reexamination and Petitions in a Reexamination
Proceeding (except for those specifically enumerated in 37 CFR
1.550(i) and 1.937(d)), and increases in responses and the
associated total fees for Petitions to Request Extension of Time in
Ex Parte or Inter Partes Reexaminations. Administrative adjustments
to annual (non-hour) cost burden are due to decreases in total
postage costs based on an expected increase in the percentage of
responses that are submitted electronically.
$560,660
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Raul Tamayo 5712727728
Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.