Download:
pdf |
pdfAccreditation Services
Customer Survey
OMB No. 0693-0031
Expires: 2012-02-29
This collection of information contains Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requirements approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Notwithstanding any other provisions of the
law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA unless that
collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to be 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Attn: Vanda White,
vanda.white@nist.gov, 301-975-3592.
Thank you for selecting NVLAP to provide accreditation services to your laboratory. We would appreciate your
taking some time to let us know how satisfied you are with your recent accreditation services. Please answer the
questions below and return this survey in the postage-paid envelope.
1. Why did you choose NVLAP for this accreditation?
Regulatory requirement
Reputation / quality of service
Previous experience with NVLAP
Procurement requirement
Cost
Other (please specify) _________________________
Did not meet
expectations
Met some
expectations
Met
expectations
Exceeded some
expectations
Exceeded all
expectations
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
a. Courtesy of NVLAP phone personnel
1
2
3
4
5
b. Ease of application process
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
e. Timely processing of accreditation
1
2
3
4
5
f. Accuracy of certificate and scope of
accreditation
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
1
2
3
4
5
Unlikely
Somewhat
unlikely
Neither unlikely
nor likely
Somewhat likely
Very likely
1
2
3
4
5
Very dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neither
dissatisfied nor
satisfied
Satisfied
Very Satisfied
1
2
3
4
5
2. To what extent did this accreditation
experience meet your expectations?
3. Please rate your satisfaction with
each of the following service areas:
c. Responsiveness of NVLAP program
manager
d. Quality of proficiency testing program
(if applicable)
4. How would you rate the value of
NVLAP accreditation relative to its
cost?
5. Based on this specific experience, how
likely are you to renew your NVLAP
accreditation?
6. Overall, how satisfied are you with
this accreditation experience?
7. How can NVLAP improve its accreditation service to you?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Please enter the field of accreditation for this transaction:
Asbestos PLM
Construction
NTRMs
Asbestos TEM
Cryptographic & Security
Personal Body Armor
Acoustics
Dosimetry
Radiation Detection Inst.
Biometrics Testing
Electric Motors
Thermal Insulation
Calibration
Elec. Com. & Telecom.
Voting
Carpet & Cushion
Energy Eff. Lighting
Wood Based Products
Common Criteria
Fasteners & Metals
9. The following information is optional:
Laboratory Name: ___________________________________________
NVLAP Lab Code: ___________________________________________
Your Name: ________________________________________________
Your Phone Number: _________________________________________
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR EVALUATION WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
Rev. 2011-11-17
File Type | application/pdf |
Author | NVLAP |
File Modified | 2011-11-22 |
File Created | 2011-11-18 |