GCCE Prior Awardee Closeout Questionnaire

GCCE Awardee Closeout Questionnaire

INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire uses the Microsoft Word Forms formatting to allow you to fill in answers in each space provided. For each question, place the cursor in the field you wish to complete and check a box, select an answer, or begin typing, as appropriate. When completed, save the filled-in version to your hard drive and email it to the program evaluator, Ann Martin (ann.m.martin@nasa.gov).

Reflecting on GCCE

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = not at all and 5 = very, please answer the following questions:

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
How effective was communication from the GCCE management team at NASA Langley?
How effective was communication from the Virginia Space Grant Consortium (VSGC)?
How difficult was the reporting process?
How difficult was it to implement the OEPM surveys?
How useful is the GCCE website?
How difficult is the GCCE website to navigate and use?
How helpful were the GCCE webinars?
How well were you able to connect or develop relationships with the climate change education community at large, including NOAA and NSF project PIs?
How effectively did the GCCE management team connect you to networking with other NASA staff, if necessary, from NASA Earth Science and/or the Office of Education?
How difficult was the NASA Educational Produce Review process?
How useful were the PI meetings?

12. Select the option that best represents your view of the PI meetings.

	The PI meetings leave a significant carbon footprint, but the face-to-face experience is valuable enough to make up for that.
	The PI meetings leave a significant carbon footprint, and the face-to-face experience is not valuable enough to be worth that cost.
	The PI meetings do not leave a significant carbon footprint, and are valuable/worthwhile.
	The PI meetings do not leave a significant carbon footprint, but are not valuable/worthwhile.

13. Consider your answers to Questions 1 and 2 about the effectiveness of communication from the management team. What was useful? What recommendations could improve it?

Enter response here.

14. Consider your answers to Questions 5 and 6 about the website. What changes could we make to the GCCE website that would improve its usability?

Enter response here.

15. Consider your answer to Question 7 about the GCCE webinars. What would you change about the webinars?

Enter response here.

16. Consider your answer to Questions 11 and 12 about the PI meetings. Do you have any suggestions for making these meetings more meaningful?

Enter response here.