60-Day Notice

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices
streetcar line and would not provide
transit connections to the Fort Mason
Center.
Alternative 2 (agency-preferred)
would extend the existing F–Line from
Fisherman’s Wharf to the Fort Mason
Center. Included are new rail track and
associated new platforms and
designated stops; retrofitting of the
historic State Belt Railroad tunnel; and
a turnaround loop. The track extension
would include a street-running segment
along Beach Street, a transition zone
between the street-running segment and
the Fort Mason Tunnel segment. Two
‘‘turnaround segment’’ options for the
terminus—North Loop (Fort Mason
parking lot) and South Loop (Great
Meadow)—were analyzed during a
Value Analysis (VA) workshop held in
August of 2010. The VA team focused
on: (1) Identifying a ‘‘preferred’’
alternative for the streetcar extension
turnaround; (2) identifying
opportunities to improve value for the
project; and (3) confirming sustainable
project goals for the NPS. The VA team
rated the North Loop turnaround option
higher than three variations of the South
Loop turnaround option. Other specific
project elements include constructing
streetcar track for approximately 0.85
miles, construction of 8–9-station
platforms, upgrades to the existing Fort
Mason Tunnel, and installation of
signals, crossings, wires and poles.
Comments: This notice serves to
formally open the public review and
comment phase for the Draft EIS. The
public and interested organizations are
encouraged to provide written
comments on issues and concerns,
refinements in alternatives, potential
environmental effects and appropriate
mitigation measures that would reduce
potential impacts. To afford an
opportunity to obtain information, a
public open house will be hosted on
April 20, 2011 from 7–9 p.m. in the
Golden Gate Room, Building A, Fort
Mason (for directions or information
about public transit, please consult the
project Web site or contact the Muni
Railway Extension Project Manager at
(415) 561–2872). All written comments
must be postmarked or transmitted not
later than 60 days after publication of
the EPA’s notice of filing in the Federal
Register—as soon as this ending date is
confirmed it will be announced on the
project Web site.
The project Web site http://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
StreetcarExtension provides the most
up-to-date information regarding the
project, including electronic version of
the Draft EIS, planning process updates,
meeting notices, reports and documents,
and useful links associated with the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:11 Mar 21, 2011

Jkt 223001

project. Written comments on the Draft
EIS should be mailed to the following
address: Superintendent—GGNRA,
Attn: Rick Foster, Muni Railway
Extension Project Manager, Fort Mason,
Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA 94123. In
addition to the project Web site,
requests for printed copy of the Draft
EIS or to be included on the project
mailing list can be accommodated by
contacting the Muni Railway Extension
Project Manager at (415) 561–2872.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Decision Process: Availability of the
Draft EIS for a 60-days public review
will be formally announced through
publication of this Notice of
Availability, through local and regional
news media, via the project Web site,
and direct mailing to the project mailing
list. Following due consideration of all
public and agency comments, a Final
EIS will be prepared. As a delegated EIS
the official responsible for the final
decision regarding the proposed
extension is the Regional Director,
Pacific West Region. Subsequently the
officials responsible for implementation
will be the Superintendents of Golden
Gate National Recreation Area and San
Francisco Maritime National Historical
Park.
Dated: March 15, 2011.
Christine S. Lehnertz,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2011–6704 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The Bureau of Reclamation
(we, our, or us) intends to seek renewal
of the following approved information
collection set to expire on August 31,
2011: Recreation Visitor Use Surveys.
We will use several distinct forms to

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

15997

collect different types of recreation
information. Before submitting the
information collection request—OMB
No. 1006–0028—to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
renewal, we are soliciting comments on
specific aspects of the information
collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments
concerning this notice to Bureau of
Reclamation, Office of Policy and
Administration, Attention: Jerome
Jackson (84–53000), P.O. Box 25007,
Denver, CO 80225–0007, or via e-mail at
jljackson@usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or a copy of the
proposed collection of information
forms, contact Jerome Jackson at 303–
445–2712.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this notice announces that we
are requesting approval for the
collection of data from recreational
users of our lands and waterbodies.
To meet our needs for the collection
of visitor use data, we will be requesting
that OMB reauthorize a two-part
request.
The first part of the request provides
us with a set of 11 pre-approved
questionnaires to be administered as
approved by OMB. The second part of
the request consists of OMB and the
Bureau of Reclamation agreeing upon a
process whereby we custom design a
survey instrument to fit a specific
situation or area. The custom designed
survey would be created by extracting
questions from the approved
questionnaires as applicable to the area
and issue being evaluated. Only
questions included in the pre-approved
questionnaires will be used. We will
then submit the new survey form to
OMB for expedited approval.
Title: Recreation Visitor Use Surveys.
Abstract: The Bureau of Reclamation
is responsible for recreation
development at all of its reservoirs.
Presently, there are 289 designated
recreation areas on our lands within the
17 Western States. We must be able to
respond to emerging trends, changes in
the demographic profile of users,
changing values, needs, wants, desires,
and conflicts between user groups.
Statistically valid and up-to-date data
derived from users is essential to
developing and providing recreation
programs relevant to today’s visitor.
Respondents: Respondents to the
surveys will be members of the public
engaged in recreational activities on our

E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM

22MRN1

15998

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices

lands. Several surveys target people
engaged in various activities such as
boating on a specific lake or camping at
a developed campground.
Visitors will primarily consist of local
residents, those from large metropolitan

areas in the vicinity of the lake/
reservoir, and those from out of state.
Frequency: Varies by survey.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 7,531

Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.0
Estimated Total of Annual Responses:
7,531
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours on Respondents: 2,043

ESTIMATE OF BURDEN FOR EACH FORM
Burden estimate per survey
(in minutes)

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

Survey instrument

Number of
surveys
(times/yr.)

Number of respondents per
survey

Total estimated number
of respondents

Total annual
hour burden

Marina Survey ......................................................................
Campground Survey ............................................................
River Instream Flow Survey ................................................
Reservoir Preferred Water Level Survey .............................
Lake/River Visit Expenditure Survey ...................................
Recreation Activities Survey ................................................
Recreation Management Survey .........................................
Recreation Fee Survey ........................................................
Recreation Development Survey .........................................
Water Level Impacts on Recreation Boating Use ...............
River Recreation Quality Survey .........................................
Customized Surveys ............................................................

10
25
20
15
15
15
15
10
15
10
20
20

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
5

278
278
278
278
278
278
278
581
278
278
278
278

556
556
556
556
556
556
556
581
556
556
556
1,390

93
232
185
139
139
139
139
97
139
93
185
463

Totals ............................................................................

........................

........................

........................

7,531

2,043

Comments:
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
(b) The accuracy of our estimated time
and cost burdens of the proposed
collection of information, including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, use,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including increased use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
We will summarize all comments
received regarding this notice. We will
publish that summary in the Federal
Register after the information collection
is submitted to OMB for review and
renewal.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:11 Mar 21, 2011

Jkt 223001

Dated: March 9, 2011.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–6631 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Clean Water Act
Notice is hereby given that on March
14, 2011, a proposed consent decree in
United States v. Consol Energy, Inc., et
al., Civil Action No. 1:11–cv–00028,
was lodged with the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of West Virginia.
The proposed Consent Decree will
resolve claims alleged in this action by
the United States and the State of West
Virginia as a plaintiff-intervenor against
Consol Energy, Inc., Consolidation Coal
Company, and Windsor Coal Company,
for the discharge of pollutants into
waters of the United States in violation
of Section 301 of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
1311, and in violation of the conditions
and limitations of National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System
(‘‘NPDES’’) permits issued by the State
pursuant to Section 402 of the Act, 33
U.S.C. 1342. Under the proposed
Consent Decree, Defendants will
perform injunctive relief with two
components. To address four mines
with discharges into the Monongahela
Basin, Defendants will construct a
wastewater treatment system, including
a pipeline system, treatment plant, and

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

landfill. To address two mines with
discharges into the Ohio River Basin,
Defendants will relocate the discharges
pursuant to the appropriate permitting
process. In addition, Consol will pay a
civil penalty of $5.5 million.
The Department of Justice will accept
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree for a period of thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
notice. Comments should be addressed
to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and mailed either
electronically to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or in hard copy to
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Comments should refer to United States
v. Consol Energy, Inc., et al., Civil No.
1:11–cv–00028 (N.D.W.Va.) and D.J.
Reference No. 90–5–1–1–09916/1.
The proposed consent decree may be
examined at the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(Region 3), 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103. During the
comment period, the proposed consent
decree may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site: http://www.justice.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
proposed consent decree may also be
obtained by mail from the Department
of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611
or by faxing or e-mailing a request to
Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation

E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM

22MRN1