Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A(“Improving Teacher Quality State Grants – Subgrants to LEAs”) |
|
|
Form completed by: Name:
Position:
Phone:
Email: |
Purpose of this survey: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, provides funds to districts to improve the quality of their teaching and principal force and raise student achievement. These funds are provided to districts through Title II, Part A (“Improving Teacher Quality State Grants – Subgrants to LEAs”). The purpose of this survey is for the U.S. Department of Education to have a better understanding of how districts are using these funds. Please provide your assistance by completing this survey and returning it in the envelope provided. For more information on Title II, Part A and how LEAs can use these funds, see www.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/guidance.doc.
Instructions: All districts should complete Question 1 below. Complete questions 2-7 if your district received program funds for the 2011-12 school year. Use the enclosed envelope to return your completed survey to:
Elizabeth Dabney, Westat
1650 Research Blvd, Room RA1227
Rockville, MD 20850
FAX (301) 294-4475
1. Did your district receive Title II, Part A funding in 2011-12? |
|
|
If you checked “yes,” continue to question 2 (next page). |
|
If you checked “no,” you do not need to complete this survey. Return this survey in the enclosed envelope. |
According
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to
respond to a collection of information unless such collection
displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for
this collection of information is estimated to average 5.5 hours per
response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The
obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington,
DC 20210-4537 or email
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov
and reference
the OMB Control Number 1810-0618. Note: Please do not return the
completed XXXX (cite form or other applicable reporting mechanism)
application to this address.”
2. Provide the dollar amount of 2011-12 Title II, Part A funds allocated for the following activities (do not include carryover funds). You can estimate if you do not have exact figures. |
Title II, Part A Funds |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
(e.g., National Board Certification support, mentoring and induction programs, exemplary teacher programs) |
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
|
$____________ |
|
||
Which Title were funds transferred to? ____________________ |
$____________ |
|
||
|
Total 2011-12 Title II, Part A funds allocated (the sum of lines a through j should equal the total amount of Title II, Part A funds allocated to your district in 2011-12, below) |
$_____________ |
||
|
Total Title II, Part A funds allocated to your district for 2011-12 |
|
If your district allocated 2011-12 funds for class size reduction (2c), then complete question 3. If your district allocated 2011-12 funds for professional development for teachers (2a), then complete question 4. If your district did not allocate funds for either class size reduction or professional development, skip to question 5. All districts should respond to questions 5 though 7.
3. How many classroom teachers were funded with 2011-12 Title II, Part A funds? Please report the information by type of teacher and by grade. Report total FTEs funded with Title II, Part A program funds. If a teacher is hired on a part-time basis or is partially funded with program funds, report the appropriate FTEs. Example 1: A district received $10,000 in 2011-12 Title II, Part A program funding. A full-time teacher was hired, funded partially with Title II, Part A program funds, with the remaining portion of the salary made up with local funds. Complete the form to reflect the FTE portion of the teacher’s salary that was funded with Title II, Part A program funds. Example 2: A district received $15,000 in 2011-12 Federal Title II, Part A program funds. The district uses these funds to hire a kindergarten teacher who works half time. This teacher would be reported as 0.5 FTE. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of Funded FTEs by Grade |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Teacher Type: |
K |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Un-graded |
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total Number of Funded FTEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Provide the dollar amount of 2011-12 Title II, Part A funds allocated for professional development for public school teachers and paraprofessionals in each of the following content areas (do not include carryover funds). You can estimate if you do not have exact figures.
|
Continue to question 5.
Please respond to questions 5 through 7 regarding all high quality professional development, as defined by Section 9101(34) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1 conducted last year, in 2010-11, not just high quality professional development funded by Title II, Part A.
5. Report the total number of teachers in your district in 2010-11 and, of those, the number of teachers who participated in high quality professional development, as defined by Section 9101(34) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, by highly qualified status of the teacher. Only include teachers in the core academic content areas2.
|
6. For each type of professional development activity listed below, please estimate the number of teachers who participated for the 2010-11 school year (including summer 2011). This can be a duplicated count, in that a teacher who participated in multiple professional development activities would be counted more than once.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. For each professional development topic listed below, report the number of sessions offered by your district that covered the topic in 2010-11. Then, report the total number of teachers in your district participating. These are potentially duplicated counts in that one high quality professional development session may cover more than one topic and teachers may participate in multiple professional development sessions.
|
1 Professional development that meets the statutory requirements, includes, but is not limited to, sustained, intensive, classroom-focused activities that give teachers the academic content knowledge and instructional strategies to help students meet state academic standards and are an integral part of broad schoolwide and districtwide educational improvement plans.
2 English, reading, language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, geography.
2008-09 Title II, Part A Grants OMB # 1810-0618
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | CLASS-SIZE REDUCTION PROGRAM: 2000-2001 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT |
Author | Beth Sinclair |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-02-01 |