Sixty-day Preclearance Federal Register Notice

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

48992

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 155 / Thursday, August 12, 2010 / Notices

Information Inc., Taipei, Taiwan;
Transcend Information Inc. (US),
Orange, CA; and Transcend Information
Inc., Shanghai, China.
The complainant, proposed
respondents, other interested parties,
and members of the public are invited
to file comments, not to exceed five
pages in length, on any public interest
issues raised by the complaint.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation would negatively affect the
public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production
of like or directly competitive articles in
the United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, five
business days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Submissions should
refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No.
2749’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. The
Commission’s rules authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means only to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the
rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
documents/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:22 Aug 11, 2010

Jkt 220001

electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10,
210.50(a)(4)).

Consent Decree. The settlement
requires, among other things, that the
Defendant pay $150,000, provide
$50,000 worth of construction materials
to EPA, and grant an easement to the
State of Idaho. The settlement also
requires the Defendant to assign its
interest in applicable insurance policies
to the Coeur d’Alene Basin Insurance
Recovery Trust, established for the
benefit of EPA and the natural resource
trustees.
For thirty (30) days after the date of
this publication, the Department of
Justice will receive comments relating to
the Consent Decree. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either e-mailed
to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611. In either case, the
comments should refer to U.S. v. Mascot
Mines, Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–
Issued: August 6, 2010.
3–128/7.
By order of the Commission.
During the comment period, the
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Consent Decree may be examined on the
Secretary to the Commission.
following Department of Justice Web
[FR Doc. 2010–19892 Filed 8–11–10; 8:45 am]
site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Under the Comprehensive
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
Environmental Response,
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
Compensation, and Liability Act
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
(CERCLA)
requesting a copy from the Consent
Notice is hereby given that on August Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $22.00 (25 cents per
6, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree in
page reproduction cost) payable to the
the case of U.S. v. Mascot Mines, Inc.,
et al., Civil Action No. 08–383–EJL, with United States Treasury or, if by e-mail
or fax, forward a check in that amount
Defendant Zanetti Brothers, Inc., was
to the Consent Decree Library at the
lodged with the United States District
stated address.
Court for the District of Idaho.
The United States filed a complaint in Maureen Katz,
September 2008, on behalf of the
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Environmental Protection Agency
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
(EPA), alleging that Defendant Zanetti
Division.
Brothers, Inc., is liable pursuant to
[FR Doc. 2010–19913 Filed 8–11–10; 8:45 am]
Section 107(a) of CERCLA for response
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
costs incurred and to be incurred by the
United States in connection with
Operable Unit Three of the Bunker Hill
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mining and Metallurgical Complex
Superfund Site in northern Idaho. The
Occupational Safety and Health
proposed Consent Decree grants the
Administration
Defendant a covenant not to sue for
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0033]
response costs, as well as natural
resource damages, in connection with
Baseline Safety and Health Practices;
the Site. The United States Department
Office of Management and Budget’s
of the Interior, the United States
(OMB) Approval of Information
Department of Agriculture, and the
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Coeur d’Alene Tribe are trustees of
injured natural resources at the Site, and AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
the Tribe is a party to the proposed
Administration (OSHA), Labor.

PO 00000

Frm 00072

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM

12AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 155 / Thursday, August 12, 2010 / Notices
ACTION:

Request for public comment.

The Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) is
soliciting public comments concerning
the collection of information about the
safety and health practices of private
sector establishments in agriculture
(with 10 or more workers) and nonagriculture industries, as well as public
sector establishments in those states
with OSHA-approved safety and health
programs (State Plan states).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
October 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may
submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2010–0033, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the Information
Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA–2010–
0033). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public Participation’’
heading in the section of this notice
titled ‘‘Supplementary Information.’’
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:22 Aug 11, 2010

Jkt 220001

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may contact Todd Owen or Theda
Kenney at the address below to obtain
a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Owen or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) is undertaking a
rulemaking effort directed toward
requiring employers to establish injury
and illness prevention programs to
monitor and more effectively implement
practices to mitigate workplace hazards,
thereby reducing the incidence of
employee injuries and illnesses. OSHA
believes that widespread
implementation of such programs will
substantially improve overall workplace
safety and health conditions.
To gain information needed to
support this rulemaking effort, OSHA is
proposing to conduct a statistical survey
of private sector establishments in nonagricultural industries. The goal of the
survey is to develop industry-specific,
statistically accurate estimates of the
current prevalence of a variety of
baseline safety and health practices that

PO 00000

Frm 00073

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

48993

may be elements of injury and illness
prevention programs among
establishments. OSHA also proposes to
conduct case study interviews in two
sectors: (1) establishments in the
agriculture sector to assess the
prevalence of safety and health practices
among farms with more than 10
workers; and (2) interviews with
government officials in State Plan states
to assess safety and heath practices
among agencies and departments
operated by state and local governments
in State Plan states.
In addition to the statistical survey
(Baseline Safety and Health Practices)
described above—which also includes
‘‘case studies’’ in two industry sectors
that could not be adequately sampled by
the survey methodology—the Agency is
proposing to conduct as many as 50 site
visits to employers. These employers
could potentially be affected by a new
standard that could require a
management program or system to
address workplace hazards. Site visits
would collect information on current
employer practices (much like the
information collected in the ‘‘case
studies’’ and the survey questionnaire
itself), but also solicit information from
employers on how they would comply
with such a regulation and what time or
costs would be required to do so. Site
visit reports capture much richer detail
about employer conditions than the
survey instrument, reflecting variations
of employer size and industry sector.
These site visits would be conducted
either by OSHA personnel or a
contractor under the agency’s direction.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting OMB approval of
the collection of information
(paperwork) requirements contained in
the Baseline Safety and Health Practices
Survey. The hour burden of the

E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM

12AUN1

48994

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 155 / Thursday, August 12, 2010 / Notices

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

information collection effort for the
study is 4,177 hours. The burden hour
estimates are based on tests of the length
of time each type of respondent is likely
to need to respond to the survey
questions. The total cost to respondents
is $213,153. This is a one-time data
collection effort.
OSHA will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice,
and will include this summary in its
request to OMB to approve the
information collection requirements in
the Baseline Safety and Health Practices
Survey.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Title: Baseline Safety and Health
Practices.
OMB Number: 1218–0NEW.
Affected Public: Private businesses;
state and local government entities in
State plan states.
Number of Respondents: Statistical
Survey—14,202; Case Studies—85
(agriculture and government sectors
combined); Site visits—50.
Frequency: Nonrecurring.
Estimated Time Per Response:
Statistical Survey—30 minutes (0.5
hour); Case Studies—30 minutes (0.5
hour) for agricultural establishments, 60
minutes (1 hour) for state and local
governments; Site visits—2 hours.
Total Burden Hours: Statistical
Survey—4,022; Case Studies—55; Site
Visits—100.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on this Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
materials must identify the Agency
name and the OSHA docket number for
the ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0033).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:22 Aug 11, 2010

Jkt 220001

security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g. copyrighted
material) is not publically available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available through the Web site’s ‘‘User
Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office for information about materials
not available through the Web site, and
for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31160).
Signed at Washington, DC, on this 6th day
of August 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–19869 Filed 8–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Records Schedules; Availability and
Request for Comments
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed records schedules; request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA)
publishes notice at least once monthly
of certain Federal agency requests for
records disposition authority (records
schedules). Once approved by NARA,
records schedules provide mandatory
instructions on what happens to records
when no longer needed for current

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00074

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Government business. They authorize
the preservation of records of
continuing value in the National
Archives of the United States and the
destruction, after a specified period, of
records lacking administrative, legal,
research, or other value. Notice is
published for records schedules in
which agencies propose to destroy
records not previously authorized for
disposal or reduce the retention period
of records already authorized for
disposal. NARA invites public
comments on such records schedules, as
required by 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a).
DATES: Requests for copies must be
received in writing on or before
September 13, 2010. Once the appraisal
of the records is completed, NARA will
send a copy of the schedule. NARA staff
usually prepare appraisal
memorandums that contain additional
information concerning the records
covered by a proposed schedule. These,
too, may be requested and will be
provided once the appraisal is
completed. Requesters will be given 30
days to submit comments.
ADDRESSES: You may request a copy of
any records schedule identified in this
notice by contacting the Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML) using
one of the following means:
Mail: NARA (NWML), 8601 Adelphi
Road, College Park, MD 20740–6001.
E-mail: request.schedule@nara.gov.
FAX: 301–837–3698.
Requesters must cite the control
number, which appears in parentheses
after the name of the agency which
submitted the schedule, and must
provide a mailing address. Those who
desire appraisal reports should so
indicate in their request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurence Brewer, Director, Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML),
National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road,
College Park, MD 20740–6001.
Telephone: 301–837–1539. E-mail:
records.mgt@nara.gov.
Each year
Federal agencies create billions of
records on paper, film, magnetic tape,
and other media. To control this
accumulation, agency records managers
prepare schedules proposing retention
periods for records and submit these
schedules for NARA’s approval, using
the Standard Form (SF) 115, Request for
Records Disposition Authority. These
schedules provide for the timely transfer
into the National Archives of
historically valuable records and
authorize the disposal of all other
records after the agency no longer needs

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM

12AUN1