Att B

29550

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices

balanced in terms of points of view
represented and the committee’s
function. Every effort is made to ensure
that individuals from a broad
representation of geographic areas,
females, ethnic and minority groups,
and the disabled are given consideration
for membership on HHS Federal
advisory committees. Appointment to
this Committee shall be made without
discrimination on the basis of age, race,
ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation,
disability, and cultural, religious, or
socioeconomic status.
Nominations must state that the
nominee is willing to serve as a member
of SACHRP and appears to have no
conflict of interest that would preclude
membership. Potential candidates are
required to provide detailed information
concerning such matters as financial
holdings, consultancies, and research
grants or contracts to permit evaluation
of possible sources of conflict of
interest.

proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 or send
comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar, CDC
Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton
Road, MS D–74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or
send an e-mail to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.

Dated: May 19, 2010.
Jerry Menikoff,
Director, Office for Human Research
Protections, Executive Secretary, Secretary’s
Advisory Committee on Human Research
Protections.

Proposed Project
Workload Management Study of
Central Cancer Registries—New—
Division of Cancer Prevention and
Control, National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

[FR Doc. 2010–12636 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–36–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–10–09BV]

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the

objectives, and their infrastructure and
operational attributes.
Central cancer registries report that
they are chronically understaffed, and
many registries are concerned about the
impact of staff shortages on data quality
standards. Staffing patterns are known
to vary widely from registry to registry,
and registries differ greatly in the
number of incidence cases that they
process as well as their use of
information technology. Cancer
registries have asked for clear staffing
guidelines based on registry
characteristics such as size (i.e., number
of new cases annually), degree of
automation, and registry-specific
reporting procedures.
CDC proposes to conduct a one-time
Workload Management Survey (WLM)
in 2010 to inform the development of
staffing guidelines for central cancer
registries. The WLM survey questions
do not duplicate the program and
performance indicator information
reported to CDC on a routine basis.
Respondents will be cancer registrars in
the NPCR-funded central cancer
registries in 45 States and the District of
Columbia. Cancer registrars at each
registry will maintain a paper-based
Work Activities Journal for a one-week
period. At the end of the week, the
registry manager will consolidate the
individual journal worksheets to
prepare an aggregate Workload
Management Survey for the registry,
which will be submitted to CDC
electronically.
Results of the WLM survey will
enable CDC to assess the workforce
necessary for meeting data reporting
requirements and to estimate the impact
of planned changes to surveillance data
reporting. Finally, CDC will develop
specific guidance so that cancer registry
managers can more effectively measure
workload, evaluate the need for staff
and staff credentials, and advocate for
adequate staffing.
Participation in the survey is
voluntary. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time.

Background and Brief Description
CDC currently supports the National
Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), a
group of central cancer registries in 45
States, the District of Columbia, and 2
territories. The central cancer registries
are data systems that collect, manage,
and analyze data about cancer cases and
cancer deaths. NPCR-funded central
cancer registries submit populationbased cancer incidence data to CDC on
an annual basis (OMB No. 0920–0469,
exp. 1/31/2010). In addition, NPCRfunded registries submit program and
performance indicator information to
CDC on a semi-annual schedule (OMB
No. 0920–0706, exp. 12/31/2011). CDC
uses the performance indicators to
evaluate the registries’ use of funds,
their progress toward meeting

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents

Average
burden per
response
(in hours)

Number of
responses per
respondent

Total burden
(in hours)

Type of respondents

Form name

NPCR Registries ...............................

Workload Management Survey ........
Work Activities Journal .....................

46
368

1
1

4
2

184
736

Total ...........................................

...........................................................

........................

........................

........................

920

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:16 May 25, 2010

Jkt 220001

PO 00000

Frm 00044

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–12665 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: FASD Diagnosis and
Intervention Programs in the Fetal
Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)
Center of Excellence—New

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration

Since 2001, SAMHSA’s Center for
Substance Abuse Prevention has been
operating a Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorder (FASD) Center of Excellence
which addresses FASD mainly by
providing trainings and technical
assistance and developing and

29551

supporting systems of care that respond
to FASD using effective evidence-based
practices and interventions.
Currently the integration of evidencebased practices into service delivery
organizations is being accomplished
through subcontracts. One such
intervention which integrates diagnosis
and intervention strategies into existing
service delivery organizations is the
FASD Diagnosis and Intervention
programs targeting children 0–18 years
of age. The Diagnosis and Intervention
programs use the following 11 data
collection tools.

DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS/ACTIVITY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS
Instrument/Activity

Description

Screening and Diagnosis Tool .....................................................

The purpose of the screening and diagnosis tool is to determine eligibility to
participate in the SAMHSA FASD Center Diagnosis and Treatment Intervention. The form includes demographic, screening, and diagnostic data.
The Positive Monitor Tracking form is to monitor the outcome of placing a child
(ages 0–3 years) on a positive monitor.
The Services Child is Receiving at the time of the FASD Diagnosis form is to
record services the child is receiving at the time of an FASD diagnosis.
The Services Planned and Provided based on Diagnostic Evaluation form is to
record services planned and received based on the diagnostic evaluation.
The Services Delivery Tracking form is for the services provided during every
visit.
The End of Intervention/Program Improvement Measure—Case Manager form
is for the case manager to report on the overall improvement in the child as
a result of receiving services.
The End of Intervention/Program Improvement Measure—Parent/Guardian
form is for the parent/guardian to report on the overall improvement in the
child as a result of receiving services.
The End of Intervention/Program Customer Satisfaction with Service form is to
determine customer satisfaction (parents) with the SAMHSA FASD Center
Diagnosis and Intervention project.
The Outcome Measures (Children 0–7 years) form is an outcomes measure
checklist used to record measures every six months from start of service to
end of service, at end of intervention, at 6 months follow-up, and 12 months
follow-up.
The Outcome Measures (Children 8–18 years) form is an outcomes measure
checklist used to record measures every six months from start of service to
end of service, at end of intervention, at 6 months follow-up, and 12 months
follow-up.
The Lost to follow-up form is used if the child is no longer accessible for follow-up.

Positive Monitor Tracking ............................................................
Services Child is Receiving at the time of the FASD Diagnosis
Services Planned and Provided based on Diagnostic Evaluation
Services Delivery Tracking Form .................................................
End of Intervention/Program Improvement Measure—Case
Manager.
End of Intervention/Program Improvement Measure—Parent/
Guardian.
End of Intervention/Program Customer Satisfaction with Service
Outcome Measures (Children 0–7 years) ...................................

Outcome Measures (Children 8–18 years) .................................

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

Lost to follow-up ...........................................................................

Eight subcontracts were awarded in
February 2008 to integrate the FASD
Diagnosis and Intervention program
within existing service delivery
organization sites. Using an integrated
service delivery model all sites are
screening children using an FASD
screening tool, obtaining a diagnostic
evaluation, and providing services/
interventions as indicated by the
diagnostic evaluation. Specific
interventions are based upon the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:16 May 25, 2010

Jkt 220001

individual child’s diagnosis. Six of the
sites are integrating the FASD Diagnosis
and Intervention projects either in a
child mental health provider setting or
in a dependency court setting and serve
children ages 0–7 years. Two of the sites
are delinquency courts and serve
children 10–18 years of age. Data
collection at all sites involves
administering the screening and
diagnosis tool, recording process level
indicators such as type and units of

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

service provided; improvement in
functionality and outcome measures
such as school performance, stability in
housing/placement, and adjudication
measures (10–18 yrs only). Data will be
collected at baseline, monthly, every six
months from start of service to end of
service, at end of intervention, at 6
months follow-up, and 12 months
follow-up.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1