Download:
pdf |
pdfNew York
EQUINE SURVEY
2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Equine Survey Highlights ............................................................................................................................
Table 1. Equine by Type ...............................................................................................................................
Table 2. Equine Survey Highlights .............................................................................................................
5
7
8
Equine by District
11
10
12
13
14
15
15
Equine by Primary Use ................................................................................................................................
17
18
19
Equine Operations ..........................................................................................................................................
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
Equine Related Expenditures and Revenues .....................................................................................
26
27
28
Equine Related Labor ...................................................................................................................................
29
30
Operator Information ..................................................................................................................................
31
31
32
33
The Equine Industry‛s Contribution to the New York State Economy ..............................
Table 23. Estimated Economic Impact of the New York State Equine Industry ..........................
35
37
Equine Survey Procedures ........................................................................................................................
39
Counties by District (map) ...........................................................................................................................
Table 3. Equine by Type and District......................................................................................................
Table 4. Equine Inventory and Value by Breed.....................................................................................
Table 5. Light Breeds by District ............................................................................................................
Table 6. Draft Horse Breeds by District ..............................................................................................
Table 7. Ponies, Miniature Horses and Donkeys by District .............................................................
Table 8.
Table 9.
Table 10.
Table 11.
Table 12.
Table 13.
Table 14.
Table 15.
Table 16.
Table 17.
Equine by Primary Use and District ........................................................................................
Equine by Primary Use and Breed ............................................................................................
Equine Operations by District ..................................................................................................
Equine Operations by Type and District ................................................................................
Equine Operations by Discipline ...............................................................................................
Equine Operations by Length of Time Equine-Related Usage ..........................................
Preceding Use by Property ........................................................................................................
Acreage in Equine Related Usage and Value by District....................................................
Value of Equine Related Assets by District – December 31, 2005 .................................
Equine Facilities by District .....................................................................................................
Table 18. Equine Related Expenditures ....................................................................................................
Table 19. Equine Related Revenues ...........................................................................................................
Table 20. Equine Related Labor ..................................................................................................................
Table 21 Operation Information ...............................................................................................................
Equine Inventory (map) .................................................................................................................................
Table 22. Equine Inventory and Value by County ...................................................................................
-4-
EQUINE SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS
EQUINE POPULATION
The 2005 Equine Survey indicated there
were an estimated 197,000 equine of all
types in New York on December 31, 2005,
up 17 percent from the 168,000 on hand
September 1, 2000. Race horse breeds
totaled 50,200 head, up 20 percent from
2000, while other light horses increased
to 113,400, a 13 percent increase. All
light horse breeds combined totaled
163,600, up 15 percent.
Draft horse breeds increased from
11,500 head in 2000 to 12,100 in 2005,
an increase of five percent, while
donkeys and mules rose 40 percent to
a total of 3,500 head. Ponies posted
a 3 percent decrease to 12,000 head,
continuing the trend begun in 1988. A
new category of Miniature Horses was
added to the 2005 Equine Survey for
the first time for a total of 6,600 head.
VALUE OF EQUINE
All equine as of December 31, 2005,
were valued at $1.83 billion, up eight
percent from 2000. Average value per
head was computed from the survey
data for each breed and aggregated to
the total for all equine. Average value
for race horse breeds decreased
17 percent to $22,710 per head. Other
categories of equine, except for donkeys,
-5-
donkeys, mules, all increased in average
value. Other light horses increased
6 percent to $5,270 per head. Draft
horse breed average value increased
24 percent, from $2,500 to $3,100.
Value of ponies increased 62 percent
to $3,890 per head, while donkeys and
mules decreased 9 percent to $800
per head. Miniature horse value was
$1,400 per head.
EQUINE LABOR
The survey indicated a total of 12,500
hired workers were employed by New
York equine operations during 2005.
Of these, 5,700 were full-time workers
and 6,800 were part-time workers. In
addition, 3,700 private contractors
were employed by equine operations,
and 11,100 volunteers contributed 1.83
million hours. Operators and unpaid
family members worked an additional
43.2 million hours throughout 2005.
Additional labor categories are shown
in Table 20.
EQUINE REVENUES
EQUINE RELATED ASSETS
Survey tabulations indicated total
equine-related assets of $10.4 billion
on December 31, 2005, an increase of
69 percent since the 2000 survey. The
value of land, fences, and buildings
accounted for $7.08 billion, or 68 percent
of the total assets. This value included
$296 million for the 2,900 indoor arenas
in New York. Equine on hand, at
$1.83 billion, accounted for 18 percent
of the assets. Vehicles, equipment,
tack, and equine feed and supplies on
hand, at $1.45 billion, accounted for the
remaining 14 percent.
EQUINE EXPENDITURES
New York equine owners and operators
spent a total of $2.06 billion during 2005
for operating and capital expenses, an
increase of nearly three times above
the 2000 total of $704 million. About
$1.10 billion, or 53 percent, of the
total was for operating expenses.
The leading operating expenses and
amounts spent were: feed, $119
million; hired labor, $169 million; and
boarding $156 million. Operating
expenses averaged $5,594 per equine.
Additional expense categories are
shown in Table 18.
Expenditures for capital items
increased greatly from the 2000
survey. Capital expenditures totaled
$958 million, up from $181 million
in 2000. Purchases of equipment
totaled $214 million. Purchases of
equine amounted to $254 million,
and the purchase or improvement
of equine-related real estate totaled
$490 million.
-6-
This new category was added for the
2005 Equine Survey. Respondents
were surveyed for the revenues
generated by their equine operation.
Revenues totaled $445 million, with
equine services revenue totaling $158
million, or 36 percent of the total. The
next highest category of revenues
was for equine sales, at $118 million,
or 27 percent of the total. Training
revenues, breeding services and fees,
and revenue from winnings made up
the rest of the revenue.
Table 1. EQUINE BY TYPE, NEW YORK, 1978, 1988, 2000, and 2005
Type
1978
1988
2000
2005
Race Horse Breeds ..........................................................
46,050
50,000
42,000
50,200
Other Light Breeds ...........................................................
93,350
105,800
100,500
113,400
Total Light Horse Breeds ...............................................
139,400
155,800
142,500
163,600
Draft Horse Breeds ...........................................................
5,400
7,200
11,500
12,100
Ponies...............................................................................
33,000
17,000
11,500
11,200
Miniature Horses ..............................................................
NA
NA
NA
6,600
Donkeys/Mules .................................................................
2,200
2,000
2,500
3,500
TOTAL EQUINE ...............................................................
180,000
182,000
168,000
197,000
Race Horse 50,200
Other Light 113,400
Draft Horse
12,100
Ponies
11,200
Minature H
6,600
3,500
Donkeys/M
TOTAL EQUINE BY TYPE, 2005
Other Light Breeds
113,400
Race Horse Breeds
50,200
Donkeys/Mules,
3,500
Minature Horses
6,600
Ponies
11,200
Draft Horse
Breeds
12,100
-7-
Table 2. EQUINE SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS, NEW YORK, 2005
Categories
Number
Average
per equine 1/
Total
Value
Dollars
Thousand Dollars
EQUINE BY TYPE
Racing Breed Horses
Other Light Horses
Draft Horses
Ponies
Miniature Horses
Donkeys and Mules
Total All Equine
50,200
113,400
12,100
11,200
6,600
3,500
197,000
22,710
5,270
3,100
3,890
1,400
800
9,300
1,139,880
598,030
37,480
43,610
9,240
2,800
1,831,040
EQUINE OPERATIONS BY TYPE
Commercial Boarding/Training
Commercial Breeding
Crop/Livestock Farms
Non-Commercial/Non-Farm
Other
Total Equine Operations
Acres Used for Equine
Fenced Pasture
Number of Stalls
Indoor Arenas
Outdoor Arenas
4,700
2,300
6,000
19,100
900
33,000
987,000
390,000
209,900
2,900
16,000
ASSET VALUES, DECEMBER 31, 2005
Equine on Hand
Land, Fences and Buildings
Vehicles, Equipment
Tack Equipment and Clothing
Equine Feed Supplies
Total Equine Related Assets
Indoor Arenas 2/
Horse Trailers and Vans 3/
1,831,040
7,084,830
1,105,290
268,180
72,220
10,361,560
295,760
272,550
EXPENDITURES DURING 2005
Equine Purchased
Real Estate and Improvements
Equipment Purchased
Total Capital Expenditures
Feed
Labor Expenditures
Boarding
Training
Other
Total Operating Expenditures
Total Expenditures
602
857
791
291
3,052
5,594
-8-
254,000
490,440
213,690
958,130
118,650
168,810
155,920
57,330
601,230
1,101,940
2,060,070
Table 2. EQUINE SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS, NEW YORK, 2005 (Continued)
Categories
Number
Average
per equine 1/
Total
Value
Dollars
Thousand Dollars
TOTAL WORKERS
Full-Time Workers
Part-Time Workers
Total Hired Workers
Cash Labor Expenditures
Value of Non-cash Items Provided to Workers
Total Hired Labor Expenditures
Private Contractors
Volunteer Workers
Workers for Whom Housing was Provided
Volunteer Hours Worked
Operator and unpaid family member hours
5,700
6,800
12,500
156,600
12,210
168,810
3,700
11,100
2,500
1,830,500
43,200,000
REVENUES
445,130
117,830
75,310
32,810
158,390
60,790
Total Sales
Total Training
Total Breeding
Total Services
Total Winnings
1/ Based on total equine on hand December 31, 2005.
2/ Value of indoor arenas included in total value of land, fences and buildings.
3/ Value of horse trailers and vans included in total value of vehicles and equipment.
-9-
CLINTON
FRANKLIN
ST. LAWRENCE
NORTHERN
ESSEX
JEFFERSON
NORTHEAST
LEWIS
ONEIDA
ORLEANS
MONROE
CHEMUNG
BROOME
TIOGA
GREENE
DELAWARE
SOUTHEAST
SULLIVAN
SS
CHE
ULSTER
New York State
RENSSELAER
SOUTHERN
RIE ALBANY
HA
HO
C
S
OTSEGO
DUT
SOUTHWEST
MONTGOMERY TADY
EC
SCHEN
MADISON
SCH
UYL TOMPKIN
S
ER
STEUBEN
EASTERN
CENTRAL
CO
RT
LA
ND
SARAT
OGA
COLUMBIA
ALLEGANY
YATES
FULTON
AG
A
GO
AN
EN
CH
CATTARAUGUS
LIVINGSTON
ON
ON
D
A
UG
C
A
QU
AU
UT
A
H
ONTARIO
WYOMING
SENECA
WESTERN
ERIE
CAY
GENESEE
WAYNE
WARREN
TON
WASHING
HERKIMER
OSWEGO
NIAGARA
HAMILTON
PUTNAM
COUNTIES BY DISTRICT
ORANGE
WESTCHESTER
BRONX
ROCKLAND
NEWYORK
SUFFOLK
NASSAU
LONG ISLAND
KINGS
RICHMOND
- 10 -
QUEENS
EQUINE BY DISTRICT
or 21 percent, were in the Western
District. The Central District was
second with 2,500 head, followed by
the Southwest District with 1,700 head.
Miniature horses were surveyed
for the first time in 2005 with
a result of 6,600 head. The
largest
inventory was in the
Western District with 1,500 head
(23 percent), with the Central and
Southeast Districts both coming in
with 1,200 head, or 18 percent, each.
EQUINE BY BREED
The concentration of New York State
equine made some changes since
the 2000 survey. Of the 197,000 total
equine in New York on December 31,
2005, 22 percent, or 42,500 head,
were in the Southeast District (2nd place
in 2000). The Western District had 19
percent of total equine with 37,900
head (1st place in 2000). The Central
District came in third with 32,300
head (4th in 2000), or 16 percent, and
the Eastern District fell to fourth with
29,100 head (3rd in 2000) or 15 percent.
For all light horses combined
(race horse breeds plus all other
light horse breeds), the Southeast
District was first with 36,600 head,
or 22 percent of the 163,600 head.
Next was the Western District with
31,100 head (19 percent), then the
Central District with 26,100 head (16
percent). The Eastern District ranked
fourth with 24,600 head (15 percent).
Ponies totaled 11,200 head, with 2,700
(24 percent) in the Southeast District.
The Western District accounted for
2,300 head (21 percent), just ahead of
the Central District with 1,900 head (17
percent). Of the 12,100 draft horses
indicated by the survey, 2,600 head,
- 11 -
Quarter Horses jumped in inventory
from 29,600 head in 2000 to 38,100
head in 2005, a 29 percent increase,
continuing the trend since 1988.
Second was Thoroughbreds with
33,300 head, 9 percent over 2000.
Standardbred inventory gained 47
percent to 16,900 head, reversIng
the decline in numbers since 1978.
Other major breeds of light horses were
Warmbloods (25 percent increase),
Pinto/Paints (up 21 percent),Appaloosas
(5 percent down), and Morgans (9
percent decrease). Belgians, despite
a 2 percent decrease in inventory,
still comprised 50 percent of draft
horse inventory. Percheron numbers
increased six percent to 3,400,
and Clydesdale numbers climbed 29
percent to 900. Welsh and Shetland
ponies were the most common pony
breeds, accounting for 29 percent and
21 percent, respectively, of all ponies.
AVERAGE VALUES BY BREED
Thoroughbreds continued to have the
highest average value, at $27,600 per
head, even though they registered
an 18 percent decrease since 2000.
Average value of Standardbreds
increased 25 percent to $13,100
per head. With the increase in
average value and larger inventory,
Standardbred total value gained 84
percent to $222 million. Race horse
breeds accounted for 62 percent of the
total value of equine in New York State.
The average value of Warmbloods
increased 10 percent to $22,000
per head. With increased average
value and inventory, total value
jumped 38 percent to $185 million.
Welsh ponies also increased in
average value, from $3,500 per
head in 2000 to $6,800 per head
in 2005, a jump of 94 percent.
Welsh ponies accounted for 50
percent of the total pony value.
The average values of individual breeds
and miscellaneous breed categories
reflect the average prices one would
have had to pay to purchase the
same type of animals on December
31, 2005. Reported values ranged
from high-priced breeding, racing,
and show stock to low-valued grade
animals and older equine. High
sentimental values placed on “family
member” equine were excluded from
average value calculations. Values
by breed are shown in Table 4.
Table 3. EQUINE BY TYPE AND DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
District
Total Equine
Light
Horses 1/
Draft Horses
Ponies
Miniature
Horses
Donkeys and
Mules
Northern
7,400
5,700
800
400
300
200
Northeast
6,400
5,000
600
400
300
100
Western
37,900
31,100
2,600
2,300
1,500
400
Central
32,300
26,100
2,500
1,900
1,200
600
Eastern
29,100
24,600
1,300
1,800
700
700
Southwest
14,700
11,200
1,700
600
800
400
Southern
11,400
9,200
1,000
500
400
300
Southeast
42,500
36,600
1,300
2,700
1,200
700
Long Island and NYC
15,300
14,100
300
600
200
100
197,000
163,600
12,100
11,200
6,600
3,500
STATE
1/ Includes racing breeds.
- 12 -
Table 4. EQUINE INVENTORY AND VALUE BY BREED,
NEW YORK, 2000 and 2005
Breeds
Number
2000
Value
2005
2000
Head
LIGHT BREEDS
Quarter Horse
Saddlebred
Appaloosa
Arabian
Half Arabian
Morgan
Palomino
Pinto/Paint
Warmbloods
Haflinger
Crossbred/Unknown
Other Light
RACE HORSE BREEDS
Standardbred
Thoroughbred
DRAFT HORSE BREEDS
Belgian
Percheron
Clydesdale
Other
PONIES
Welsh
Shetland
Connemara
Other
MINIATURE HORSES
DONKEYS AND MULES
TOTAL EQUINE
Average Value
2005
2000
Thousand Dollars
2005
Dollars
100,500
29,600
2,500
8,500
9,200
3,600
9,000
1,600
6,800
6,700
NA
11,000
12,000
113,400
38,100
2,600
8,100
7,900
3,100
8,200
NA
8,200
8,400
3,000
14,200
11,600
497,520
115,440
15,750
19,550
44,160
10,800
38,700
4,960
21,760
134,000
NA
26,400
66,000
598,030
156,210
22,100
20,250
35,550
10,540
33,620
NA
28,700
184,800
7,200
52,200
46,860
4,950
3,900
6,300
2,300
4,800
3,000
4,300
3,100
3,200
20,000
NA
2,400
5,500
5,270
4,100
8,500
2,500
4,500
3,400
4,100
NA
3,500
22,000
3,300
4,500
2,400
42,000
11,500
30,500
50,200
16,900
33,300
1,142,500
120,750
1,021,750
1,139,880
221,880
918,000
27,200
10,500
33,500
22,710
13,100
27,600
11,500
6,100
3,200
700
1,500
12,100
6,000
3,400
900
1,800
29,380
13,420
8,320
2,240
5,400
37,480
13,200
9,520
4,860
9,900
2,550
2,200
2,600
3,200
3,600
3,100
2,200
2,800
5,400
5,500
11,500
2,700
2,100
500
6,200
11,200
3,200
2,300
800
4,900
29,900
9,450
2,520
3,050
14,880
43,610
21,760
2,300
6,320
13,230
2,600
3,500
1,200
6,100
2,400
3,890
6,800
1,000
7,900
2,700
NA
6,600
NA
9,240
NA
1,400
2,500
3,500
2,500
2,800
1,000
800
168,000
197,000
1,701,800
1,831,040
10,130
9,300
- 13 -
Table 5. LIGHT BREEDS BY DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
District
All
Light 1/
Racing Breeds
Standardbred
Thoroughbred
Quarter
Horses
Appaloosa
Number
Northern
Northeast
Western
Central
Eastern
Southwest
Southern
Southeast
Long Island and NYC
STATE
District
5,700
5,000
31,100
26,100
24,600
11,200
9,200
36,600
14,100
500
400
3,500
3,150
3,200
900
500
3,950
800
200
400
4,500
2,450
8,400
500
1,300
9,150
6,400
2,100
1,600
7,300
6,800
5,400
3,600
2,400
6,200
2,700
400
500
1,900
1,600
900
1,000
600
1,100
100
163,600
16,900
33,300
38,100
8,100
Arabian
Morgan
Pinto/Paint
Northern
Northeast
Western
Central
Eastern
Southwest
Southern
Southeast
Long Island and NYC
2/
2/
2,500
1,500
500
800
600
1,600
100
400
500
1,500
1,800
1,000
700
500
1,700
100
600
400
1,900
1,500
1,000
900
500
1,100
300
STATE
7,900
8,200
8,200
Crossbred
Other
Light
2/
2/
1,200
900
700
200
500
3,700
1,000
600
400
2,200
2,100
1,300
700
1,000
4,600
1,300
600
600
4,600
4,300
2,200
1,900
1,300
3,500
1,300
8,400
14,200
20,300
Warmbloods
Number
1/ Includes racing breeds.
2/ Less than 100 equine.
- 14 -
Table 6. DRAFT HORSE BREEDS BY DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
Total Draft
Breeds
District
Belgian
Percheron
Other Draft 1/
Northern
800
500
200
100
Northeast
600
2/
2/
2/
Western
2,600
1,500
700
400
Central
2,500
1,100
900
500
Eastern
1,300
500
400
400
Southwest
1,700
1,000
400
300
Southern
1,000
400
200
400
Southeast
1,300
400
400
500
300
2/
2/
2/
12,100
6,000
3,400
2,700
Long Island and NYC
STATE
1/ Other Draft includes Clydesdales and other draft breeds.
2/ Less than 100 equine or hidden for disclosure reasons.
Table 7. PONIES, MINIATURE HORSES AND DONKEYS,
BY DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
Total
Ponies
Welsh
Northern
400
100
200
100
300
200
Northeast
400
2/
2/
200
300
100
Western
2,300
700
550
1,000
1,500
400
Central
1,900
500
400
1,000
1,200
800
Eastern
1,800
600
300
900
700
500
Southwest
600
100
150
300
800
400
Southern
500
100
150
250
400
300
2,700
800
400
1,500
1,200
600
600
2/
2/
450
200
200
11,200
3,200
2,300
5,700
6,600
3,500
District
Southeast
Long Island and NYC
STATE
1/ Other ponies includes Connemara and other pony breeds.
2/ Less than 100 equine or hidden for disclosure reasons.
- 15 -
Shetland
Other
Ponies 1/
Miniature
Horses
Donkeys/
Mules
- 16 -
EQUINE BY PRIMARY USE
The 2005 Equine Survey added two
primary use categories per requests
from the equine industry, as shown in
Table 8. The added categories were
for Lesson horses and those horses
used in Specialty uses (equine used
primarily for commercial uses, such
as therapeutic riding, day camps,
riding stables, carriage rides, etc.).
Respondents were requested to
record each equine in only one
primary use category – the category
for which the animal provided the use
most important to the respondent.
PLEASURE USE
Forty-four percent of the equine
in New York in 2005 were kept
primarily for pleasure use, up from
39 percent in 2000. The greatest
number of equine for pleasure use
was in the Southeast District (16,000
head), while the highest percentage
of equine for pleasure use was
in Northern District (61 percent).
BREEDING USE
A total of 26,900 equine were used
primarily for breeding in 2005, 14
percent of all equine. This compares
to 30,100 head and 18 percent in 2000.
In 2005, brood mares totaled 22,400,
and stallions for breeding 4,500. Forty
one percent of the equine breeding
stock consisted of race horse breeds,
up from 31 percent in 2000. Included
in the breeding stock total were 29
percent of the miniature horses, 22
percent of the race horse breeds, 14
percent of the state’s draft horses, 10
percent of other light horse breeds,
and seven percent of the ponies.
The greatest number of equine for
breeding was in the Southeast District
(6,000 head), while the highest
percentage of equine for breeding was
in the Southern District (17 percent).
RACING USE
A total of 14,500 equine in New York
on December 31, 2005, were used
primarily for racing. Thoroughbreds
accounted for 63 percent and
Standardbreds 37 percent. (Only
Standardbreds and Thoroughbreds
were included in the “Racing” category.
All other breeds used for racing
were included in the “Competition or
Sport” category for this survey). The
largest number of equine for racing
(3,800 head) was in the Western
District, while the highest percentage
of equine for racing (18 percent)
was in the Long Island/NYC District.
COMPETITION OR SPORT USE
Nearly 14 percent of equine in 2005
were used for showing, polo, eventing,
etc., down from 17 percent in 2000.
The total of 27,000 head included 18
percent of the non-racing light horse
breeds, 16 percent of the ponies,
seven percent of the race and draft
horse breeds, and nine percent of
the miniature horses. The Western
District had the greatest number of
equine for competition use at 7,100
and also the highest percentage of
equine for competition at 19 percent.
LESSON USE
The 2005 Equine Survey included a
new category of Lesson Horses. Six
percent of horses in New York State
were primarily used for lessons. The
greatest number of lesson horses
was 3,000 in the Southeast District.
The highest concentration of lesson
horses was in the Southeast and
Long Island/NYC Districts, with
seven percent and 11 percent of
total horse population, respectively.
SPECIALTY & OTHER USE
Fifteen percent of New York’s equine
population in 2005 were kept for
specialty and other uses, such as
police work, carriage rides, day
camps, or work, or were retired, as
shown in Table 8. In Table 8, foals
are included under “All Other” uses.
- 17 -
Table 8. EQUINE BY PRIMARY USE AND DISTRICT,
NEW YORK, 2005
District
Total
Equine
Breeding
Lessons
Racing
Northern
7,400
900
400
100
Northeast
6,400
900
200
400
Western
37,900
4,300
1,900
3,800
Central
32,300
4,800
1,600
1,600
Eastern
29,100
4,100
1,000
2,000
Southwest
14,700
2,500
600
300
Southern
11,400
1,900
700
200
Southeast
42,500
6,000
3,000
3,400
Long Island and NYC
15,300
1,500
1,700
2,700
197,000
26,900
11,100
14,500
Competition
Pleasure
Specialty
All
Other
STATE
District
Northern
600
4,500
-
900
Northeast
1,000
3,300
-
600
Western
7,100
15,000
800
5,000
Central
4,700
13,600
700
5,300
Eastern
3,400
15,400
-
3,200
Southwest
1,000
7,900
300
2,100
Southern
1,100
5,700
400
1,400
Southeast
5,900
16,000
2,000
6,200
Long Island and NYC
2,200
5,600
500
1,100
27,000
87,000
4,700
25,800
STATE
- 18 -
Table 9. EQUINE BY PRIMARY USE AND BREED, NEW YORK, 2005
Breed
LIGHT BREEDS
Total
Breeding
Broodmares
Stallions
2005 Foals
113,400
8,400
2,400
2,900
38,100
2,800
700
800
Saddlebred
2,600
300
1/
1/
Appaloosa
8,100
700
200
200
Arabian
7,900
700
200
100
Half Arabian
3,100
200
1/
100
Morgan
8,200
700
1/
200
Pinto/Paint
8,200
900
300
500
Warmbloods
8,400
500
1/
100
Haflinger
3,000
300
1/
300
Crossbred
14,200
200
1/
1/
Other
11,600
1,100
400
300
50,200
10,100
900
3,700
Standardbred
16,900
3,700
300
1,700
Thoroughbred
33,300
6,400
600
2,000
12,100
1,600
100
400
Belgian
6,000
1,200
100
200
Percheron
3,400
300
1/
1/
Other Drafts
2,700
100
1/
1/
PONIES
11,200
600
200
200
Welsh
3,200
100
1/
100
Other Ponies
8,000
500
1/
100
MINIATURE HORSES
6,600
1,300
600
500
DONKEYS AND MULES
3,500
400
300
100
197,000
22,400
4,500
7,800
Quarter Horse
RACE HORSE BREEDS
DRAFT HORSE BREEDS
TOTAL EQUINE
- 19 -
Table 9. EQUINE BY PRIMARY USE AND BREED, NEW YORK, 2005 (Continued)
Breed
Activity
Competition
Pleasure
Specialty
8,100
20,000
60,600
3,200
7,800
-
3,200
6,900
21,000
700
2,000
-
Saddlebred
100
600
900
1/
500
-
Appaloosa
200
400
5,600
300
500
-
Arabian
300
700
5,000
100
800
-
Half Arabian
100
300
2,000
1/
300
-
Morgan
200
1,500
4,800
1/
600
-
Pinto/Paint
300
800
4,700
300
400
-
Warmbloods
500
5,000
1,800
1/
400
-
Haflinger
100
300
1,200
1/
700
-
2,900
2,200
6,100
1,500
1,000
-
200
1,300
7,500
200
600
-
1,900
3,700
11,000
200
4,200
14,500
Standardbred
200
600
3,500
100
1,500
5,300
Thoroughbred
1,700
3,100
7,500
100
2,700
9,200
1/
900
5,100
200
3,800
-
Belgian
1/
300
1,500
1/
2,600
-
Percheron
1/
200
1,700
100
900
-
Other Drafts
1/
400
1,900
1/
300
-
PONIES
900
1,800
5,600
800
1,100
-
Welsh
300
800
1,600
1/
200
-
Other Ponies
600
1,000
4,000
1/
900
-
100
600
2,800
300
400
-
1/
1/
1,900
1/
700
-
11,100
27,000
87,000
4,700
18,000
14,500
LIGHT BREEDS
Quarter Horse
Crossbred
Other
RACE HORSE BREEDS
DRAFT HORSE BREEDS
MINIATURE HORSES
DONKEYS AND MULES
TOTAL EQUINE
Lessons
1/ Included in totals only.
- 20 -
Other
Racing
EQUINE OPERATIONS
New York had 33,000 places with
equine in 2005, compared with
30,000 places in 2000. A place is
defined as anyone operating land on
which equine are kept. Owners of
equine boarding their animals on land
they did not operate were excluded.
Operators of places with equine were
asked which type of activity best
described their operation. Almost
60 percent (19,100 places) of the
operators described their equine
operation as non-commercial/nonfarm. Second most common (6,000
places) were farms on which the major
activity was deriving income from crops
and/or livestock. Commercial boarding
and training operations were third, with
4,700 places. Commercial breeding
operations were next, with 2,300 places.
New York registered a large increase
in the number of non-commercial/nonfarm places between 2000 and 2005,
while the number of crop/livestock
farms decreased. The number of
crop/livestock farms decreased 25
percent from 2000, while the number
of non-commercial/non-farm places
increased 31 percent from 2000.
Most of the operations (80 percent) in
the state consider themselves involved
with recreational or pleasure riding or
driving. (Operators were permitted
to list more than one discipline that
they were involved with). The second
largest group was involved with shows
or competitive events, even though
this group showed a decrease from
2000. Most of the operations that were
involved with shows or competitive
events listed more than one discipline.
Many were also involved with recreation and pleasure riding or driving.
More than half (57 percent, or 18,900)
of the equine operations have been
in operation 11 or more years. This
number compares to 19,700, or 66
- 21 -
percent, of operations in 2000. The
number of newer operations, those
with equine five years or less, totaled
7,500 in 2005, compared with 4,900
in 2000. In most of the regions of the
state, the number of operations of five
years or less ranges from 19 to 26
percent of the total, with the exception
of the Northern District and Long Island/
New York City District, which have 29
percent and 31 percent, respectively.
Property use prior to involvement with
equine, for properties having equine
less than 10 years, was more or less
evenly divided among the four use
categories. Former non-agricultural
operations accounted for 25 percent.
Twenty-four percent of operations had
been livestock farms, excluding equine,
while former horse farms and former
crops farms accounted for 14 percent
and 20 percent respectively. Previous
property use for the remaining 17
percent was unknown or unreported.
Table 10. EQUINE OPERATIONS BY DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 1978-2005
District
1978
1988
2000
2005
Northern
3,600
2,650
1,700
1,700
Northeast
1,900
1,100
800
1,300
Western
8,800
8,000
7,100
8,000
Central
9,600
8,200
5,100
6,000
Eastern
3,500
4,500
4,500
3,400
Southwest
4,800
5,000
3,000
3,400
Southern
4,900
3,350
2,100
1,800
Southeast
9,300
5,550
4,700
5,600
Long Island and NYC
2,200
650
1,000
1,800
48,600
39,000
30,000
33,000
STATE
Table 11. EQUINE OPERATIONS BY TYPE AND DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
Primary Type
Discipline
Total
Operations
Commercial
Boarding &
Training
Commercial
Breeding
Crop/
Livestock
Farm
Noncommercial/
Non-farm
Other 1/
Northern
1,700
100
2/
650
800
2/
Northeast
1,300
150
2/
250
800
2/
Western
8,000
1,200
450
1,400
4,750
200
Central
6,000
700
400
1,200
3,500
200
Eastern
3,400
500
300
500
2,000
100
Southwest
3,400
400
200
900
1,800
100
Southern
1,800
300
200
2/
900
2/
Southeast
5,600
1,050
500
650
3,200
200
Long Island and NYC
1,800
300
2/
2/
1,350
2/
33,000
4,700
2,300
6,000
19,100
900
STATE
1/ Includes race tracks, fairgrounds, and other public facilities or institutions
2/ Less than 100 operations or hidden for disclosure reasons
- 22 -
Table 12. EQUINE OPERATIONS BY DISCIPLINE,
NEW YORK, 2005
Discipline
Exclusive Use
Number
Multilple Use
Percent 1/
Number
Total
Percent 1/ 2/
Number
Percent 1/ 2/
Thoroughbred Racing
750
2
500
2
1,250
4
Standardbred Racing
850
3
350
1
1,200
4
2,100
6
6,000
18
8,100
25
19,500
59
7,000
21
26,500
80
600
2
1,100
3
1,700
5
2,000
6
1,500
5
3,500
11
25,800
78
7,200
22
33,000
100
Shows or Competitive Events
Recreation or Pleasure
Therapeutic Riding, Riding Camps,
Rescue, etc.
Other
TOTAL
1/ Percent of all equine operations in the state.
2/ Does not round to total because of multiples uses per operation.
Table 13. EQUINE OPERATIONS BY LENGTH OF TIME
EQUINE-RELATED USAGE, NEW YORK, 2005
District
Total
Operations
Less than
3 years
3 to 5
years
6 to 10
years
11 to 20
years
21 years
or more
Northern
1,700
200
300
400
400
400
Northeast
1,300
50
200
250
200
600
Western
8,000
100
1,600
1,000
3,500
1,800
Central
6,000
550
650
1,200
2,200
1,400
Eastern
3,400
300
600
750
750
1,000
Southwest
3,400
250
600
550
1,000
1,000
Southern
1,800
50
300
400
450
600
Southeast
5,600
500
700
1,750
1,250
1,400
Long Island and NYC
1,800
100
450
300
450
500
33,000
2,100
5,400
6,600
10,200
8,700
STATE
- 23 -
Table 14. PRECEDING USE OF PROPERTY, NEW YORK, 2005 1/
District
Total
Operations
Horse
Farm
Crop
Farm
Livestock
Farm
NonAgricultural
Unknown
Type
Northern
900
50
50
200
200
400
Northeast
500
50
50
100
300
-
Western
2,700
500
700
800
400
300
Central
2,400
300
600
600
400
500
Eastern
1,650
200
400
400
400
250
Southwest
1,400
100
200
800
100
200
750
200
100
200
200
50
2,950
500
150
300
1,400
600
850
100
550
-
100
100
14,100
2,000
2,800
3,400
3,500
2,400
Southern
Southeast
Long Island and NYC
STATE
1/ Property use prior to involvement with equine for properties with equine less than 10 years.
Table 15. ACREAGE IN EQUINE RELATED USAGE AND VALUE
BY DISTRICT, NEW YORK, 2005
Equine Acres
Total Value of
Equine Related
Land, Fencing
and Buildings
Average
Value per
Equine Acre
Thousand Dollars
Dollars
Total
Acres
Total
Fenced
Pasture
Acres
Acres
Acres
Northern
176,000
39,000
21,000
57,880
1,480
Northeast
140,000
55,000
35,000
172,940
3,140
Western
886,000
263,000
55,000
940,450
3,580
Central
589,000
190,000
70,000
478,560
2,520
Eastern
313,000
104,000
52,000
630,770
6,070
Southwest
367,000
111,000
46,000
174,530
1,570
Southern
195,000
62,000
27,000
136,210
2,200
Southeast
354,000
135,000
72,000
2,605,060
19,300
50,000
28,000
12,000
1,888,430
67,440
3,070,000
987,000
390,000
7,084,830
7,180
District
Long Island and NYC
STATE
- 24 -
Table 16. VALUE OF EQUINE RELATED ASSETS BY DISTRICT,
NEW YORK, DECEMBER 31, 2005
District
Total
Equine
Related
Assets
Value of
Equine
on
Hand
Total Value
of Equine
Related Land,
Fencing and
Buildings
Vehicles and
Equipment
Horse
Trailers
and Vans
Total
Tack,
Equipment
and
Clothing
Equine
Feed and
Supplies
on Hand
Thousand Dollars
Northern
121,280
20,290
57,880
35,450
8,230
5,330
2,330
Northeast
259,020
30,540
172,940
45,170
10,870
8,810
1,560
1,437,520
162,620
940,450
256,620
60,780
59,810
18,020
Central
857,780
163,690
478,560
169,730
39,410
34,500
11,300
Eastern
1,173,850
416,340
630,770
99,640
26,340
18,990
8,110
Southwest
318,940
37,780
174,530
85,230
20,650
13,470
7,930
Southern
243,970
52,970
136,210
44,400
6,810
6,990
3,400
Southeast
3,439,020
500,120
2,605,060
243,390
51,320
75,260
15,190
Long Island and NYC
2,510,180
446,690
1,888,430
125,660
48,140
45,020
4,380
10,361,560
1,831,040
7,084,830
1,105,290
272,550
268,180
72,220
Western
STATE
Table 17. EQUINE FACILITIES BY DISTRICT,
NEW YORK, 2005
District
Indoor Arenas
Value of Indoor
Arenas
Outdoor Arenas
Number of Stalls
Number
Thousand Dollars
Number
Number
Northern
140
5,780
800
7,600
Northeast
80
3,490
700
7,600
Western
890
52,470
3,300
39,000
Central
540
54,030
2,400
33,000
Eastern
450
31,520
2,000
32,500
Southwest
100
5,060
1,400
18,200
Southern
140
9,720
800
9,100
Southeast
450
105,380
3,000
38,700
Long Island and NYC
110
28,310
1,600
24,200
2,900
295,760
16,000
209,900
STATE
- 25 -
EQUINE RELATED EXPENDITURES
AND REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Equine related expenditures totaled
$2.06 billion in 2005, almost tripling
from the $704 million spent in 2000.
Total equine related expenses
were broken down into two main
categories: operating expenses
and capital expenses. The major
increase in the expenditures came
from the capital expenses. Capital
expenses comprised 47 percent
of the total expenditures, and
increased from $181 million in 2000
to $958 million in 2005. Operating
expenses accounted for the other
43 percent of expenditures, and
increased from $523 million in
2000 to $1.10 billion in 2005.
Unlike 2000, labor expenses were
the largest category in expenditures,
with $168 million spent on cash and
non-cash labor expenditures, an
average of $857 per equine. Labor
expense almost doubled from 2000’s
expenditure of $88.3 million. Cash
labor expenditures included cash
wages as well as the employer’s cost
of Social Security tax, workmen’s
compensation, insurance, pension
and unemployment compensation.
Non-cash items included such things
as housing, meals, clothing, horse
board, lessons and other benefits.
Second was boarding fees with
expenditures of $156 million. In
2000, expenditures for boarding
were combined with training fees and
totaled $54.8 million. For 2005, adding
training fees into the boarding fees
generates a total of $213 million.
Third was feed expenses with $119
million spent on grain, hay, and mixed
or formula feeds, an increase of 18
percent over 2000. Feed expenditures included $47.4 million for grain,
$55.7 million for hay, and $15.6
million for mixed or formula feeds.
Average per equine was $602.
Other leading expenditures were
property taxes ($82.6 million),
veterinary and health expenses
($74.0 million), and maintenance
and repair expenses ($69.9 million).
New categories added for this year’s
survey were values for home-grown
bedding, grain, and hay. Homegrown bedding value was $2.3
million, while value of home-grown
grain was $1.5 million. Home-grown
hay was valued at $24.7 million.
Capital expenditures of $958 million
accounted for 47 percent of all expenses The largest portion of capital
expenditures was expenditures for
purchase of land and capital improvements at $490 million. In 2000, land
and capital improvement purchases
totaled $63.0 million. Included in this
figure are new real estate purchases
and improvements to land and buildings
for which the cost can be depreciated.
Purchases of equine came in second
- 26 -
with $254 million spent, compared
to
$49.5
million
in
2000.
Equipment purchases totaled $214
million, compared to $68.3 million
in 2000. Included as equine related
equipment purchases during the
year were trucks, tractors, manure
spreaders, horse vans, trailers, portable
stalls, starting gates, hot walkers,
treadmills, sulkies, carts, buggies,
motor homes, campers and autos.
REVENUES
This was the first year revenues generated from an equine operation were
enumerated. Total revenues generated were $445 million. A large portion ($158 million, or 35 percent) of this
total came from revenues generated
by providing equine services, such as
boarding, sales preparation, trail riding or recreational services, equine
judging, and guest farm services.
Second highest value ($118 million) was revenues generated from
equine sales, including equipment, feed and manure sales.
Revenues generated from training,
including riding lessons, training
and conditioning, and therapeutic
riding, came in third with total
revenues of $75.3 million.
The remainder came from winnings
($60.8 million) and breeding services ($32.8 million).
Table 18. EQUINE RELATED EXPENDITURES, NEW YORK, 2000 AND 2005
Total Expenditures
Expense Category
2000
2005
Thousand Dollars
OPERATING EXPENSES
Boarding
Training
Breeding Fees and Related Expenses
Farrier
Veterinary and Health Expenses
Shipping and Travel
Purchased Bedding
Value of Home-grown Bedding
Purchased Grain
Value of Home-grown Grain
Purchased Hay
Value of Home-grown Hay
Mixed or Formula Feeds
Medicine
Supplies
Manure Disposal
Fees and Payments
Advertising and Marketing
Contract Services
Maintenance and Repair
Utilities and Fuels
Insurance Premiums
Rent/Lease Expenses
Miscellaneous
Property Taxes
Interest
Labor
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Purchases of Equine
Purchases of Equipment
Purchases of Land and Capital
Improvements
TOTAL
1/
2/
3/
4/
Average per Equine
Percent Spent
in New York 1/
2000
Percent
Dollars
522,860
54,800
2/
22,000
23,400
32,590
14,810
18,750
NA
24,920
NA
59,120
NA
16,700
3/
11,050
NA
12,780
4/
4/
37,190
22,930
20,290
10,920
6,410
37,910
7,970
88,320
1,101,940
155,920
57,330
28,310
52,160
74,000
31,010
32,300
2,330
47,360
1,490
55,660
24,740
15,630
14,870
25,400
6,350
29,520
7,440
8,120
69,910
35,140
30,780
34,150
NA
82,580
39,190
168,810
91
95
90
71
95
87
82
90
NA
97
NA
94
NA
85
87
90
93
82
85
96
85
95
82
88
NA
97
98
NA
3,112
326
2/
131
139
194
88
112
NA
148
NA
352
NA
99
3/
66
NA
76
4/
4/
221
137
121
65
38
226
47
526
180,790
49,460
68,320
958,130
254,000
213,690
86
69
90
1,076
294
407
63,010
490,440
92
375
703,650
2,060,070
88
4,188
2005 labor expenses are not included in Percent Spent in New York column.
Training included with Boarding in 2000.
Medicine included with Health in 2000.
Advertising and Marketing and Contract Services included in Miscellaneous in 2000.
- 27 -
2005
5,594
791
291
144
265
376
157
164
12
240
8
283
126
79
75
129
32
150
38
41
355
178
156
173
NA
419
199
857
Table 19. EQUINE RELATED REVENUES, NEW YORK, 2005
Equine Activities Generating Revenue
Gross Receipts
Thousand Dollars
SALES
117,830
Horse Sales
95,140
Equipment Sales/Rental/Lease
13,000
Feed Sales
9,600
Manure Sales
90
TRAINING
75,310
Riding Lessons/Clinics
39,330
Training/Conditioning
33,100
Therapeutic Riding
2,880
BREEDING
32,810
Mare Care
22,900
Stud Fees
9,910
SERVICES
158,390
Boarding
139,420
Sales Preparation
1,770
Trail Riding/Recreational Services
16,220
Equine Judging
510
Guest Farm/Bed and Breakfast/Tourism
470
WINNINGS
60,790
Horse Shows/Competitions
5,990
Rodeo Winnings
680
Racing Purses
54,120
TOTAL
445,130
- 28 -
EQUINE RELATED LABOR
There were 12,500 equine related
positions for which employees
were hired during 2005 in New
York, 10 percent higher than the
11,200 positions in 2000. Of this, 54
percent, or 6,800, were considered
part-time. A part-time or seasonal
employee is defined as a person
working less than 150 days a year.
of these employees were part-time.
Employees that performed multiple
duties were counted only in the
category for which the most important
service to the operator was provided.
Full-time employees totaled 5,700,
54 percent higher than 2000’s total
of 3,700. Of these, 28 percent, or
1,600, were employed as managers
or assistant managers. Grooms or
exercise riders totaled 1,400, or 25
percent of full-time employees. There
were 900 trainers or assistant trainers,
and 200 riding or driving instructors.
Cash labor expenditures of $157
million included cash wages as well
as the employer’s share of Social
Security taxes, worker’s compensation,
insurance, pension and unemployment
compensation. The estimated value
of non-cash items provided to workers
during 2005 totaled $12.2 million.
These non-cash items included such
things as housing, meals, clothing,
horse board, lessons, and other
benefits. A total of 2,500 workers, or 20
percent, were provided with housing.
Of the total number, most employees
fell into the “other” category. For
the most part, these were general
farm workers, persons hired for
cleaning of stalls, tending equine, or
general crop workers. The majority
A couple of new categories were
added to the 2005 survey. For the first
new category, respondents were asked
about private contractors working on the
respondent’s equine operation. A total
of 3,700 private contractors worked
- 29 -
on equine operations in New York in
2005, most of them as “other” type
of workers. Horse trainers/assistant
trainers and grooms/exercise riders
had 700 contractors each. There were
500 riding/driving instructors. A private
contractor is defined as a person
whose contract terms are defined by
the individual providing service, and the
individual is not on the company payroll.
The second new category asked for
information about volunteers working
on the equine operation. According
to the survey, there were 11,100
volunteers providing their services to
equine operations during 2005. Of
these, 6,900 volunteers, or 62 percent,
were working as “other” type of
workers. Grooms/exercise riders made
up another 3,600, or 32 percent. The
remainder was managers/assistant
managers, horse trainers/assistant
trainers, and riding/driving instructors.
Volunteers are described as any worker
not paid in cash or non-cash items.
Table 20. EQUINE RELATED LABOR, NEW YORK, 2005
Category
Full-time
(150 days
or more)
Part-time
(less than
150 days)
Private
Contractor
Volunteers/
Student
Workers
Total
Number of Workers
TYPE OF WORKER
Manager/Assistant Manager
1,600
700
300
200
2,800
900
300
700
300
2,200
1,400
900
700
3,600
6,600
200
500
500
100
1,300
Other Type of Worker
1,600
4,400
1,500
6,900
14,400
TOTAL WORKERS
5,700
6,800
3,700
11,100
27,300
Horse Trainer/Assistant Trainer
Groom, exercise rider, etc.
Riding/Driving Instructor
Workers for whom housing was provided.....................................................................................................................
2,500
Volunteer hours worked ................................................................................................................................................
1,830,500
Operator and unpaid family member hours worked .....................................................................................................
43,200,000
EXPENDITURES FOR LABOR DURING 2005
Thousand Dollars
Cash Labor Expenditures .............................................................................................................................................
156,600
Value of Non-Cash Items Provided to Workers ............................................................................................................
12,210
Total Labor Expenditures ..............................................................................................................................................
168,810
- 30 -
OPERATOR INFORMATION
In 2005, respondents were asked
In New York State, operators have
and close behind are those opera-
for general information about the
had equine at their present loca-
tions that make between $100,000 and
operator.
tion for an average of 16 years.
$249,999 per year (7,600 operations).
The average number of years New
Of the 33,000 equine operations in
Approximately 25 percent of the gross
York operators have owned equine is
New York State, most equine opera-
household income for all equine
21. This number takes into account
tors (11,300, or 34 percent) have a
operations in New York is equine-related.
those operators who have owned
gross household income of between
This number ranges from zero percent for
equine all their life, those that had
$50,000 and $99,999.
Second are
those who have equine only for pleasure
equine in other states, and those
those that made between $25,000
to 100 percent for those operations
who are new to the equine industry.
and $49,999 with 8,000 operations,
whose income comes solely from equine.
Table 21. OPERATOR INFORMATION, NEW YORK, 2005
Number of
Operations
Average
Number of years operator has owned equine
21
Number of years operator has had equine at the present location
16
Gross Household Income of operations
$0 - $24,999
3,250
$25,000 - $49,999
8,000
$50,000 - $99,999
11,300
$100,000 - $249,999
7,600
$250,000 - $499,999
1,700
$500,000 - $999,999
650
$1,000,000 or more
500
Percent of equine-related income for all operations
25
- 31 -
EQUINE INVENTORY
December 31, 2005
- 32 -
Table 22. EQUINE INVENTORY AND VALUE BY COUNTY,
NEW YORK, 2000 AND 2005
County
Head
Sept. 1, 2000
Total Value
Dec. 31, 2005
Rank in 2005
Sept. 1, 2000
Head
Dec. 31, 2005
Rank in 2005
1,000 dollars
Jefferson
Lewis
St. Lawrence
Northern, Total
4,300
1,200
2,900
8,400
3,000
1,000
3,400
7,400
29
56
25
13,760
3,300
8,990
26,050
8,380
2,670
9,240
20,290
45
56
40
Clinton
Essex
Franklin
Hamilton
Warren
Northeast, Total
1,500
1,000
800
100
1,200
4,600
2,200
1,700
1,200
100
1,200
6,400
39
49
53
58
54
6,150
3,100
2,560
180
5,100
17,090
8,540
7,190
4,810
230
9,770
30,540
42
50
55
58
39
Erie
Genesee
Livingston
Monroe
Niagara
Ontario
Orleans
Seneca
Wayne
Wyoming
Yates
Western, Total
7,200
2,100
3,300
5,700
3,000
3,700
1,400
900
2,000
1,800
1,200
32,300
7,900
1,800
4,400
5,100
3,100
4,100
2,400
1,300
3,500
2,400
1,900
37,900
4
44
11
10
27
15
37
52
23
38
42
48,240
10,080
13,200
27,930
12,000
22,570
4,060
1,800
6,600
5,220
3,480
155,180
34,700
8,110
19,760
23,080
12,320
18,510
9,100
4,870
13,790
9,880
8,500
162,620
12
47
22
18
32
24
41
54
29
38
43
Cayuga
Chenango
Cortland
Herkimer
Madison
Oneida
Onondaga
Oswego
Otsego
Central, Total
2,200
2,900
1,600
1,600
2,600
5,500
3,700
2,000
3,500
25,600
2,800
3,100
2,200
1,900
4,100
5,900
5,400
2,500
4,400
32,300
32
28
40
43
16
7
9
36
12
7,700
10,440
3,680
4,800
12,220
31,350
17,760
11,000
11,200
110,150
12,830
15,880
10,380
7,990
20,630
36,140
27,490
11,050
21,300
163,690
31
26
35
48
20
11
15
33
19
Albany
Fulton
Montgomery
Rensselaer
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Washington
Eastern, Total
2,900
1,000
2,400
2,500
11,800
1,500
2,000
2,700
26,800
3,000
1,100
2,900
3,600
11,000
1,800
1,800
3,900
29,100
30
55
31
21
1
45
46
18
15,080
4,700
7,680
12,750
317,420
7,200
10,600
13,230
388,660
29,320
6,860
20,490
34,140
250,520
19,420
15,140
40,450
416,340
14
51
21
13
1
23
27
10
1/ Includes Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens, and Richmond.
- 33 -
Table 22. EQUINE INVENTORY AND VALUE BY COUNTY,
NEW YORK, 2000 AND 2005 (Continued)
County
Head
Sept. 1, 2000
Total Value
Dec. 31, 2005
Rank in 2005
Sept. 1, 2000
Head
Dec. 31, 2005
Rank in 2005
1,000 dollars
Allegany
2,300
2,600
35
7,360
6,720
52
Cattaraugus
3,500
3,800
19
9,800
9,900
37
Chautauqua
3,800
4,300
13
10,640
10,920
34
Steuben
4,500
4,000
17
13,050
10,240
36
14,100
14,700
40,850
37,780
Broome
2,500
3,500
24
14,250
18,330
25
Chemung
1,700
1,700
50
7,310
7,220
49
Schuyler
1,100
1,400
51
2,200
5,500
53
Tioga
1,600
2,000
41
5,120
8,490
44
Tompkins
2,900
2,800
33
11,310
13,430
30
Southern, Total
9,800
11,400
40,190
52,970
Columbia
2,400
4,300
14
63,600
46,800
8
Delaware
2,200
3,600
22
7,260
14,100
28
Dutchess
7,000
9,500
2
126,000
132,400
3
Greene
2,000
1,800
47
11,400
8,250
46
Orange
6,800
8,500
3
59,840
113,250
5
Putnam
1,100
1,800
48
21,450
24,960
16
600
400
57
5,400
2,200
57
Sullivan
2,300
3,200
26
20,470
24,610
17
Ulster
4,200
5,600
8
35,280
46,510
9
Westchester
3,500
3,800
20
121,100
87,040
7
32,100
42,500
471,800
500,120
Nassau
5,400
6,300
5
287,280
221,030
2
Suffolk
5,800
6,200
6
63,800
126,660
4
New York 1/
Long Island/NYC, Total
3,100
2,800
34
100,750
99,000
6
14,300
15,300
451,830
446,690
168,000
197,000
1,701,800
1,831,040
Southwest, Total
Rockland
Southeast, Total
TOTAL
1/ Includes Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens, and Richmond.
- 34 -
THE EQUINE INDUSTRY’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE
NEW YORK STATE ECONOMY
Economic Analysis Performed by
Nelson Bills and David Kay, Cornell University
Figure 2. Distribution of equine operating
expenditures, New York State, 2005
Instate
Out of state
Operating expense
Boarding
Feed
Property taxes
Veterinary
Repair & maintenance
Training
Hay
Farrier
Grain
Interest
Fuel & utilities
All other
95%
93%
97%
87%
85%
89%
94%
95%
97%
98%
95%
85%
0%
20%
10%
40%
30%
60%
50%
80%
70%
100%
90%
Percent
Economic issues are a focal point
of the 2005 survey and are reported
on in this section. The contribution
of the equine sector to the New
York State economy was analyzed
using the economic impact software
program IMPLAN® (Impact Analysis
for Planning). The IMPLAN® software
allows economic analysts to estimate
structural relationships between
economic sectors in a regional
economy. The model is derived from
national level data maintained by the
US Department of Commerce. This
federal agency has been estimating
input-output relationships for the US
for more than a half-century. In the
1970s, with funding from the US Forest
Service, IMPLAN® was developed to
allow applications at state and substate levels (Lindall and Olson, 2007).
Applications using this model for statelevel analysis are now commonplace
in the academic community and in the
general business community as well.
A detailed description of our modeling
procedures are appended to this report.
The model addresses backward
linkages between any single economic
sector and other sectors of the wider
New York economy. The analysis
proceeds through the calculation of
economic multipliers. The economic
- 35 -
multiplier is an important tool in
economic impact analysis. Formal
study and our own practical
experience indicate that industries are
interdependent and that expansions or
contractions in one industry are likely
to have some far-reaching implications.
A substantial share of total gross
output in the New York State economy
is comprised of cash business
expenses. These are transactions
between businesses to acquire the
inputs needed to deliver additional
product or service to a final user.
The object of multiplier analysis is to
trace the inter-relationships between
sectors and construct quantitative
measures of the impact associated
with increasing or decreasing a line of
economic activity. The idea traces to
economic base theory, which classifies
goods and services sold outside the
region’s boundaries as “exports”,
and hence, basic.
Conversely,
goods and services produced by
the nonbasic sector are consumed
within the region’s boundaries.
Expansion of the basic sector of the
economy necessarily entails added
production in these support industries,
particularly in terms of intermediate
inputs, all of which adds to the overall
development of a regional economy.
The economic multiplier summarizes
This distinction between instate and
own some real estate for business
the cumulative (direct, indirect, and
out-of-state expenditures is absolutely
purposes in border states and
induced) effect of an initial change in
critical
economic
about 3 percent of all property tax
final demand plus the resulting series
multiplier calculations.
Out-of-state
payments go out of state. Looking
of successive rounds of spending
expenditures
leakage
across other expense categories,
within the local economy. It is the
from the state economy that cannot
instate expenses are also relatively
ratio between the total change in
be recovered and circulated among
high-usually 85 percent or more.
spending and the initial change
business entities instate. Economic
in final demand (or the income or
sectors with large amounts of leakage
Information on the instate cash
employment implied by it). Multipliers
contribute relatively little to total state
expenditures paves the way for
are constructed based on a “snapshot”
income and employment compared
estimates of the total output generated
of a regional economy. That is, the
to industries that spend a substantial
by the New York State equine industry.
economic multiplier is governed by
share of their business expense either
That estimate is reported in Table 1,
the pattern of economic transactions
locally or instate. Traditionally, farming
and shows that total gross output
between firms and the final users
enterprises
high
directly attributable to equine in 2005
of their products for a single year.
marks on instate expenses. That is,
amounted to $856 million. Accounting
Lots of transactions between in-state
multipliers have been relatively large
for
business firms make for relatively large
because farm businesses have tended
stemming from this gross output
economic multipliers; relatively fewer
to purchase relatively large shares of
generated an additional $236 million
transactions mean smaller multipliers.
business inputs locally or at least within
for the New York State economy.
New York State. These arrangements
The IMPLAN® model also allows an
The point of departure for multiplier
of course, shift from year to year and
estimate of the induced changes in
analysis is an assessment of the
from one economic sector to the next.
State output that stem from additional
when
making
represent
have
received
geographic distribution of business
indirect
industry
transactions
household expenditures attributable to
expenditures. For this study, survey
Responses gathered from equine
the New York State equine industry.
respondents were asked to supply
operators suggest that their cash
Taking these induced expenditures
information
business expenses are primarily
into account adds another $285
Then,
instate as shown in Figure 2. Not
million to total State output.
each respondent was asked to
unexpectedly, nearly 100 percent of
importance for the New York State
allocate those expenditures to input
all property tax payments are made
economy, then, measured in 2005
suppliers instate and out-of-state.
within state. Equine operators do
dollars, is on the order of $1.38 billion.
on
major
categories
of cash business expense.
- 36 -
Total
Table 23. ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NEW YORK STATE
EQUINE INDUSTRY, 2005
(in 2005 dollar values)
Unit
Total
Effect
Direct
Effect
Indirect
Effect
Induced
Effect
Industry output
Dollars ($1,000)
1,376,666
855,067
236,173
285,426
Value added
Dollars ($1,000)
717,252
413,819
127,220
176,213
Employment
Number
15,233
11,616
1,400
2,216
Item
Another useful measure of these indirect
economy.
Eliminating those and
added measurements correspond to
and induced impacts is value-added.
focusing on final payments, whether
the equine industry’s contribution to
Value added indices avoid the double
to households who provide labor
gross state product. In 2005, according
counting that comes from pegging
services, imports of goods and services
to the modeling results reported in
estimates to changes in total gross
from out-of-state sources, or payments
Table 1, total value-added attributable
output. The latter includes estimates of
to owners of capital resources, add
to the New York State equine industry,
all intermediate transactions between
precision to an evaluation of any
after taking into account the direct,
economic sectors in New York State
economic sector’s contribution. Value
indirect,
of
Figure 3. economic multipliers for the
New York State equine sector, 2005
Direct & indirect effects
Direct, indirect, & induced effects
Economic multiplier
induced
goods
and
effects
services,
amounted to more than $717 million.
Another critical aspect of industry
structure goes to questions about
labor use. For this reason, it is helpful
2
to arrange input-output modeling
1.73
1.61
1.5
equine
and
1.31
1.28
1.31
1.12
results using employment rather than
total gross output for value added
as a unit of measure. Results for the
1
New York State equine sector are
reported, once again, in Table 1.
0.5
Using labor to output ratios reported
0
Total gross output
Value added
Employment
Source: Estimates derived from IMPLAN
in the IMPLAN® model, we estimate
that over 11,600 jobs are generated
on equine farms in New York State.
- 37 -
This result is 7 percent lower than the
12,500 employee estimate generated
by the 2005 survey, probably for
several
reasons.
Employment
estimates can vary by source because
of differences in definition. Definitions
are a challenge throughout farming and
agriculture because of the seasonality
of employment, dependence on
family labor, and the use of part-time
employees. In the equine sector, the
employment picture is clouded further
by the use of volunteers on many
equine farms. But, in addition, the
survey respondents were not asked to
identify the location or residence of their
employees. A fraction of all employees,
however, likely reside in border states
and commute to jobs on New York State
equine farms. After taking indirect and
induced changes in employment into
account, our IMPLAN® model results
suggest that the equine sector accounts
for about 15,200 jobs statewide.
Rearranging these results yields
economic multipliers using, in turn,
gross output, value-added, and total
employment as a unit of measure
as in Figure 3. Each gives its own
impression of the generative effects
- 38 -
associated with the sector. The valueadded multipliers are the most robust
by a small margin, with each additional
dollar of value-added estimated to
generate $1.31 after taking indirect
effects into account. Building in
induced effects on value added brings
the multiplier estimate to $1.73. Output
multipliers occupy a middle ground
with employment measures suggesting
relatively weak indirect and induced
effects for the industry. This suggests
that a relatively large proportion of
equine business expenses go to instate input providers that feature
either relatively low wages or relatively
high
output/employment
ratios.
EQUINE SURVEY PROCEDURES
PURPOSE
The chief purpose of the 2005
Equine Survey was to update the
data collected in the 2000 survey.
The equine industry has changed
substantially since the last survey in
2000, according to industry leaders.
The survey documented changes in the
industry since that time and provided
updated information to help measure
the contribution of horses, ponies,
mules and donkeys to the New York
economy. Some additional items were
added to further evaluate the impact
the equine industry has on the state.
DESIGN
The survey was designed in a manner
to ensure reliable coverage of all
places with equine. A comprehensive
list of all horse operations was
compiled from many sources,
including veterinarians and equine
organizations. A list of 26,800 names
was developed and used for the survey.
To compensate for any incompleteness
in the list, a land area sample consisting
of 289 segments of land was selected.
Each segment was from about onetenth to one square mile (64-640
acres) in size and was canvassed
for equine. Names of all persons
with equine inside the segment were
matched against the list of 26,800
names. The equine in segments for
those persons not found on the list
were expanded to give a measure
of incompleteness of the list. This is
known as multiple-frame sampling.
METHODOLOGY
In the first phase of the survey,
questionnaires were mailed in
December 2005 to all persons on the
list of operators. This questionnaire
asked primarily the number of horses
by breed and the total value for each
breed on their operation on December
31, 2005. This system provided two
purposes. First, we were able to obtain
the number and value of horses by breed
for these operations. Second, we were
able to stratify the list by size in order
to sub-sample these operations for the
important second phase of the survey.
Screening of the land area segments
was conducted by trained enumerators
during May and June of 2006. Each
operation with land in the segments was
asked for the number of equine on the
land within the segment on December
31, 2005, and the type of operation.
All known operations were sent a
questionnaire. Key persons familiar
with the equine industry also distributed
questionnaires to pick up data for
operations not already added to the
list. In order to improve response on
this phase of the survey, as many as
possible of the non-respondents to
the mailed survey were contacted by
telephone. With the mail response
and the telephone follow-up, we were
able to get completed reports from
approximately 60 percent of the list.
SUMMARIZATION
In the second phase, a stratified
systematic sample of 2,500 names
was selected from the operations who
responded to the survey’s first phase.
Respondents were assigned to one
of six inventory size groups or strata:
1-4, 5-9, 10-19, 20-49, 50 or more
equine, or no equine on operation
but equine expenses existed (owners
that board out their horses). Sampling
rates varied from 4 percent for the
operations that had no equine but
did have expenses to 100 percent
for those operations with 50 or more
equine. Race tracks were not sampled
for the economic phase of the survey.
The comprehensive questionnaire
used in the second phase of the survey,
which included economic questions,
was mailed to the entire sub-sample
in July of 2006. Operations that did
not respond by mail were contacted by
telephone and/or personal visits during
August, September, and October
of 2006. We received responses
from almost 60 percent of this group.
- 39 -
All questionnaires were manually reviewed before being computer edited and
summarized. The data from the 289 area
segments were expanded and added to
the list of expansions after eliminating any
operations that were already on the list.
This procedure resulted in a multipleframe indicator, which was the basis
for estimating the total number of
equine in New York.
Summary
results from the first phase of the
survey were used to set county level
estimates and the estimates for breed
numbers. The results of the survey’s
second phase provided the basis for
setting estimates of equine usage,
assets, expenditures and hired labor.
RESULTS
Estimates from a sample survey
will vary depending upon the
units selected in the sample. The
variations in the expansions are
measured by the relative error of
the estimate which is the estimate
divided by the statistical sampling
error. The relative error gives an
indication of the confidence that can
be assigned to the survey expansions.
Statistically, this survey was designed
to estimate the equine population
at the State level. The relative
error for the total number of equine
was 2.9 percent, compared to 7.8
percent in the 2000 survey and
6.9 percent in the 1988 survey.
PHOTOGRAPHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 1 - Photo by Annette Ward, owner/photographer
Page 4 - Photo by cheyhunty@msn.com, owner, Millie Rowse, photographer.
Page 5 - Photo by T. Pinkerton, owner, Donna Shelatree, photographer.
http:/www.stallionstation.com/whisperinghill
Photo by Dave Freeman, owner, Ginny Freeman, photographer, http://cabaa.org
Page 6 - Photo by Dr. Christopher L. Nyberg, Morrisville State College
Photo by Shelby Herrera/owner/photographer, http://www.jbarstx.com
Pages 9, 11, 12, 14, - Photos by Laura Hughes, photographer
Page 16 - Photo by Fiona Farrell, photographer
Page 17 - Photo by Vickie Andrew, owner/photographer, http://mvandrewranch.gizywizard.com/
Page 30 - Photo by Judy Renbarger, photographer
Cover
Laura Hughes, photographer
Barbara D. Livingston, photographer, barbaralivingston.com
Lindsey, owner/photographer
John & Karen Welch, owner/photographer
Romy & John Morgant, owner, Jennifer K. Pierce, photographer, www.bayouquarterhorses.com
Judy Renbarger, photographer
Jennifer S. Barr, owner/photographer
Katharina Vob, owner/photographer
Shelby Herrera, owner/photographer
New York
AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE
STAFF
Stephen C. Ropel, Director
Blair L. Smith, Deputy Director
Elizabeth A. Fish, Administrative Technician
Barbara S. Marx, Keyboard Specialist
Sterling D. Shrader, Statistical Assistant
Karlyn R. Tuczynski, Administrative Technician
ESTIMATES
William R. Blackson
Marian J. Agars
Sandra L. Alikonis
Cecilia L. Carhart
Bryan S. Combs
Amanda N. Dawson
Kathryn D. Gonzalez
Kathy D. King
William G. Lemmons
Kathleen M. McGrouty
Keith R. Miller
Joseph E. Morse
SURVEYS, LSF AND DATA PROCESSING
Robin D. Gannon
Patricia A. Haseck
Tierra N. Mobley
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Alicia K. Ferri
Vicki L. Crogan
For additional information and statistical data pertaining to the agricultural industry gathered
by the State of New York or United States Department of Agriculture, write or call:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE
New York Field Office
10B Airline Drive
Albany, New York 12235-0001
Telephone
(518) 457-5570
E-Mail: nass-ny@nass.usda.gov
Home Page: www.nass.usda.gov/ny
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Equine 2005.indd |
Author | marxba |
File Modified | 2008-01-09 |
File Created | 2008-01-04 |