Chromium (VI) Standards for General Industry (29 CFR 1910.1026), Shipyard Employment (29 CFR 1915.1026), and Construction (29 CFR 1926.1126)

ICR 201004-1218-006

OMB: 1218-0252

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2010-04-23
Supporting Statement A
2009-10-27
Supplementary Document
2009-10-27
Supplementary Document
2009-10-27
Supplementary Document
2009-10-27
Supplementary Document
2009-10-27
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
Supplementary Document
2009-09-03
ICR Details
1218-0252 201004-1218-006
Historical Active 200909-1218-001
DOL/OSHA 1218-0252(2009)
Chromium (VI) Standards for General Industry (29 CFR 1910.1026), Shipyard Employment (29 CFR 1915.1026), and Construction (29 CFR 1926.1126)
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 05/04/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 04/23/2010
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2013 01/31/2013 01/31/2013
1,159,324 0 1,159,324
787,894 0 725,319
47,751,607 0 47,751,607

The standard requires employers to monitor employee exposure to Chromium (VI), to provide medical surveillance, and to establish and maintain accurate records of employee exposure to Chromium (VI) and employee medical records. These records will be used by employers, employees, physicians and the Government to ensure that employees are not being harmed by exposure to Chromium.

US Code: 29 USC 651 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
   US Code: 29 USC 657 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
   US Code: 29 USC 655 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  74 FR 29517 06/22/2009
74 FR 56216 10/30/2009
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,159,324 1,159,324 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 787,894 725,319 0 62,575 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 47,751,607 47,751,607 0 0 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
There is an overall decrease in burden hours of 488,866 hours. The reduction is due to decreasing the total number of plants required to notify laundry personnel of the presence of Cr(VI), reducing the number of employees affected by initial medical examination and additional testing requirements, and reducing the time it takes to establish and prepare initial exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records. An administrative error of +100 hours has been identified which has increased the currently approved burden hours from 1,214,085 to 1,214,185. There was an overall cost decrease of $85,466,794. The decrease is a result of employers no longer being required to perform initial exposure monitoring and no longer needing to make initial purchases of warning labels, bags and containers, and fewer employees require initial comprehensive medical exams because of abnormal medical exam results.

$10,858
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Jamaa Hill 202-693-1965 hill.jamaa@dol.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
04/23/2010


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy