Supporting Justification for OMB Clearance of
Strengthening Communities Fund Program Evaluation
REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY CLEARANCE
Part A: Justification for the Collection of Baseline Data
March 2010
The Administration for Children & Families (ACF) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is conducting the Strengthening Communities Fund (SCF) Program Evaluation, a new initiative funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 to enable nonprofit organizations to contribute to the economic recovery and help federal, state, and local governments ensure that the information and services described in the Recovery Act reach disadvantaged and hard-to-serve populations. We now seek OMB approval for program-specific grantee data collection tools.
Given this Administration’s commitment to transparency and accountability, it is essential that ACF be able to collect grantee data to inform the public of the impact of this Recovery Act initiative. It would create public harm if this program were not captured and quantified through output and outcome measures as are required for the purposes of Administrative Code 2 CFR 215 and the public website Recovery.gov. Failing to collect SCF performance and progress data would prevent the Administration, the Congress, and the public from obtaining any meaningful information about the SCF program. Additionally, without the requested data collection, it will not be possible to complete proper analysis and assessment of the SCF program to determine its benefits to the public and guide future policy decisions.
Legal or Administrative Requirements that Necessitate the Collection
The Strengthening Communities Fund initiative was authorized under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), ACF, Children Families Services Programs, (4) as follows: “(4) $50,000,000 for carrying out activities under section 1110 of the Social Security Act.” The purpose of the SCF initiative is to enable nonprofit organizations, through capacity building, to contribute to the economic recovery, and to help state, local and Tribal governments ensure that the information and services described in the Recovery Act effectively reach disadvantaged and hard to serve populations. To accomplish the objective of the appropriations, ACF seeks OMB approval of a program specific data collection tool to collect grantee information regarding the impact of the program.
If this request is approved, the Program Performance Reports (PPR) for the two sets of SCF program grantees, Nonprofit and Government grantees, would be collected.
The Nonprofit grantee data to be collected includes an organization profile for each grantee and subrecipient, as well as project information including descriptions of social service programs benefiting from services provided through SCF. The PPR collects primary recipient data for baseline, target and actual-to-date progress for defined output measures including hours of technical assistance provided, hours of training provided, amount of financial assistance provided, and the number of organizations assisted. In addition, the instrument captures important subrecipient project milestones including individual plans and outcome measures.
The SCF Government grantee data to be collected includes social service priority areas, project objectives and goals, project description, and associated indicators for capacity building efforts. The SCF Government Capacity Building program differs from its nonprofit counterpart in that it prohibits award of funds to subrecipients, and it allows the governmental grantee the discretion to use SCF funds to build its own capacity to collaborate with nonprofit social service providers in its jurisdiction. The proposed tool collects base line, target and actual progress-to-date for capacity-building services provided, including the number of organizations targeted with outreach and information, as well as the number of organizations receiving training and technical assistance, the respective hours of each service provided, grant management activity and technology deployed. The proposed tool also provides for the reporting of organizations benefiting from the government grantee through description of persons served, service expansion, success rates, and interagency collaborations.
The data will serve several purposes. Information related to the impact of the program will help ACF to evaluate the effectiveness of this initiative and provide the necessary tools to allow for accountability of the Recovery Act funds. This information will also allow the Administration to publicly communicate the impact and achievements of the program, and make future policy decisions on the basis of such knowledge. Data will also be used to verify progress toward goals identified in approved grantee proposals and work plans. The proposed instruments provide information needed for monitoring and assessing grantee performance, and allow for prompt action when needed to ensure satisfactory achievement of the goals and objectives set out in SCF program announcements.
A3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
The data collection plan reflects sensitivity to issues of efficiency, accuracy, and respondent burden. By the 3rd Quarter FY 2010 data collection, ACF will be able to implement electronic collection. This electronic submission platform will facilitate ease of reporting as well as internal data review and monitoring, while reducing the burden on grantees.
There is no similar information since the SCF program is a new initiative funded under the Recovery Act of 2009.
Of the 84 total grantees under the SCF program, 35 are considered nonprofit grantees and 49 are government organizations, which may be state, local, or tribal. The data collection plan is designed to minimize burden on those grantees that may be considered smaller organizations through the use of an electronic platform for data responses. Additionally, ACF staff convened a grantee conference in late January of 2010 to orient grantees to the data reporting expectations and engage the grantees in a dialogue about these reporting expectations prior to finalizing the included data collection tool, to accommodate grantee feedback.
The SCF program is a time-limited initiative as funded under the Recovery Act of 2009. Therefore timely approval of the data collection tool is essential to allow ACF to gather necessary information from grantees for accountability and communication purposes, before the program’s authorization expires at the end of FY 2010.
There are no special circumstances for the proposed data collection.
The emergency 60-day notice was published in the Federal Register on March 29, 2010. See Attachment A. At this time there are no comments or responses to questions.
At the end of January 2010, ACF hosted a conference for all SCF grantees to orient them to the data reporting and collection expectations. In addition to providing grantees with technical assistance, this conference also allowed for a dialogue to discuss the data reporting expectations prior to the finalizing of the proposed data collection tool.
No payment or gift will be made to respondents during data collection.
The privacy of respondents will be protected to the fullest extent of the law.
There are no sensitive questions planned for this data collection.
The Program Performance Report (PPR) information collection does not impose a financial burden on SCF grantee respondents. Respondents will not incur any burden other than the time spent answering the questions contained in the questionnaires.
Exhibit A12.1 summarizes the reporting burden on study participants. Questionnaire response times were estimated based on similar PPR reports administrated by other similar ACF programs. The annual burden for questionnaire response is estimated from the quarterly report requirement and the time required to complete the questionnaires. The total annual burden is expected to be 336 hours.
To compute the total estimated annual cost, total burden hours were multiplied by the average hourly wage for each adult participant, based on median weekly wages from the current Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey estimates (first quarter of 2009 provided for full-time employees over the age of 25). For most grantees, the respondent will be a member of a nonprofit organization or government entity. For these respondents, we used the median salary for individuals with a bachelor’s degree ($25.60 per hour) as the most common minimum education level of a diverse group (to include program directors, community agency leaders, and local evaluators and research assistants).
Exhibit A12.1. Reporting Burden on Study Participants
Instrument |
Annual
|
Number of Responses per Respondent |
Average Burden Hours per Response |
Total Annual Burden Hours |
Average Hourly Wage of Respondents |
Total
Annual Burden |
Nonprofit Capacity Building Program Performance Progress Report (PPR)
|
35 |
4 |
1 |
140 |
$25.60 |
$3,584.00 |
Government Capacity Building Program PPR
|
49 |
4 |
1 |
196 |
$25.60 |
$5,017.60 |
Total |
|
|
|
336 |
|
$8,601.60 |
These information collection activities do not place any additional cost on respondents.
Costs for the proposed data collection including instrument development, collection, and analysis and report preparation are estimated at $110,543 annually.
This is a new collection; therefore no program adjustments are anticipated based on this data collection.
The SCF program evaluation will be conducted over the life of the SCF initiative, which expires at the end of FY 2010. The first full data collection, for which ACF is seeking approval, will take place for the second quarter of FY 2010, which closes March 31, 2010 with responses required by April 30, 2010.
ACF expects to publish the results of this data collection as required under the reporting guidance related to the Recovery Act, including, but not limited to, the publicly accessible website Recovery.gov. This information will also be used for internal monitoring and reporting requirements.
All instruments will display the OMB number and the expiration date.
No exceptions are necessary for this information collection.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Justification for OMB Clearance of Evaluation of Pregnancy Prevention Approaches Part A: Justification for the Collec |
| Author | Mary Hess |
| Last Modified By | Emily Ball |
| File Modified | 2010-03-29 |
| File Created | 2010-03-29 |