Download:
pdf |
pdf Butler, Brett J. 2008. Family Forest Owners of the United States, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep.
NRS-27. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern
Research Station. 72 p.
This report summarizes results from the U.S. Forest Service’s National Woodland Owner
Survey of the estimated 10 million family forest owners who own 264 million acres (35
percent) of forest land in the United States. We collected information between 2002 and
2006 on family forest owners’ forest holding characteristics, ownership histories, ownership
objectives, forest uses, forest management practices, preferred methods for receiving
information, concerns, future intentions, and demographics. National, regional, and state
summary tables are included.
KEY WORDS: landowner survey, National Woodland Owner Survey, nonindustrial private
forest owner
The Author
BRETT J. BUTLER, research forester, received a B.S. degree in natural resource
management and engineering from the University of Connecticut in 1995 and a Ph.D. in
forest science from Oregon State University in 2005. He joined the U.S. Forest Service in
1998 and the Northern Research Station’s Forest Inventory and Analysis program in 2000.
He coordinates the U.S. Forest Service’s National Woodland Owner Survey and co-leads the
Family Forest Research Center collocated with the University of Massachusetts-Amherst in
Amherst, MA.
Manuscript received for publication December 2007
Published by:
U.S. FOREST SERVICE
11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200
NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294
June 2008
For additional copies:
U.S. Forest Service
Publications Distribution
359 Main Road
Delaware, OH 43015-8640
Fax: (740)368-0152
Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/
CONTENTS
Executive Summary............................................................................................. 1
Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2
Findings ............................................................................................................... 7
General Ownership Patterns and Trends ........................................................ 7
Family Forest Owners ................................................................................... 10
Size of Forest Holdings ............................................................................. 10
Percent of Owner’s Land that is Forested and
Number of Parcels ................................................................................. 13
Ownership Types, Tenure, and History ...................................................... 13
Reasons for Owning Forest Land .............................................................. 15
Forest Land as Part of a Primary Home,
Secondary Home, or Farm .................................................................... 15
Leasing of Forest Land .............................................................................. 17
Participation in Cost-share, Easements, and
Sustainable Forest Certification Programs ............................................ 19
Decisionmakers ......................................................................................... 21
Timber Harvesting and Removals ............................................................. 21
Nontimber Forest Products ........................................................................ 23
Other Forest Uses ..................................................................................... 24
Forest Management Plans and Advice ...................................................... 25
Preferred Methods for Receiving Forest
Management Information ....................................................................... 27
Landowners’ Concerns .............................................................................. 28
Future Plans .............................................................................................. 29
Demographics ........................................................................................... 30
Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 32
Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. 33
Literature Cited .................................................................................................. 33
Appendix I. Data and Methods .......................................................................... 36
Index of Tables ................................................................................................. 39
Tables ............................................................................................................ 42
Page intentionally left blank
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• An estimated 11 million private forest owners (± 3 percent) collectively control 56
percent of the forest land (423 million acres ± 0.4 percent) in the United States.
• Family forest owners account for 92 percent of the private forest owners and 62
percent of the private forest land (35 percent of all forest land) in the United States.
• Sixty-one percent of family forest owners in the United States own less than 10
acres of forest land, but 53 percent of the family forest land is owned by people with
100 or more acres.
• The average (mean) land tenure for family forest owners is 26 years.
• Most family forest owners own their forest land for multiple reasons. The most
commonly cited reasons are beauty/scenery, to pass land on to heirs, privacy, nature
protection, and part of home/cabin.
• Two out of every 5 acres of family forest land are owned by absentee owners.
• Fifty-eight percent of family forest land is owned by people who have commercially
harvested trees.
• One in 5 acres of family forest land is owned by someone who has a written forest
management plan. Two in 5 acres is owned by someone who has received forest
management advice. The most common sources of this advice are state forestry
agencies and private consultants.
• Issues most commonly rated as major concerns by family forest owners are insects
and plant diseases, keeping land intact for heirs, fire, trespassing, and property taxes.
• Most family forest owners plan to do relatively little with their forest land in
the next 5 years. Of those who intend to actively do something with their land,
harvesting sawlogs or pulpwood and harvesting firewood are the most commonly
planned activities. One in 5 acres is owned by someone who plans to sell or transfer
some or all of their forest land in the next 5 years.
• Compared to the general population, there are a greater proportion of family forest
owners who are older, white, male, more educated, and wealthier. One in 5 acres of
forest land is owned by someone who is at least 75 years of age.
1
INTRODUCTION
The National Woodland Owner Survey (NWOS) is conducted by the Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program to characterize
the private forest owners of the United States. It is the social compliment to the biophysical
surveys FIA conducts. Previous national surveys of private forest owners, with varying levels
of details and comparability (see sidebar), were conducted by Birch (1996a), Birch et al.
(1982), and Josephson and McGuire (1958).
Family forest owners are the focus of this publication. Limited information for all forest
lands, private and public, is included to provide a broader context and to aid comparisons
with other studies. Family forest owners, forest land, and other pertinent terms are defined in
the “Key Definitions” sidebar. The basic relationships of the ownership categories used in this
report are summarized in Figure 1.
1
This publication summarizes the responses from 15,440 family forest owners (Table A) who
participated in the NWOS between 2002 and 2006. The over-all cooperation rate for the
NWOS is 51.3 percent. As described briefly in Appendix I: Data and Methods and in full
detail in Butler et al. (2005), the NWOS has been implemented on an annual basis since
2002; the 2002-2006 data reported here represents the first 5-year cycle of data collected
under this new system. The nominal date assigned to these data is 2006. The underlying
forest area estimates are derived from the 2007 Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA)
database compiled by FIA for the Forest Resources of the United States, 2007 report (Smith
et al., in press).
All owners
Private
Public
Nonindustrial
Industrial
Family
Federal
State
Local
Other nonindustrial
Figure 1.—Ownership categorization used in this report. Colors correspond to the categories
used in Figure 4.
1
All tables referred to in the printed portion of this report can be found beginning on page 39.
2
Assessing Trends
Although similar methods were used in the 1993 (Birch 1996a) and 2006 national forest owner
surveys, analyzing trends between the two are hampered by:
• A lack of documentation of the 1993 forest area statistics that underlie all other statistics
• The 1993 study focuses on all private forest owners; this study focuses on family forest owners
• Additions, subtractions, and changes to questions asked
• Large sampling errors associated with owners of 1 to 9 acres of forest land
• Large sampling errors associated with states with small sample sizes
The implications of these issues are:
• The base 1993 forest area numbers do not always agree with other concurrent estimates
(e.g., Powell et al. 1994). To resolve this problem would require rerunning the 1993 numbers
using either ratio estimation procedures or, ideally, calculating new inclusion probabilities.
• Either the results from the 1993 survey must be subset to include only family forest owners or
the 2006 results need to be expanded. Both approaches have benefits and shortcomings,
including data limitations, that need to be further assessed.
• Although continuity over time was important in designing the 2006 survey, conscious
decisions were made to improve it. The wording and structure of the questions must be
considered.
• Trend comparisons excluding owners with 1 to 9 acres are more precise.
• The reliability of estimates derived from small sample sizes are questionable, sampling errors
need to be assessed, and, where necessary, larger geographic areas examined.
We strongly caution anyone wishing to make direct comparisons between the 1993 and 2006
results. We are currently developing methods to overcome the shortcomings listed above and
will make trend data available as soon as possible.
Key Definitions
Forest land—Land at least 10 percent stocked by forest trees of any size, including land that
formerly had such tree cover and that will be naturally or artificially regenerated. The minimum
area for classification of forest land is 1 acre (Smith et al. 2004).
Private forest owners—Families, individuals, corporations, and other private groups that own
forest land.
Forest industry owners—Corporations and other private groups that own forest land and own
and operate primary wood-processing facilities. This group is a subset of private forest owners.
Nonindustrial private forest owners—Families and individuals who own forest land and
corporations and other private groups that own forest land, but do not own and operate a
primary wood-processing facility. This group is a subset of private forest owners.
Family forest owners—Families, individuals, trusts, estates, family partnerships, and other
unincorporated groups of individuals that own forest land. This group is a subset of nonindustrial
private forest owners.
3
Figure 2.—Areas included in the National Woodland Owner Survey between 2002 and 2006 and
delineation of multi-state analysis regions.
This report primarily focuses on national level results, but regional (Fig. 2) and state data also
are included. Within a given geographic area, the tables are arranged in the same order as the
corresponding questions in the NWOS questionnaire (Butler et al. 2005).
Except for Tables A and B, results are presented in terms of numbers of owners and area
of forest land. These two ways of looking at the data often show different, and sometimes
divergent, patterns. Both approaches are legitimate and the appropriate choice depends on one’s
objectives. For example, land managers interested in the prospective impact of policies on the
landscape would be most interested in the area estimates. Managers interested in the number,
and hence political power, of private owners impacted by policies would need to know the
number of owners potentially impacted. In addition, some will want to consider only certain
segments of family forest owners (e.g., owners with forest holdings of 10 to 999 acres). This,
too, is perfectly reasonable, but the number of permutations that people may want to examine
is nearly infinite and for simplicity’s sake, the family forest owner results presented here are
for owners with 1 or more acres of forest land. The “Size of Forest Holdings Matter” sidebars
highlight the relationships between the size of forest holdings and selected attributes.
No data were collected for interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, or western
Texas between 2002 and 2006 (Fig. 2). Nor were data colleted for Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, Guam, or any other U.S. territories or protectorates. The usual sampling frames for
these areas were lacking; it is anticipated that during the next 5-year iteration of the NWOS,
the coverage will be expanded to cover all parts of all states. During this same period, planning
for implementation in the U.S. territories and protectorates will commence. Data for interior
4
Owners vs. Area
Forest ownership statistics can be analyzed in terms of owners or
area. For example, in absolute terms:
• There are 6.2 million family forest owners (± 4 percent) with
forest holdings of 1 to 9 acres in the United States (Table US-5)
• There are 19.2 million acres of forest land (± 6 percent) that
are owned by family forest owners with forest holdings of 1 to
9 acres in the United States (Table US-5)
Equivalently, in relative terms:
• Sixty-one percent of the family forest owners in the United
States have forest holdings of 1 to 9 acres
• Eight percent of the family forest land in the United States is
owned by people with forest holdings of 1 to 9 acres
Tables in this report include summaries in terms of both owners and
area. Data users should choose the summaries that are most useful
to them—this may require examining owner, area, or owner and
area statistics.
Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas are included in Tables B to E
using data from Birch (1996c, 1996d) as described below, but are not included in any other
tables.
The NWOS population estimates, such as numbers of family forest owners in a state, are just
that – estimates. These estimates come from a systematic, random sample so the sampling
frame is unbiased, but because not all owners are included (i.e., a complete enumeration is
not conducted), sampling errors exist. Sampling errors are reported for all estimates in this
publication and the “Sampling Errors” sidebar provides a primer on how to interpret them.
Appendix I: Data and Methods contains, among other things, information on the methods used
to minimize sampling and other potential survey-related errors.
The stated precision goal of the NWOS is a sampling error of 15 percent or lower for estimates
of the number of family forest owners in a state (Butler et al. 2005). This will require minimum
sample sizes of approximately 250. This goal has yet to be achieved in all states (Fig. 3, Table A).
Sampling errors are relatively large for states with sample sizes significantly lower than the target
size. Data users are strongly encouraged to examine the sample sizes and sampling errors to
assess the precision of the estimates. If the precision level is lower than a data user desires, larger
geographic areas should be examined.
As an annual survey, the NWOS is continually collecting and compiling new data. We plan
to publish reports similar to this one every 5 years or so. An online data summary tool has
been developed to provide access to the most up-to-date information and for the generation of
customized NWOS tables. The latest NWOS results and information can be accessed at:
www.fia.fs.fed.us/nwos.
5
Sampling Errors
Sampling errors arise when not all members of a population are surveyed. Sampling errors
are included for all estimates in this report. They are reported in percentage terms and
represent the 68 percent confidence level. For example, there are an estimated 10,398
thousand family forest owners in the United States and the sampling error associated with
this estimate is 2.6 percent (Table E). This means that 68 percent of randomly selected
samples will produce estimates between 10,124 and 10,671, or 10,398 ± 274. This range is
referred to as a confidence interval. Stated another way, we are 68 percent confident
that the true population estimate is between 10,124 and 10,671. The 68 percent
confidence level is equivalent to one standard deviation and is the traditional level for
reporting sampling errors. Confidence levels can be adjusted to meet users’ needs. For
example, multiply sample errors by 2 to calculate 95 percent confidence intervals. When
examining sampling errors in this report, the following general guidance can be used:
Sampling error
Implications
< 25%
Sampling errors should be considered when interpreting
results.
25% - 49%
Sampling errors should be considered when interpreting
results and estimates should be used cautiously.
≥ 50%
Sampling errors should be considered when interpreting
results and estimates should be used very cautiously.
Appendix I: Data and Methods of this report describes how the sampling errors were
calculated.
Figure 3.—Number of family forest owners who participated in (i.e., responded to) the National
Woodland Owner Survey between 2002 and 2006.
6
United States
Local
State
1%
9%
Family
35%
Federal
33%
Other
private
21%
South
North
Local
4%
State
13%
Federal
8%
State Local
Federal 3%
1%
9%
Family
55%
Other
private
20%
Family
58%
Other
private
28%
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Local
Family
State
<1%
16%
5%
State
15%
Other
private
9%
Federal
70%
Local Family
<1% 9%
Other
private
24%
Federal
51%
Figure 4.—Area of forest land in the United States by ownership and region, 2006.
FINDINGS
General Ownership Patterns and Trends
An estimated 11 million private forest owners (± 3 percent) collectively control 56 percent of the
forest land (423 million acres ± 0.4 percent) in the United States (Fig. 4, Tables B and C). The
percentage of forest land that is privately owned varies widely across the nation (Figs. 5 and 6)
from a low of 2 percent in Nevada to a high of 95 percent in Kansas. Most of the private forest
land is located in the southern and northern United States and so, too, are most of the private
forest owners. Forty-four percent of the nation’s private forest land and 44 percent of the private
forest owners are in the South. The North has 30 percent of the nation’s private forest land and
44 percent of the private forest owners. The states with the largest areas of private forest land,
each with more than 15 million acres, are Alaska, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Maine, Texas,
North Carolina, and Arkansas (Fig. 6A). The states with the highest percentages of private
forest ownership, each with at least 90 percent, are Kansas, Texas, Maine, Alabama, Delaware,
Oklahoma, and Georgia. The states with the greatest numbers of private owners, each with more
than 500,000, are New York, Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida (Fig. 6B).
7
8
Produced by:
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
Forest Inventory and Analysis, Family Forest Research Center
Brett J. Butler (21-May-08)
Water
Nonforest land
Public forest
Private forest
Figure 5.—Private and public forest land in the United States. An electronic version of this map is available on the CD in the back of this publication.
Data sources:
Forest area - USGS National Land Cover Database 2001
Ownership - CBI Protected Areas Database, Version 4.0
State and countries - ESRI Data & Maps 2006
Forest Ownership in the Coterminous United States, 2006
A
B
Figure 6.—(A) Area of private forests, and (B) number of private forests owners in the United States, 2006.
9
Nationally, family forest owners dominate the private forest owner category in terms of acres
(Fig. 4) and numbers of owners. Ninety-two percent of the private forest owners were classified
as family forest owners (Tables C and E). Thirty-five percent of all forest land in the United
States is owned by families and individuals (Table B); in the coterminous United States, this
percentage increases to 42 percent. In the major timber-producing regions of the country,
forest industry and forest management companies, including timber investment management
organizations (TIMOs) and timber-oriented real estate investment trusts (REITs), control
most of the “other private” forest land. In other parts of the country, land conservation groups,
real estate companies, and other private corporations and groups, control much of the “other
private” forest land. The large-scale divestiture of forest industry lands over the past decade and
the related increases of TIMO and REIT holdings is a major change in private forest ownership
in the United States, but is outside the scope of this report.
Family Forest Owners
Nationally, there are 10.4 million family forest owners (± 3 percent) who own 264 million acres
of forest land (± 0.4 percent) (Table E). Due to the lack of ownership survey data being collected
in interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas noted previously (Fig.
2), national tables and the Southern, Rocky Mountain, and Pacific Coast regional tables exclude
these areas. This makes the reference population for the national tables the 10.2 million family
forest owners (± 3 percent) who own 252 million acres (± 0.4 percent) (Table US-5).
Size of Forest Holdings
80
7
70
6
Area
60
5
Owners
50
4
40
3
30
2
20
1
10
0
0
1-9
10-19
20-49
50-99
100-199 200-499 500-999
10004999
50009999
10000+
Size of forest holdings (acres)
Figure 7.—Size of family forest owners’ forest holdings in the United States, 2006. Error bars
represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
10
Owners (millions)
Area (millions of acres)
Most family forest owners in the United States own less than 10 acres of forest land, but 53
percent of the family forest land is owned by people with 100 or more acres (Fig. 7, Table US-5).
A
Proportion of Family Forest Land
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
Management plan
0.20
0.10
Management advice
Commercial harvest
0.00
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Size of forest holdings (acres)
B
Proportion of Family Forest Land
1.00
0.90
Management plan
0.80
Management advice
0.70
Commercial harvest
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
10
100
1000
10000
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Figure 8.—Relationships between size of forest holdings and timber harvesting, forest management
plans, and forest management advice for family forest owners in the United States, 2006. The x axis
in Figure 8A is an arithmetic scale and in Figure 8B it is a logarithmic scale. Error bars represent 68
percent confidence intervals.
Size of forest holdings is highly correlated with many of the behaviors and attitudes of family
forest owners (Fig. 8). Interspersed throughout this report are “Size of Forest Holdings Matter”
sidebars that highlight differences among owners by size of forest holdings.
Nationally, the average size of family forest holdings is 25 acres. This ranges from an average
of 6 acres in Rhode Island to 96 acres in Montana (Fig. 9A). Excluding owners with less than
10 acres of forest land, the average holding size increases to 58 acres with a low of 25 acres in
Delaware and a high of 406 acres in New Mexico (Fig. 9B). Average forest holdings tend to
be smaller in the North, particularly between Massachusetts and Maryland, and larger in the
Intermountain region.
11
A
B
Figure 9.—Average size of family forest holdings for owners with (A) 1 or more acres of forest land,
and (B) 10 or more acres of forest land in the Unites States, 2006.
12
Does the Size of Forest Holdings Matter?
As illustrated in Figure 8, size of forest holdings can be highly correlated with
family forest owner characteristics. In this publication, “Size of Forest Holdings
Matter” sidebars highlight selected attributes as functions of the size of forest
holdings. The five size categories and area and number of family forests in each
category are:
Size of forest
landholdings
Area
Ownerships
Acres
Sampling
error
Number
Sampling
error
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
1-9
19,158
6.4
6,220
4.4
10-49
58,585
3.1
2,831
2.2
50-99
41,562
3.2
644
2.3
100-999
97,667
2.5
508
2.1
1,000+
35,003
5.6
19
8.3
Acres
The “Size of Forest Holdings Matter” sidebars show the percentage of the owners
and forest land with various attributes. The numbers following the bars are the
actual percentages. The estimated area of forest land or number of owners
represented by each bar can be calculated by multiplying the percentage
listed by the base sizes above. Interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western
Oklahoma, and western Texas are not included in the base sizes above or any
of the “Size of Forest Holdings Matter” figures.
Percent of Owner’s Land that is Forested and Number of Parcels
2
The total land holdings of 19 percent of family forest owners, who own 19 percent of the
family forest land, is completely forested (Table US-6). Forty percent of family forest owners,
who own 52 percent of the family forest land, own land that is 50 to 99 percent forested. The
other 41 percent of family forest owners, who own 29 percent of the family forest land, own
land that is less than 50 percent forested.
Two-thirds of the family forest owners, who own 42 percent of the family forest land, have all of
their forest land in a single, contiguous parcel (Table US-7). Thirty-three percent of the owners,
who own 50 percent of the family forest land, have 2 to 9 parcels of forest land. The other 1
percent of the family forest owners, who own 8 percent of the family forest land, have 10 or
more parcels of forest land.
Ownership Types, Tenure, and History
Most (93 percent) family forest owners own some or all of their land either individually or
jointly; collectively, they own 84 percent of the family forest land (Table US-11). Other
relatively common forms of ownership are family partnerships, 6 percent of the family forest
2
All percentages exclude owners who did not answer the specific question (i.e., item nonresponse).
13
50
45
Area
Owners
40
35
Percent
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
<10
10-24
25-49
50+
Land ownership tenure (years)
Figure 10.—Land tenure of family forest owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent 68
percent confidence intervals.
owners who own 16 percent of the family forest land; and trusts and estates, 4 percent of the
family forest owners who own 9 percent of the family forest land. These percentages sum to
more than 100 because some owners own different portions of their forest land under different
legal arrangements.
Purchasing land is the most common method for forest land acquisition, but inheritance is also
relatively common (Table US-8). Eighty-two percent of the family forest owners, who own 78
percent of the family forest land, purchased some or all of their forest land. Twenty percent of
the owners, who own 36 percent of the family forest land, inherited some or all of their land.
Most received their land from a nonfamily member, but only slightly less either purchased it or
inherited it from a family member.
Most family forest owners have owned their land for relatively long periods of time (Fig. 10,
Table US-9). Forty percent of the owners, who own 53 percent of the family forest land, have
owned their land for 25 years or more. The average (mean) land tenure is 26 years.
Although most owners have owned land for relatively long periods of time, 24 percent of
the family forest owners, who own 33 percent of the family forest land, have sold, passed on,
or otherwise transferred some of it (Table US-10). Not surprisingly, owners with larger land
holdings are more likely to have transferred land (see sidebar).
14
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Land Tenure and Land Transfers
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who (A) have owned
their forest land for at least 25 years, and (B) have transferred some of their forest
land to other owners, by size of forest holdings.
75
71
1,000+
53
54
100-999
49
50
50-99
42
44
10-49
Owners
37
37
1-9
0
25
Area
50
75
100
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
B
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
A
53
52
1,000+
32
34
100-999
50-99
26
25
10-49
25
25
Owners
21
21
1-9
0
Percent
25
Area
50
75
100
Percent
Reasons for Owning Forest Land
The reasons for owning forest land vary appreciably among family forest owners but a common
trend is that most owners have multiple objectives. The NWOS asked respondents to rate
12 potential reasons for owning forest land. At least half of the family forest land is owned
by people who rated beauty/scenery, passing land on to heirs, privacy, nature protection, and
3
part of home/cabin as important or very important (Fig. 11, Table US-13). Of the financial
objectives they were asked to rate, land investment was rated as important or very important by
38 percent of the family forest owners, who own 47 percent of the family forest land. Timber
production was rated as important or very important by 10 percent of the family forest owners,
who own 32 percent of the family forest land.
Forest Land as Part of a Primary Home, Secondary Home, or Farm
Related to these ownership objectives, it is not surprising that most family forest owners, 73
percent of the family forest owners who own 59 percent of the family forest land, have their
primary residence on or near (within 1 mile) their forest land (Table US-12). Secondary
residences (e.g., vacation homes or cabins) are less common, but owners with secondary
residences associated with their land, 12 percent of the family forest owners who control 22
percent of the family forest land, still control a large amount of land: 48.8 million acres (± 3
percent).
3
Very important and important refers to values of 1 and 2, respectively, on a seven-point Likert scale with
1 defined as very important and 7 defined as not important.
15
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Ownership Objectives
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who rated (A) timber
production, and (B) enjoyment of beauty and scenery as very important or important
reasons for owning their forest land, by size of forest holdings.
A
51
53
1,000+
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
B
36
40
100-999
25
26
50-99
13
15
10-49
Owners
5
6
1-9
0
Area
25
50
75
Area
64
63
100-999
50-99
67
67
10-49
67
67
74
74
1-9
0
100
Owners
61
56
1,000+
25
50
75
100
Percent
Percent
Beauty/scenery
Pass land on to heirs
Privacy
Reason for Owning*
Nature protection
Part of home or cabin
Land investment
Hunting or fishing
Part of farm or ranch
Other recreation
Owners
Area
Timber production
Firewood production
Cultivate/collect NTFPs**
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent
* Includes owners who rated the specific objective as very important (rating = 1) or important (rating = 2) on a seven
point Likert scale with one defined as very important and seven as not important.
** Nontimber forest products
Figure 11.—Reasons for owning family forests in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent 68 percent
confidence intervals.
16
80
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Absentee Ownership
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who do not live
on or near (within one mile) their forest land, by size of forest holdings.
51
51
1,000+
43
45
100-999
38
39
50-99
32
34
10-49
Owners
22
25
1-9
0
25
Area
50
75
100
Percent
One-quarter of the family forest owners, who own 41 percent of the family forest land, reported
that their land is associated with a farm or ranch (Table US-12). This equates to 2.4 million
family forest owners (± 5 percent) and 100 million acres of forest land (±2 percent). From an
occupational perspective, 5 percent of the family forest owners, who own 10 percent of the
family forest land, reported that their primary occupation is a farmer (Table US-28). This
equates to 445 thousand family forest owners (± 23 percent) and 22 million acres of forest
land (± 7 percent). The National Agricultural Statistics Service (2004) reported that there were
818,000 farms owning a total of 76 million acres of “woodland” in 2002. These differences
deserve further investigation, but are likely related to how leased land and gentleman/
gentlewoman/hobby farms are reported, the definitions of woodland and farmland, and the
inclusion or exclusion of corporate and other nonfamily owned farms. Regardless of the specific
statistics, a significant amount of U.S. forest land is associated with farms.
Leasing of Forest Land
Five percent of the family forest owners, who own 23 percent of the family forest land, have
leased their forest land (Table US-14). Hunting and grazing are the most common lease
activities. Both the relative proportions of family forest land being leased and the purposes of
these leases vary considerably across the country (Fig. 12). In the North, where leases are least
common, recreation is the most common purpose for leasing. In the South, most leases are for
hunting. Grazing is the most common lease activity in the Rocky Mountain and Pacific Coast
regions.
17
Leased for:
Hunting
Other recreation
Grazing
Timber production
Other
United States
No
77%
Yes
23%
North
No
90%
South
Yes
10%
Rocky Mountain
No
65%
Yes
35%
Yes
30%
No
70%
Pacific Coast
No
71%
Yes
29%
* Percentages are in terms of family forest land.
Figure 12.—Leasing of forest land and relative frequency of lease activities by family forest owners in
the United States by region, 2006*.
18
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Leasing
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who have
leased their forest land, by size of forest holdings.
55
1,000+
66
23
28
100-999
11
11
50-99
6
7
10-49
Owners
3
4
1-9
0
Area
25
50
75
100
Percent
Participation in Cost-share, Easements, and Sustainable Forest Certification Programs
Most family forest owners have not participated in cost-share programs, have not participated in
a forest certification program, nor do they have an easement on their land (Fig. 13). Cost-share
programs may be sponsored by federal or state agencies or private groups. Examples of federal
programs include the Conservation Reserve Program, the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program, the Forest Land Enhancement Program, and the Forest Stewardship Program.
Six percent of the family forest owners, who own 21 percent of the family forest land, have
participated in at least one cost-share program (Table US-17).
Forest certification programs have been established to recognize and encourage sustainable
forest management. Common forest certification systems or programs include American Tree
Farm, Green Tag, Forest Stewardship Council, and Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Although 12
percent of the family forest owners, who own 24 percent of the family forest land, have heard
of sustainable forest certification, less than 1 percent of the family forest owners, who own 4
percent of the family forest land, are currently enrolled (Table US-16). Another 2 percent of the
owners, who control an additional 6 percent of the family forest land, are considering getting
their land certified.
Conservation easements are legally binding agreements that restrict land from being used for
certain designated purposes; they are voluntarily entered into by the landowner. Although the
NWOS questionnaire provided a definition of conservation easements (Butler et al. 2005),
it failed to mention the voluntary nature of the agreements and many respondents included
rights-of-way and other easements in their responses. This shortcoming will be rectified in
future iterations of the NWOS. Statistics reported here include only owners who indicated
that land use conversion is restricted, but these numbers are still high compared to other
sources (e.g., Land Trust Alliance 2006). Consequently, the easements reported here should be
interpreted as including conservation easements as well as all other easements. Easements are
on some or all of the forest land owned by 2 percent of the family forest owners, who own 4
percent of the family forest land (Table US-15).
19
Area
Yes
6%
Yes
21%
Cost-share
No
79%
No
94%
Yes
4%
Sustainable
forest
certification
No
96%
Easements
Owners
Yes
4%
No
96%
Yes
1%
No
99%
Yes
2%
No
98%
Figure 13.—Participation in cost-share programs, sustainable forest certification, and easements by
family forest owners in the United States, 2006.
20
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Cost-share, Easements, and Certification
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who have participated in (A) costshare, (B) easement, and (C) certification programs, by size of forest holdings.
B
48
45
1,000+
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
A
23
27
100-999
14
14
50-99
6
7
10-49
Owners
3
3
1-9
0
Area
25
50
75
5
7
1,000+
100-999
4
4
50-99
3
3
10-49
2
2
1-9
2
2
100
Owners
Area
0
25
Percent
50
75
100
Percent
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
C
9
1,000+
100-999
4
4
50-99
3
3
10-49
1
1
1-9
0
0
0
12
Owners
Area
25
50
75
100
Percent
Decisionmakers
Most family forest owners, 92 percent of the family forest owners who own 87 percent of the
family forest land, make the management decisions for their forest land themselves (Table US18). Other family members or a forester are the most common other decisionmakers.
Timber Harvesting and Removals
Although timber production is a primary ownership objective of a minority of the owners
(Table US-13), harvesting and removal of trees are still fairly common (Table US-19). About
46 percent of the family forest owners, who own 69 percent of the family forest land, have
harvested or removed trees from some or all of their land (Fig. 14). The number of commercial
4
harvests is lower; 27 percent of the family forest owners, who own 58 percent of the family
forest land, have commercially harvested trees. The most common reasons for harvesting are
related to the maturity, vigor, and health of the forest (Fig. 15, Table US-19).
4
Defined as harvests of sawlogs, pulpwood, and/or veneer logs.
21
Area
None
31%
Owners
Commercial
58%
None
54%
Noncommercial
11%
Commercial
27%
Noncommercial
19%
Figure 14.—Commercial and noncommercial harvesting and removal of trees by family forest
owners in the United States, 2006.
Trees were mature
Improve quality of remaining trees
Remove trees damaged by natural
catastrophes
Reason for Harvesting
Part of management plan
Wood for personal use
Needed money
Price was right
Clear land
Improve hunting
Owners
Area
Improve recreation
Other
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percent of Harvesters
Figure 15.—Reasons for harvesting or removing trees by family forest owners in the United
States, 2006. Error bars represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
22
60
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Timber Harvesting
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who have
commercially harvested trees, by size of forest holdings.
73
72
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
1,000+
65
69
100-999
54
55
50-99
36
39
10-49
Owners
16
19
1-9
0
25
Area
50
75
100
Percent
Area
No
77%
Yes
23%
Owners
No
82%
Products:
Edibles
Medicinal and dietary
supplements
Decorative, floral, or craft,
including landscaping transplants
Other including items of
cultural or religious importance
Yes
18%
Figure 16.—Collection of nontimber forest products and relative frequency of
types of products collected by family forest owners in the United States, 2006.
Nontimber Forest Products
Nontimber forest products (NTFPs), such as mushrooms, pine straw, berries, maple sap, or
landscaping transplants, have been harvested or collected on 23 percent of the family forest
land owned by 18 percent of the family forest owners (Fig. 16, Table US-20). Most of these
NTFPs were collected for personal use (as opposed to being collected for sale) and most were
categorized as either edible or decorative.
23
Private recreation
Posting land
Road/trail maintenance
Timber harvest
Activity
Tree planting
Wildlife habitat improvement
Fire hazard reduction
Site preparation
Application of chemicals
Collection of NTFPs*
Owners
Area
Public recreation
None of the above
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percent
* Nontimber forest products
* Nontimber forest products
Figure 17.—Forest activities by family forest owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent
68 percent confidence intervals.
Other Forest Uses
Other common activities that occur on family forest lands include: recreation, road/trail
maintenance, and tree planting (Fig. 17, Table US-22). Recreation is primarily by the
landowner, their family, and friends and many landowners post their land to discourage others
from accessing it. Seven percent of the family forest owners, who own 15 percent of the family
forest land, allow the general public to recreate on their land.
24
Area
Owners
Maybe
1%
Maybe
2%
Plans
Yes
4%
Yes
17%
No
95%
No
81%
Advice
Yes
37%
No
63%
Yes
15%
No
85%
Figure 18.—Management plans and advice received by family forest owners in the United States, 2006.
Forest Management Plans and Advice
Four percent of the family owners, who own 17 percent of the family forest land, report
having a written forest management plan (Fig. 18, Table US-21). When asked if they received
advice about their forest land, these percentages increase substantially, but still well below half
answered affirmatively; 14 percent of the family forest owners, who own 37 percent of the
family forest land, received advice about their forest land (Table US-23). The most common
sources of advice are state forestry agencies and private consultants (Fig. 19).
25
State forestry agency
Private consultant
Source of Advice
Federal agency
Logger
Another landowner
Extension
Owners
Area
Forest industry
Other state agency
Other
0
5
10
15
20
25
Percent
Figure 19.—Sources of forest management advice for family forest owners in the United States, 2006.
Error bars represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
Size of Forest Holdings Matter: Management Plans and Advice
Percentage of family forest land and family forest owners who have (A) written forest
management plans, and (B) received forest management advice, by size of forest holdings.
B
39
41
1,000+
18
21
100-999
11
12
50-99
5
5
10-49
Owners
1
1
1-9
0
Area
25
50
Percent
26
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
Size of Forest Holdings (acres)
A
75
100
62
1,000+
69
41
45
100-999
28
29
50-99
18
20
10-49
Owners
9
10
1-9
0
Area
25
50
Percent
75
100
Preferred Method to Receive Forest Management Information*
Talking with a forester
Books/pamphlets
Newsletters/magazines
Talking with other
owners
Videos
Visiting others'
woodlands
Internet
Television/radio
Conferences and
workshops
Owners
Area
Talking with a logger
Organization
membership
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Percent
* Includes owners who rated the specific method as very useful (rating = 1) or useful (rating = 2) on a seven
* Includes owners who rated the specific method as very useful (rating = 1) or useful
point Likert scale with 1 defined as very useful and 7 as not useful.
Figure 20.—Preferred methods to receive information about forest management for family forest
owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
Preferred Methods for Receiving Forest Management Information
Talking with a forester, publications, and newsletters were rated as useful or very useful5
methods for obtaining forest management information by at least one-third of the owners, who
own at least one-third of the family forest land (Fig. 20, Table US-24). The next tier of preferred
methods to receive information includes talking with other owners, videos, visiting other
owners’ forests, and the Internet. It is clear that there is no single preference for all owners and
many owners are interested in multiple methods.
5
Includes owners who rated the specific methods as very useful (rating = 1) or useful (rating = 2) on a
seven point Likert scale with 1 defined as very useful and 7 as not useful.
27
Insects or plant diseases
Keeping land intact for heirs
Fire
Trespassing or poaching
High property taxes
Landowner Concerns*
Misuse of forest land**
Wind or ice storms
Air or water pollution
Undesirable plants
Development of nearby land
Harvesting regulations
Lawsuits
Timber theft
Dealing with endangered species
Motorized vehicles***
Owners
Area
Lack of new trees
Wild animals
Domestic animals
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percent
Includes
rated
theasspecific
issue as
a great
=1
* Includes*owners
whoowners
rated thewho
specifi
c issue
a great concern
(rating
= 1 concern
or 2) on a(rating
seven point
Likert scale
1 defi
ned as point
great concern
7 as
no concern.
orwith
2) on
a seven
Likert and
scale
with
1 defined as great concern and 7
** Includes vandalism
and illegal dumping.
as no concern.
*** Includes
and
noise from and
unauthorized
motorized vehicles.
** damage
Includes
vandalism
illegal dumping.
*** Includes damage and noise from unauthorized motorized vehicles.
Figure 21.—Concerns of family forest owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent 68
percent confidence intervals.
Landowners’ Concerns
Many family forest owners are concerned that external forces will adversely affect their forests
and their ability to use their forests as they desire. The most commonly rated major concerns6
are keeping land intact for their heirs, insects and plant diseases, fire, trespassing, and property
taxes (Fig. 21, Tables US-25 and US-26). Other relatively common concerns are misuse of the
6
Includes owners who rated the specific issue as a great concern (rating = 1 or 2) on a seven point Likert
scale with 1 defined as great concern and 7 as no concern.
28
Minimal activity
Leave it as is - no activity
Harvest firewood
Harvest sawlogs or pulpwood
Transfer to heirs
Future Plans
No current plans
Buy more forest land
Collect nontimber forest products
Sell forest land
Convert forest to non-forest land
Convert non-forest to forest land
Owners
Subdivide and sell forest land
Area
Other
Unknown
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percent
Figure 22.—Future (next 5 years) plans of family forest owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars
represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
land (e.g., illegal dumping), damage from storms, air and water pollution, undesirable plants,
development of nearby lands, harvesting regulations, and lawsuits.
Future Plans
Most family forest owners plan few activities for their forest land in the next 5 years (Fig. 22,
Table US-27). Of those who do intend to actively do something with their land, harvesting
sawlogs or pulpwood and harvesting firewood are the most commonly planned activities. There
is also a sizable amount of land that is owned by people who plan to sell or transfer some or all
of their forest land in the next 5 years (55 million acres ± 3 percent; 14 percent of the family
7
forest owners who own 23 percent of the family forest land ).
7
These numbers are slightly lower than those computed by simply combining the “sell” and “transfer”
categories because the categories are not exclusive —some owners plan to do both.
29
40
Area
35
Owners
30
Percent
25
20
15
10
5
0
<35
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
Owner Age (years)
Figure 23.—Age of family forest owners in the United States, 2006. Error bars represent 68 percent
confidence intervals.
Demographics
Demographic information was collected for the self-proclaimed, primary decisionmaker for
the forest land. In many circumstances, the forest land is jointly owned, but the primary
decisionmaker was asked to complete the questionnaire. This information is utilized to help
design effective communication tools, to help ensure public forestry programs comply with
anti-discrimination policies, and other uses.
Forty-nine percent of the family forest owners, who own 52 percent of the family forest land,
are retirees (Table US-28). Of those who are still working, the most common occupation
categories are professionals (e.g., engineers and accountants), officials and managers (e.g., CEOs
and administrators), and craft workers (e.g., carpenters and mechanics). An additional 5 percent
of the owners, who own 9 percent of the family forest land, reported their occupation as a
farmer. Classification of the owners’ occupations is based on the U.S. Office of Management
and Budget’s Standard Occupational Classification Manual (2000) using the U.S. Census
Bureau’s collapsing rules (U.S. Census Bureau 2000).
The high percentage of retirees is correlated with the advanced age of many of the family forest
owners. Fifteen percent of the owners, who own 20 percent of the family forest land, are 75
years or older (Fig. 23, Table US-29). An additional 19 percent of the owners, who own an
additional 24 percent of the family forest land, are between the ages of 65 and 74. Looking at
people in the general population who are 25 years or older, 10 percent of them are between 65
and 74 years of age and 9 percent are 75 years or older (Fig. 24A)
Compared to the general public (U.S. Census Bureau 2001a, 2001b), family forest owners’
education and income levels are relatively high (Fig. 24B and 24C). Thirty-one percent of
30
A
40
General population*
35
Family forest owners
Percent
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
Age (years)
B
40
General population*
35
Family forest owners
Percent
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
12th grade High school
or lower
or
equivalent
Some
college
Associate's
degree
Bachelor's
degree
Graduate
degree
Highest Level of Education Attained
C
Percent
40
35
General population
30
Family forest owners
25
20
15
10
5
0
Less than
$25,000
$25,000 $49,999
$50,000 $99,999
$100,000 $199,000
$200,000 or
more
Annual Household Income
* The general population statistics include only people 25 years or older.
Data source for general population statistics: U.S. Census Bureau 2001a and 2001b.
Figure 24.—Comparison of (A) age, (B) education, and (C) annual household
income between family forest owners and the general population. Error bars
represent 68 percent confidence intervals.
the owners, who own 41 percent of the family forest land, have at least a bachelor’s degree
8
compared to 24 percent of the general population (Table US-30). Eighteen percent of the
family owners, who own 27 percent of the family forest land, have annual household incomes of
at least $100,000 compared to 12 percent of the general population (Table US-31).
8
Including only owners who are 25 years or older.
31
Demographically, family forest owners are relatively homogeneous. Most of the primary
decisionmakers are white males (Tables US-32 and US-33); 72 percent of the family forest
owners, who own 78 percent of the family forest land, are male and 95 percent of the family
forest owners, who own 96 percent of the family forest land, are white. About 16 percent of the
owners, who own 17 percent of the family forest land, have a physical disability (Table US-34).
Seven percent of the family forest owners, who own 8 percent of the family forest land, have a
vision or hearing impediment.
CONCLUSIONS
America’s family forest owners are diverse, dynamic, and numerous. There are 10.4 million of
them (± 3 percent) who collectively own 264 million acres of forest land (± 0.4 percent) or 35
percent of the forests in the United States. Collectively, they own a plurality of the forest land
and are thus pivotal to achieving broad-scale, sustainable forest management goals. Numerous
surveys and other research initiatives have focused on family forest owners (see review in
Hodgdon and Tyrrell 2003), but the NWOS is the only national-level survey of family forest
owners that is scientifically based and has been completed for multiple iterations (i.e., 1993 and
2006).
As shown in Figure 8 and the “Size of Forest Holdings Matter” sidebars, the size of forest
holdings is an important determinant, or at least correlate, with many of the attributes of
family forest owners. It is positively correlated with having a written forest management plan,
having received forest management advice, and conducting commercial timber harvests. If the
size of forest holdings continue to decrease, as many experts expect it to do (e.g., Sampson and
DeCoster 2000, Best and Wayburn 2001), the overall attitudes and behaviors of family forest
owners will continue to change.
Most family forest owners are interested in the amenities, such as beauty, scenery, and privacy,
that their forests provide. Given the predicted decrease in size of forest holdings and other
societal factors (e.g., increasing incomes) these amenities are likely to increase in importance.
This has important implications for how the land is viewed by the owners and subsequently
managed. Timber production is not a primary objective of most family forest owners,
but timber harvesting is a common activity. How can forestry professionals bring forest
management to the forefront of family forest owners’ minds and help ensure that owners are
meeting their needs and sound forest management is being conducted? A better understanding
of owners’ needs and concerns is a first step. The next step is to turn this knowledge into
actionable plans (e.g., Butler et al. 2007).
Family forest ownership patterns will continue to change as land passes from one generation to
the next, within families or otherwise. Twenty-three percent of the family forest land is owned
by people who intend to sell or transfer their land soon. This is related to the fact that 20
percent of the family forest land is owned by people who are 75 years or older. The magnitude
of changes in the attitudes and behaviors between the current and future owners will be a
function of, among other things, the background, objectives, and circumstances of the new
owners and the characteristics of their land. For example, will the new owners be more or less
likely to have rural backgrounds, will they be more or less likely to be absentee owners, will they
32
own smaller or larger parcels of forest land, will they be more or less interested in earning money
from their land and if they are, from what sources, timber or land sales? These and many other
unanswered questions will shape the future of America’s family forest owners and America’s
forest lands.
The NWOS findings have important implications for organizations that rely on, provide
services to, or otherwise interact with family forest owners. Increased understanding of family
forest owners will lead to better forest policies, more effective outreach campaigns, services and
programs better suited to meet owners’ needs, and a heightened awareness of the importance of
family forest owners. Through continued implementation of the NWOS and related research,
we hope to monitor trends and further refine our understanding of America’s family forest
owners.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank the thousands of forest owners who graciously participated in this survey.
Without the hard work and foresight of my predecessor, Tom Birch, and former colleague,
Earl Leatherberry, the NWOS would not be what it is today. Mark Brown and John Winborne
provided critical assistance in data preparation and processing. My fellow FIA employees, from
the field crews who collected the names and addresses, to the people in the office who compiled
the lists and numbers, are the unsung backbone of the NWOS. The generous support of the
U.S. Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Cooperative Forestry program has been essential
to the success of the NWOS. The guidance and support of the NWOS steering committee and
the community of people interested in private forest ownership issues have greatly improved
the NWOS. I am very grateful for the review comments provided by Mark Brown, Mark
Buccowich, Sally Campbell, Karl Dalla Rosa, Bill Hubbard, and others.
LITERATURE CITED
Azuma, D.L.; Hiserote, B.A.; Dunham, P.A. 2005. The western juniper resource of eastern
Oregon, 1999. Resour. Bull. PNW-249. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 18 p.
Bechtold, W.A.; Patterson, P.L. 2005. The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis program—
national sampling design and estimation procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80. Asheville,
NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 85 p.
Best, C.; Wayburn, L.A. 2001. America’s private forests: status and stewardship. Washington,
DC: Island Press. 268 p.
Birch, T.W. 1996a. Private forest-land owners of the United States, 1994. Resour. Bull.
NE-134. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest
Experiment Station. 183 p.
Birch, T.W. 1996b. Private forest-land owners of the Northern United States, 1994. Resour.
Bull. NE-136. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern
Forest Experiment Station. 293 p.
33
Birch, T.W. 1996c. Private forest-land owners of the Southern United States, 1994. Resour.
Bull. NE-138. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern
Forest Experiment Station. 195 p.
Birch, T.W. 1996d. Private forest-land owners of the Western United States, 1994. Resour.
Bull. NE-137. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern
Forest Experiment Station. 249 p.
Birch, T.W.; Lewis, D.G.; Kaiser, H.F. 1982. The private forest-land owners of the United
States. Resour. Bull. WO-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service. 64 p.
Butler, B.J.; Leatherberry, E.C.; Williams, M.S. 2005. Design, implementation, and analysis
methods for the National Woodland Owner Survey. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-336. Newtown
Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
43 p.
Butler, B.J.; Tyrrell, M.; Feinberg, G.; et al. 2007. Understanding and reaching family forest
owners: lessons from social marketing research. Journal of Forestry. 105(7): 348-357.
Campbell, S.; van Hees, W.W.S.; Mead, B. 2004. Southeast Alaska forests: inventory
highlights. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-609. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p.
Campbell, S.; van Hees, W.W.S.; Mead, B. 2005. South-central Alaska forests: inventory
highlights. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-652. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 28 p.
Crocker, S.J.; Moser, W.K.; Brand, G.J.; et al. 2006. Iowa’s forest resources in 2004. Resour.
Bull. NC-263. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central
Research Station. 34 p.
Dillman, D.A. 2001. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York:
Wiley. 464 p.
Hodgdon, B.; Tyrrell, M. 2003. Literature review: an annotated bibliography on family
forest owners. GISF Research Paper 002. New Haven, CT: Yale University, School of
Forestry and Environmental Studies, Global Institute of Sustainable Forestry. 17 p.
Josephson, H.R.; McGuire, J.R. 1958. Ownership of forest land and timber. In: Timber
resources for America’s future. For. Res. Rep. No. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 289-321.
Land Trust Alliance. 2006. 2005 National land trust census report. Washington, DC. 22 p.
http://www.lta.org/census/. (accessed 30 November 2007).
34
Powell, D.S.; Faulkner, J.L.; Darr, D.R.; Zhu, Z.; MacCleery, D.W. 1993. Forest resources of
the United States, 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-234. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 132 p.
Sampson, R.N.; DeCoster, L. 2000. Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable
private forests. Journal of Forestry. 98(3): 4-8.
Smith, W.B.; Miles, P.D.; Hoppus, M.; et al. In press. Forest resources of the United States,
2007. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Smith, W.B.; Miles, P.D.; Vissage, J.S.; et al. 2004. Forest resources of the United States,
2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, North Central Research Station. 137 p.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Census 2000 special EEO tabulation: occupational crosswalk to
EEO occupational groups and EEO-1 job categories. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Commerce, Census Bureau. 16 p. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/eeoindex/jobgroups.
pdf. (accessed 9 July 2007).
U.S. Census Bureau. 2001a. Census 2000 summary file 1 for the United States. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/main/www/
cen2000.html. (accessed 7 November 2007).
U.S. Census Bureau. 2001b. Census 2000 summary file 3 for the United States. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/main/www/
cen2000.html. (accessed 7 November 2007).
U.S. Office of Management and Budget, National Technical Information Service. 2000.
Standard occupational classification manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, National Technical Information Service. 257 p.
USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis. 2005. Forest Inventory and Analysis:
National core field guide. Volume I: field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots.
Version 3.0. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 203 p. http://
www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/field-guides-methods-proc/docs/2006/core_ver_3-0_10_2005.pdf.
(accessed 10 July 2007).
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. 2002 Census of Agriculture, United
States summary and State data, Volume 1. AC-02-A-51. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 657 p. http://www.nass.
usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/USVolume104.pdf. (accessed 30 November 2007).
35
APPENDIX I: DATA AND METHODS
Full details of the design, implementation, estimation, and analysis of the NWOS are available
in Butler et al. (2005), which is included on the CD in the back of this publication. Presented
here is a synopsis of that publication and descriptions of how special circumstances were handled.
The NWOS is conducted by the U.S. Forest Service, FIA program to increase our
understanding of:
• Who owns the forests of the United States
• Why they own them
• How they use them
• What they intend to do with them
On an annual basis, the NWOS uses an area-based sampling frame to contact approximately
6,000 private forest owners from across the United States. First, a grid is established with the
cell size commensurate with the sampling intensity for the given state. Within each cell, a
point is randomly selected. Remote sensing and site visits are used to determine which points
are forested. The owner of record is collected from public tax records for all forested plots. The
methods prescribed by Dillman (2001) are used to contact the private owners and persuade
them to complete the self-administered mail questionnaires. Between 2002 and 2006, 15,440
family forest owners participated in the NWOS (Table A). The overall cooperation rate was
51.3 percent.
Forest land refers to land at least 1 acre in size and “at least 10 percent stocked by forest trees of
any size, including land that formerly had such tree cover and that will be naturally or artificially
regenerated” (Smith et al. 2004). Family forests are defined as forest land owned by families,
individuals, trusts, estates, family partnerships, and unincorporated groups of individuals. This
category is synonymous with the “individual” owner class used by the FIA forest inventory
(USDA For. Serv. 2005) and the 1993 NWOS (Birch 1996a). Nonindustrial private forests
(NIPF) are forests owned by private families, individuals, corporations, or other groups that
neither own nor operate a primary wood processing facility; family forests are a subset of
nonindustrial private forests. This is synonymous with the NIPF definition used by the FIA
forest inventory and Forest Resources of the United States, 2002 (Smith et al. 2004).
Forest land area by ownership group and associated variances were derived from the database
assembled for the Renewable Resources Planning Act Assessment report (i.e., Smith et al., in
press). These data come from the most recently completed state-level FIA forest surveys. Areas
were calculated by summing the area expansion factors that were calculated using the methods
described in Bechtold and Patterson (2005). Variances were calculated using (nonstratified)
simple random sampling algorithms adapted from Bechtold and Patterson (2005). To
avoid pseudo-replication, only plot center (condition number one) was used in the variance
calculations.
Estimates were made for each of the estimation units depicted in Figure 25. These sampling
units are a superset of the FIA forest survey units (USDA For. Serv. 2005). In general, forest
survey unit numbers do not match the NWOS estimation unit numbers. A minimum of
36
Figure 25.—Estimation units used to calculate National Woodland Owner Survey results. Estimation
units do not cross state boundaries.
25 responses from family forest owners were required for each sampling unit. When this
requirement was not met, adjacent survey units within a state were collapsed. State-level
estimates were made by summing the sub-state level estimates.
Area and owner estimates were made separately. Area estimates were made using simple random
sample estimators (Butler et al. 2005). To adjust for unequal inclusion probabilities, probability
proportional to size estimators were used to calculate owner estimates (Butler et al. 2005). The
unequal inclusion probabilities arise because we use an area-based sampling frame and therefore
owners with larger parcels have a higher probability of being included than owners with smaller
parcels.
Differences between sample estimates and true population values can arise due to sampling
error, coverage error, measurement error, and nonresponse error (Dillman 2001). Since we used
a random sample design, coverage errors are not an issue. Measurement errors are the result of
poor questions. To assure good wording, the survey instrument was pretested and a national
committee of experts reviewed it.
Tests were performed to identify potential nonresponse errors. Size of forest holdings is an
important variable and is integral for making estimates of number of owners (see Statistical
Estimation Procedures in Butler et al. 2005). Hence, this variable was the principal variable
used to test for nonresponse bias. Tests were conducted using ancillary data (e.g., size of parcels
37
from tax records) and by segregating data by various spatial units (to test for differences along
the urban-rural continuum). No statistically significant biases were detected.
Sampling errors are the result of not all members of a population being included in a survey. As
the number of participants approaches the number in the population, the sampling error will
approach zero. Sampling errors are reported for estimates in percentage terms. Sampling errors
should always be considered when looking at specific estimates. Estimates with sampling errors
greater than or equal to 50 percent should be used very cautiously. All estimates with sampling
errors greater than or equal to 25 percent should be used with caution. Estimates can be
improved (i.e., sampling errors reduced) by increasing the sampling intensity and/or increasing
the response rate.
No NWOS data were collected for interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, or
western Texas between 2002 and 2006. In the national summary tables (i.e., Tables B to E),
forest area statistics were taken from the 2007 RPA data (Smith et al., in press) and ownership
data were taken from the 1993 ownership survey (Birch 1996c, 1996d). As noted in the
footnotes of the tables, interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas
are excluded from all other tables. The coastal area of Alaska that is included here is defined
as the southeast and south-central portions of Alaska as defined in Campbell et al. (2004) and
Campbell et al. (2005) and depicted in Figure 2.
38
INDEX OF TABLES
Table A.—Numbers of responses and cooperation rates for family forest owners who
participated in the U.S. Forest Services’ National Woodland Owner Survey between 2002 and
2006 by region, subregion, and state
Table B.—Area of forest land in the United States by ownership category, region, subregion,
and state, 2006
Table C.—Area and number of private forests in the United States by region, subregion, and
state, 2006
Table D.—Area and number of nonindustrial private forests in the United States by region,
subregion, and state, 2006
Table E.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by region, subregion, and
state, 2006
National, Regional, and State Tables
The NWOS results are summarized in separate sets of tables for the United States, regions, and
states (Fig. 2). These tables are based on data collected between 2002 and 2006. The U.S. tables
are included in the printed portion of this report (labeled A through E and US-1 through -34)
and all of the tables are included on the accompanying CD. The tables are numbered the same
with identifiers prior to the numbers used to identify the specific table set. The identifiers are
US for the national tables, NORTH, SOUTH, ROCKY, or PACIFIC for the regional tables,
and the two-letter state abbreviations for the state tables. The tables are:
Table US-1.—Number of responses and cooperation rate for family forest owners who
participated in the U.S. Forest Services’ National Woodland Owner Survey between 2002 and
2006 in the United States.
Table US-2.—Area of forest land in the United States by ownership category, 2006
Table US-3.—Area and number of private forests in the United States by size of forest
landholdings, 2006
Table US-4.—Area and number of nonindustrial private forests in the United States by size of
forest landholdings, 2006
Table US-5.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by size of forest
landholdings, 2006
Table US-6.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by percent of owner’s land
that is forested, 2006
Table US-7.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by number of forested
parcels, 2006
39
Table US-8.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by type and source of
forest land acquisition, 2006
Table US-9.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by ownership tenure,
2006
Table US-10.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by frequency and
recipient of forest land transfers, 2006
Table US-11.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by form of ownership,
2006
Table US-12.—Area and number of family forests in the United States that are associated with
owners’ farms, primary homes, and vacation homes, 2006
Table US-13.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by reason for owning
forest land, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each objective as very important
(1) or important (2) on a seven-point Likert scale.
Table US-14.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by lease status, 2006
Table US-15.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by status of easements
that restrict land use conversions, 2006
Table US-16.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by knowledge of and
participation in sustainable forest certification programs, 2006
Table US-17.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by participation in costshare programs, 2006
Table US-18.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by primary forest
management decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-19.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by timber harvesting
activities and reasons, 2006
Table US-20.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by activities related to
nontimber forest products (NTFPs), 2006
Table US-21.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by management plan
status, 2006
Table US-22.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by recent (past 5 years)
forestry activity, 2006
40
Table US-23.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by advice received and
advice source, 2006
Table US-24.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by preferred methods to
receive forest management information, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each
method as very useful (1) or useful (2) on a seven-point Likert scale.
Table US-25.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by landowners’
sociopolitical concerns, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each issue as a very
important (1) or important (2) concern on a seven-point Likert scale.
Table US-26.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by landowners’ forest
health concerns, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each issue as a very important
(1) or important (2) concern on a seven-point Likert scale.
Table US-27.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by landowners’ future
(next 5 years) plans for their forest land, 2006
Table US-28.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by primary occupation
of the primary decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-29.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by age of the primary
decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-30.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by highest level of
formal education of the primary decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-31.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by primary
decisionmaker’s annual household income, 2006
Table US-32.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by gender of the primary
decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-33.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by ethnicity and race of
the primary decisionmaker, 2006
Table US-34.—Area and number of family forests in the United States by disability of the
primary decisionmaker, 2006
41
Table A.--Numbers of responses and cooperation rates for family forest owners who participated in the
U.S. Forest Services' National Woodland Owner Survey between 2002 and 2006 by region, subregion,
and state
Region, subregion,
Surveys
Number of
Number of
Cooperation
and state
sent
undeliverables
responses
rate
Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
157
22
77
57.0
78
30
19
39.6
Maine
911
122
419
53.1
Maryland
210
36
78
44.8
Massachusetts
203
29
82
47.1
New Hampshire
254
52
119
58.9
Delaware
New Jersey
107
24
35
42.2
New York
1,313
261
424
40.3
Pennsylvania
2,878
169
1,205
44.5
Rhode Island
74
8
33
50.0
317
73
147
60.2
650
107
245
45.1
7,152
933
2,883
46.4
Vermont
West Virginia
Northeast total:
North Central:
Illinois
641
51
327
55.4
Indiana
533
57
270
56.7
Iowa
392
46
206
59.5
Michigan
3,683
414
2,028
62.0
Minnesota
1,421
268
743
64.4
Missouri
2,188
285
1,115
58.6
Ohio
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
495
74
225
53.4
2,612
390
1,483
66.7
11,965
1,585
6,397
61.6
19,117
2,518
9,280
55.9
South:
Southeast:
Florida
Georgia
266
40
108
47.8
1,714
261
723
49.8
North Carolina
791
59
321
43.9
South Carolina
1,787
211
694
44.0
Virginia
Southeast total:
987
76
444
48.7
5,545
647
2,290
46.8
South Central:
Alabama
1,848
257
834
52.4
Arkansas
817
161
281
42.8
Kentucky
952
98
375
43.9
Louisiana
372
60
121
38.8
Mississippi
921
341
198
34.1
Oklahoma (east)
Tennessee
Texas (east)
South Central total:
South total:
42
263
79
65
35.3
1,585
206
519
37.6
923
66
386
45.0
7,681
1,268
2,779
43.3
13,226
1,915
5,069
44.8
Table A. (continued)
Region, subregion,
and state
Surveys
sent
Number of
undeliverables
Number of
responses
Cooperation
rate
Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
366
46
172
53.8
Nebraska
190
23
85
50.9
North Dakota
117
14
41
39.8
South Dakota
Great Plains total:
79
11
33
48.5
752
94
331
50.3
42.2
Intermountain:
Arizona
90
26
27
212
95
65
55.6
94
58
18
50.0
193
82
49
44.1
1
0
0
0.0
94
45
20
40.8
146
28
64
54.2
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
115
945
25
359
42
285
46.7
48.6
Rocky Mountain total:
1,697
453
616
49.5
45
6
20
51.3
45
6
20
51.3
272
27
136
55.5
Colorado
Idaho
Montana
Nevada
New Mexico
Utah
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska (coastal):
Alaska total:
Pacific Northwest:
Oregon
Washington
Pacific Northwest total:
268
33
130
55.3
540
60
266
55.4
496
77
189
45.1
0
496
77
189
45.1
Pacific Coast total:
1,081
143
475
50.6
United States total:
35,121
5,029
15,440
51.3
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
43
Table B.--Area of forest land in the United States by ownership category, region, subregion, and state, 2006
Private
Region, subregion,
and state
All ownerships
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Total
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Family
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Other Private
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
Delaware
Maine
1,794
6.6
1,383
7.4
898
8.7
485
13.5
383
11.2
351
11.6
244
13.7
107
22.0
17,673
1.3
16,575
1.3
5,727
2.2
10,848
1.7
Maryland
2,566
4.2
1,957
4.8
1,462
5.4
495
10.1
Massachusetts
3,171
4.9
2,179
5.8
1,686
6.2
493
13.8
New Hampshire
4,850
3.4
3,646
3.8
2,358
4.3
1,288
7.3
New Jersey
2,132
4.6
1,322
5.7
805
7.3
517
9.3
New York
18,669
1.7
14,438
1.9
11,252
2.0
3,186
4.7
Pennsylvania
16,577
1.4
11,738
1.7
8,906
1.8
2,832
3.8
Rhode Island
356
10.1
303
10.8
204
12.5
99
20.7
4,618
2.6
3,864
2.7
3,109
2.8
755
7.8
12,007
1.5
10,418
1.6
7,174
1.8
3,244
3.1
84,796
0.7
68,175
0.7
43,825
0.9
24,349
1.3
Illinois
4,525
3.3
3,730
3.6
3,465
3.7
265
14.2
Indiana
4,656
3.0
3,888
3.2
3,471
3.4
417
10.8
Iowa
2,879
4.2
2,552
4.5
2,449
4.5
102
23.1
Michigan
19,545
1.0
12,117
1.2
8,956
1.4
3,161
2.5
Minnesota
16,391
1.1
7,114
1.8
5,390
2.0
1,724
3.7
Missouri
15,078
1.5
12,393
1.6
11,605
1.6
788
7.2
Vermont
West Virginia
Northeast total:
North Central:
Ohio
7,894
2.5
6,973
2.6
5,796
2.7
1,177
7.1
16,275
1.0
11,117
1.2
9,083
1.3
2,034
3.2
87,243
0.6
59,885
0.7
50,215
0.8
9,670
1.7
172,039
0.4
128,060
0.5
94,041
0.6
34,019
1.1
Florida
16,147
2.1
11,427
2.4
4,900
3.7
6,527
3.3
Georgia
24,784
1.1
22,440
1.1
14,338
1.3
8,102
2.0
North Carolina
18,447
1.7
15,497
1.9
11,194
2.1
4,303
4.0
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
South:
Southeast:
South Carolina
12,746
1.8
11,189
1.8
7,320
2.1
3,869
3.5
15,766
1.1
13,000
1.2
9,992
1.3
3,008
2.9
87,889
0.7
73,553
0.7
47,744
0.8
25,809
1.4
Alabama
22,693
1.1
21,264
1.1
14,792
1.3
6,471
2.4
Arkansas
18,830
1.3
15,156
1.4
9,390
1.8
5,767
2.4
Virginia
Southeast total:
South Central:
Kentucky
11,970
1.5
10,647
1.6
9,103
1.7
1,543
4.8
Louisiana
14,222
1.7
12,512
1.8
5,815
2.5
6,697
2.5
Mississippi
19,622
1.3
17,320
1.3
12,146
1.4
5,174
2.8
Oklahoma
7,665
5.5
7,000
6.0
5,716
7.1
1,283
8.2
Tennessee
14,480
1.5
12,310
1.6
9,975
1.7
2,335
4.2
17,273
1.2
16,204
1.2
10,841
1.1
5,363
2.7
126,756
0.6
112,412
0.6
77,779
0.8
34,633
1.1
214,644
0.4
185,965
0.5
125,522
0.6
60,443
0.9
Texas
South Central total:
South total:
44
Table B. (continued)
Public
Region, subregion,
and state
Total
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Federal
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
State
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Local
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
Delaware
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
New Jersey
411
14.7
-
-
257
18.5
154
24.3
32
40.5
-
-
32
40.5
-
1,098
6.3
164
16.8
776
7.5
158
16.3
-
609
8.7
72
26.5
424
10.3
113
20.8
992
9.5
106
30.3
603
12.0
283
18.2
1,204
7.3
773
8.9
265
16.3
166
20.7
810
7.6
106
21.5
531
9.2
173
16.7
New York
4,231
3.8
142
22.8
3,630
4.0
459
12.6
Pennsylvania
4,839
2.8
603
8.4
3,812
3.1
424
10.1
Rhode Island
53
28.7
-
42
31.8
10
66.0
Vermont
-
754
7.8
369
10.9
313
12.2
72
26.2
West Virginia
1,589
5.0
1,233
5.6
278
12.4
77
23.5
Northeast total:
16,621
1.8
3,568
3.7
10,964
2.1
2,088
5.5
Illinois
795
7.9
368
11.1
204
16.0
223
15.6
Indiana
767
7.8
403
10.6
334
11.9
31
40.2
Iowa
327
13.0
104
22.9
163
18.4
60
30.3
Michigan
7,427
1.6
2,958
2.5
4,118
2.1
351
8.1
Minnesota
9,277
1.5
2,789
2.7
4,400
2.1
2,089
3.2
Missouri
2,686
3.7
1,838
4.4
784
7.1
63
25.9
16.8
North Central:
Ohio
921
8.1
276
14.5
423
11.8
222
5,157
1.9
1,576
3.5
1,075
4.4
2,506
2.7
27,357
0.9
10,312
1.6
11,501
1.4
5,545
2.1
43,978
0.9
13,880
1.5
22,465
1.3
7,633
2.1
Florida
4,720
4.1
2,068
6.0
2,221
6.0
431
14.3
Georgia
2,343
3.9
1,758
4.4
356
10.2
230
12.7
North Carolina
2,950
4.8
2,090
5.6
601
10.9
258
16.7
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
South:
Southeast:
South Carolina
1,557
5.6
1,071
6.8
325
12.6
160
17.7
Virginia
2,766
3.0
2,250
3.2
302
9.5
213
11.4
14,336
2.0
9,237
2.3
3,806
4.2
1,293
6.9
Alabama
1,429
5.4
986
6.5
330
11.4
113
19.6
Arkansas
3,674
3.2
3,155
3.3
448
10.2
71
25.3
Kentucky
1,324
5.3
1,059
5.9
212
13.9
53
28.4
Southeast total:
South Central:
Louisiana
1,709
5.3
975
6.8
538
9.8
197
16.1
Mississippi
2,303
4.2
1,834
4.6
236
13.3
233
13.6
Oklahoma
665
11.6
499
13.4
139
25.8
27
59.0
Tennessee
2,171
4.3
1,473
5.2
599
8.5
99
21.3
Texas
1,069
5.6
905
6.2
109
16.1
54
21.9
14,344
1.7
10,886
1.9
2,611
4.3
847
7.4
28,679
1.3
20,124
1.5
6,417
3.0
2,139
5.1
South Central total:
South total:
45
Table B. (continued)
Private
Region, subregion,
and state
All ownerships
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Total
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Family
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Other Private
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
2,106
5.0
1,994
5.1
1,906
Nebraska
1,245
6.8
724
9.0
1,092
7.2
510
10.7
1,682
5.9
492
5,757
3.1
Arizona
18,671
Colorado
22,612
Idaho
21,430
North Dakota
South Dakota
Great Plains total:
5.2
88
25.2
1,054
7.4
38
39.3
424
11.7
86
26.1
10.9
352
12.9
140
20.5
4,088
3.7
3,736
3.8
352
12.8
2.2
7,381
3.5
1,371
8.4
6,010
3.9
2.1
5,360
5.0
4,193
5.6
1,168
10.9
3.1
2,553
10.2
1,186
15.0
1,367
14.0
Intermountain:
Montana
25,014
2.6
7,026
5.1
3,628
7.1
3,398
7.4
Nevada
11,089
4.7
212
36.8
93
55.7
120
49.1
New Mexico
16,682
1.9
6,331
3.1
6,331
3.1
-
Utah
-
17,962
2.0
3,013
5.5
1,941
6.8
1,071
9.2
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
11,445
144,905
2.1
0.9
1,942
33,819
5.4
1.9
1,655
20,399
5.8
2.4
287
13,420
14.3
3.2
Rocky Mountain total:
150,661
0.9
37,906
1.8
24,135
2.1
13,772
3.1
126,869
1.2
35,875
2.5
4,058
7.3
31,818
2.7
126,869
1.2
35,875
2.5
4,058
7.3
31,818
2.7
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska
Alaska total:
Pacific Northwest:
Oregon
30,169
1.5
11,059
2.6
4,257
4.2
6,802
3.3
22,279
1.9
9,806
3.0
2,717
5.8
7,088
3.6
52,449
1.2
20,864
2.0
6,974
3.4
13,890
2.4
32,817
1.4
13,202
2.4
7,897
3.1
5,305
3.8
1,748
34,565
9.0
1.4
1,155
14,357
10.9
2.4
1,031
8,928
11.5
3.0
124
5,429
35.5
3.8
Pacific Coast total:
213,883
0.8
71,097
1.5
19,960
2.3
51,137
1.8
United States total:
751,228
0.3
423,029
0.4
263,658
0.4
159,371
0.8
Washington
Pacific Northwest total:
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
46
Table B. (continued)
Public
Region, subregion,
and state
Total
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Federal
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
State
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Local
Acres
SE a
Thousands Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
112
22.3
73
27.6
20
53.5
19
53.9
Nebraska
153
19.6
81
26.8
52
33.4
19
55.3
North Dakota
214
16.5
157
19.3
46
35.5
11
72.5
South Dakota
1,190
7.0
1,138
7.1
52
33.6
-
Great Plains total:
1,669
5.9
1,449
6.3
170
18.5
49
Arizona
11,291
2.8
9,658
3.0
1,609
7.7
24
63.7
Colorado
17,252
2.3
16,590
2.3
603
15.2
58
50.0
34.1
Intermountain:
Idaho
18,877
3.2
17,342
3.3
1,535
13.1
-
Montana
17,987
2.9
17,175
3.0
799
15.3
13
-
Nevada
10,876
4.7
10,824
4.8
52
74.2
-
-
New Mexico
10,351
2.4
9,522
2.5
825
9.1
3
152.3
Utah
120.0
14,950
2.2
13,425
2.3
1,514
7.7
11
90.8
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
9,503
111,086
2.3
1.1
9,084
103,620
2.3
1.1
419
7,357
11.8
4.4
109
34.8
Rocky Mountain total:
112,755
1.0
105,070
1.1
7,527
4.3
159
26.2
90,994
1.4
63,423
1.7
27,469
2.7
101
46.1
90,994
1.4
63,423
1.7
27,469
2.7
101
46.1
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska
Alaska total:
Pacific Northwest:
Oregon
19,111
1.8
17,960
1.8
969
8.7
181
20.6
Washington
12,474
2.5
9,536
2.8
2,580
5.9
358
16.1
31,584
1.5
27,496
1.5
3,549
4.9
539
12.7
19,614
1.8
18,409
1.8
831
10.1
375
15.3
593
20,208
15.7
1.8
12
18,421
114.3
1.8
573
1,404
16.0
8.8
8
383
141.2
15.3
Pacific Coast total:
142,786
1.0
109,340
1.1
32,422
2.4
1,023
9.9
United States total:
328,199
0.6
248,413
0.7
68,831
1.3
10,955
2.1
Pacific Northwest total:
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
a
SE = sampling error
Note: Data may not add to totals due to rounding
47
Table C.--Area and number of private forests in the United States by region, subregion, and
state, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
SE a
Region, subregion, and state
Acres
Number
Thousands
Thousands
Percent
Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
Delaware
Maine
1,383
7.4
108
21.7
351
11.6
55
57.1
16,575
1.3
252
13.1
Maryland
1,957
4.8
157
24.5
Massachusetts
2,179
5.8
293
18.8
New Hampshire
3,646
3.8
128
23.8
New Jersey
1,322
5.7
122
28.1
12.9
New York
14,438
1.9
687
Pennsylvania
11,738
1.7
497
6.8
Rhode Island
303
10.8
38
29.8
Vermont
3,864
2.7
88
19.2
10,418
1.6
251
22.4
68,175
0.7
2,677
5.5
Illinois
3,730
3.6
184
13.3
Indiana
3,888
3.2
225
10.8
Iowa
2,552
4.5
150
17.6
12,117
1.2
498
9.1
8.5
West Virginia
Northeast total:
North Central:
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Ohio
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
7,114
1.8
202
12,393
1.6
359
7.2
6,973
2.6
345
10.0
11,117
1.2
362
6.8
59,885
0.7
2,325
3.5
128,060
0.5
5,002
3.4
South:
Southeast:
Florida
11,427
2.4
509
22.6
Georgia
22,440
1.1
524
10.9
North Carolina
15,497
1.9
525
12.1
South Carolina
11,189
1.8
301
13.9
13,000
1.2
410
13.3
73,553
0.7
2,269
7.0
Virginia
Southeast total:
South Central:
Alabama
21,264
1.1
412
11.5
Arkansas
15,156
1.4
346
22.7
Kentucky
10,647
1.6
473
14.5
Louisiana
12,512
1.8
131
17.9
Mississippi
17,320
1.3
370
48.6
Oklahoma
7,000
2.8
71
13.9
Tennessee
Texas
South Central total:
South total:
48
12,310
1.6
534
11.6
16,204
1.2
354
12.0
112,412
0.6
2,690
9.8
185,965
0.4
4,960
5.4
Table C. (continued)
Area
Region, subregion, and state
Acres
Thousands
Owners
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
1,994
5.1
103
18.9
Nebraska
1,092
7.2
57
33.1
510
10.7
24
48.6
North Dakota
South Dakota
Great Plains total:
492
10.9
12
37.4
4,088
3.7
196
15.2
Arizona
7,381
3.5
45
40.5
Colorado
5,360
5.0
186
39.1
Idaho
2,553
10.2
34
54.6
Montana
7,026
5.1
40
22.9
212
36.8
15
64.1
New Mexico
6,331
3.1
81
81.7
Utah
3,013
5.5
66
59.5
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
1,942
33,819
5.4
1.8
24
491
47.5
22.5
Rocky Mountain total:
37,906
1.7
687
16.7
35,875
2.5
82
89.3
35,875
2.5
82
89.3
11,059
2.6
149
16.8
9,806
3.0
215
18.9
20,864
2.0
364
13.1
13,202
2.4
202
19.1
1,155
14,357
0.2
2.2
25
227
53.5
18.0
Pacific Coast total:
71,097
1.5
673
14.3
United States total:
423,029
0.4
11,322
3.1
Intermountain:
Nevada
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska
Alaska total:
Pacific Northwest:
Oregon
Washington
Pacific Northwest total:
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
a
SE = sampling error
Note: Data may not add to totals due to rounding
49
Table D.--Area and number of nonindustrial private forests in the United States by region,
subregion, and state, 2006
Area
Owners
Region, subregion,
SE a
SE a
and state
Acres
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
Delaware
1,383
7.4
108
21.7
325
12.0
55
57.1
12,082
1.5
252
13.1
Maryland
1,869
4.9
157
24.5
Massachusetts
2,179
5.8
293
18.8
New Hampshire
3,451
3.8
128
23.8
New Jersey
1,322
5.7
122
28.1
12.9
Maine
New York
13,710
1.9
686
Pennsylvania
11,505
1.7
497
6.8
Rhode Island
303
10.8
38
29.8
3,612
2.8
88
19.2
10,418
1.6
251
22.4
62,158
0.8
2,677
5.5
Illinois
3,725
3.6
184
13.3
Indiana
3,870
3.2
225
10.8
Vermont
West Virginia
Northeast total:
North Central:
Iowa
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
2,552
4.5
150
17.6
10,988
1.3
498
9.1
6,467
1.9
202
8.5
12,234
1.6
359
7.2
6,780
2.6
345
10.0
10,438
1.3
362
6.8
57,055
0.7
2,324
3.5
119,213
0.5
5,001
3.4
Florida
9,652
2.7
509
22.6
Georgia
18,172
1.2
524
10.9
North Carolina
13,969
1.9
525
12.1
South Carolina
9,712
1.9
301
13.9
12,256
1.2
410
13.3
63,762
0.8
2,269
7.0
Alabama
17,765
1.2
412
11.5
Arkansas
10,983
1.7
345
22.7
Kentucky
10,398
1.6
473
14.5
Louisiana
8,250
2.2
131
17.9
Mississippi
15,340
1.4
370
48.6
Ohio
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
South:
Southeast:
Virginia
Southeast total:
South Central:
Oklahoma
5,952
2.9
71
43.1
Tennessee
11,206
1.6
534
11.6
12,996
1.4
354
41.2
92,891
0.6
2,690
10.9
156,652
0.5
4,945
6.1
Texas
South Central total:
South total:
50
Table D. (continued)
Region, subregion,
and state
Area
Acres
Thousands
Owners
SE
a
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
1,994
Nebraska
5.1
103
18.9
33.1
1,092
7.2
57
North Dakota
510
10.7
24
48.6
South Dakota
Great Plains total:
492
10.9
12
37.4
4,088
3.7
196
15.2
Arizona
7,381
3.5
45
40.5
Colorado
5,360
5.0
186
39.1
Idaho
1,427
13.7
34
54.6
Montana
5,430
5.8
40
22.9
212
36.8
15
64.1
6,331
3.1
81
81.7
Intermountain:
Nevada
New Mexico
Utah
3,013
5.5
66
59.5
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
1,942
5.4
24
47.5
31,097
1.9
491
22.5
Rocky Mountain total:
35,184
1.8
687
16.7
35,875
2.5
82
89.3
35,875
2.5
82
89.3
Oregon
6,970
3.3
149
16.9
Washington
6,510
3.8
215
18.9
13,480
2.5
364
13.1
10,101
2.7
202
19.1
1,155
11,256
15.0
2.9
25
227
53.5
18.0
Pacific Coast total:
60,612
1.7
673
14.3
United States total:
371,661
0.4
11,307
3.3
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska
Alaska total:
Pacific Northwest:
Pacific Northwest total:
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
a
SE = sampling error
Note: Data may not add to totals due to rounding
51
Table E.--Area and number of family forests in the United States by region, subregion, and
state, 2006
Area
Owners
Region, subregion,
SE a
SE a
Acres
Number
and state
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
North:
Northeast:
Connecticut
898
8.7
101
22.8
Delaware
244
13.7
28
54.3
Maine
5,727
2.2
233
13.8
Maryland
1,462
5.4
156
24.7
Massachusetts
1,686
6.2
290
19.0
New Hampshire
2,358
4.3
124
24.6
805
7.3
120
28.5
11,252
2.0
614
10.8
8,906
1.8
469
6.9
30.9
New Jersey
New York
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Vermont
West Virginia
Northeast total:
204
12.5
37
3,109
2.8
87
19.3
7,174
1.8
243
23.1
43,825
0.9
2,502
5.3
North Central:
Illinois
3,465
3.7
177
13.6
Indiana
3,471
3.4
218
11.1
Iowa
2,449
4.5
147
17.9
Michigan
8,956
1.4
438
4.9
Minnesota
5,390
2.0
194
8.6
11,605
1.6
339
7.3
5,796
2.7
336
10.2
Missouri
Ohio
Wisconsin
North Central total:
North total:
9,083
1.3
352
6.9
50,215
0.8
2,201
3.2
94,041
0.6
4,703
3.2
South:
Southeast:
Florida
4,900
3.7
404
20.9
Georgia
14,338
1.3
504
11.1
North Carolina
11,194
2.1
469
11.8
South Carolina
7,320
2.1
262
12.6
9,992
1.3
402
13.6
47,744
0.8
2,042
6.5
Alabama
14,792
1.3
399
11.8
Arkansas
9,390
1.8
343
22.9
Kentucky
9,103
1.7
467
14.7
Louisiana
5,815
2.5
105
17.0
Mississippi
12,146
1.4
163
14.0
Oklahoma
5,716
2.7
52
13.5
Tennessee
9,975
1.7
531
11.7
10,841
1.2
344
11.9
77,779
0.7
2,403
6.2
125,522
0.5
4,445
4.2
Virginia
Southeast total:
South Central:
Texas
South Central total:
South total:
52
Table E. (continued)
Region, subregion,
and state
Area
Acres
Thousands
Owners
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Rocky Mountain:
Great Plains:
Kansas
1,906
5.2
101
19.2
Nebraska
1,054
7.4
54
34.2
North Dakota
424
11.7
24
48.7
South Dakota
Great Plains total:
352
12.9
12
39.0
3,736
3.8
191
15.5
Arizona
1,371
8.4
44
41.3
Colorado
4,193
5.6
182
39.8
Idaho
1,186
15.0
34
55.2
Montana
3,628
7.1
38
23.8
93
55.6
11
64.1
Intermountain:
Nevada
New Mexico
6,331
3.1
81
81.7
Utah
1,941
6.8
64
62.1
Wyoming
Intermountain total:
1,655
20,399
5.8
2.4
24
478
47.9
23.1
Rocky Mountain total:
24,135
2.1
669
17.1
Pacific Coast:
Alaska:
Alaska
Alaska total:
4,058
7.3
16
119.3
4,058
7.3
16
119.3
Pacific Northwest:
Oregon
4,257
4.2
141
17.4
2,717
5.8
213
19.2
6,974
3.4
354
13.5
7,897
3.1
197
19.6
1,031
8,928
11.5
3.0
14
210
53.5
18.7
Pacific Coast total:
19,960
2.3
581
11.1
United States total:
263,658
0.4
10,398
2.6
Washington
Pacific Northwest total:
Pacific Southwest:
California
Hawaii
Pacific Southwest total:
a
SE = sampling error
53
Family Forest Owners of the United States*, 2006
As with all estimates derived from surveys, sampling errors should be considered when interpreting the
results. Estimates with sampling errors of 25 percent or more should be used cautiously. Estimates with
sampling errors of 50 percent or more should be used very cautiously.
Citation: Butler, B.J. 2008. Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27.
Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Table US-1.--Number of responses and cooperation rate for family forest
owners who participated in the U.S. Forest Services' National Woodland
Owner Survey between 2002 and 2006 in the United States*
Surveys
sent
Number of
undeliverables
Number of
responses
Cooperation
rate
Percent
35,121
5,029
15,440
51.3
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western
Texas.
Table US-2.--Area of forest land in the United States*
by ownership category, 2006
Ownership
category
Area
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Percent
Private
Family
251,974
0.4
Other private
127,943
0.8
Total private
379,917
1.1
185,977
0.8
Public
Federal
State
41,964
1.7
Local
10,850
2.0
Total public
Total
238,791
0.7
618,708
0.4
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western
Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
54
Table US-3.--Area and number of private forests in the United States* by size of
forest landholdings, 2006
Size of forest
landholdings
Acres
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
1-9
20,661
7.2
6,821
5.2
10-19
18,475
6.3
1,496
3.7
20-49
42,591
3.4
1,465
2.5
50-99
44,020
3.2
683
2.4
100-199
43,770
3.5
372
4.8
200-499
47,300
3.6
185
3.8
500-999
25,578
5.9
45
5.4
1,000-4,999
42,229
5.0
28
6.3
5,000-9,999
12,677
15.2
2
13.6
10,000+
Total
Percent
82,617
2.6
9
47.9
379,917
0.4
11,108
3.2
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
Table US-4.--Area and number of nonindustrial private forests in the United
States* by size of forest landholdings, 2006
Size of forest
landholdings
Acres
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
1-9
20,661
7.2
6,821
5.2
10-19
18,475
6.3
1,496
3.7
20-49
42,591
3.4
1,465
2.5
50-99
44,020
3.2
683
2.4
100-199
43,770
3.5
372
4.8
200-499
47,300
3.6
185
3.8
500-999
25,578
5.9
45
5.4
1,000-4,999
42,229
5.0
28
6.3
5,000-9,999
12,677
15.2
2
13.6
10,000+
Total
Percent
31,249
6.6
8
54.9
328,549
0.4
11,107
3.2
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
55
Table US-5.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by size of
forest landholdings, 2006
Size of forest
landholdings
Acres
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
1-9
19,158
6.4
6,221
4.4
10-19
17,691
6.5
1,430
3.7
20-49
40,894
3.4
1,402
2.5
50-99
41,562
3.2
644
2.3
100-199
38,946
3.5
318
2.6
200-499
39,926
3.7
158
4.2
500-999
18,795
7.0
32
5.3
1,000-4,999
25,127
5.8
18
8.8
5,000-9,999
4,217
19.8
1
11.6
5,659
18.3
<1
21.0
251,974
0.4
10,223
2.7
10,000+
Total
Percent
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
Table US-6.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by percent of
owner's land that is forested, 2006
Percent
forested
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
<25
30,435
4.7
2,657
7.2
25-49
39,291
4.1
1,392
7.2
50-74
51,909
3.3
2,402
7.4
Percent
75-99
74,217
2.5
1,536
4.7
100
No answer
46,154
3.8
1,889
8.0
9,968
11.0
348
15.8
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
Table US-7.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by number of
forested parcels, 2006
Forested
parcels
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
1
77,319
2.1
4,159
2-9
92,429
1.9
2,088
6.4
10-99
13,805
9.0
89
12.2
100+
No answer
1,701
30.4
4
22.0
66,721
2.5
3,882
4.7
Percent
4.2
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
56
Table US-8.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by type and source of forest
land acquisition, 2006
Area
Acquisition
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
Percent
Type b
Purchase
191,380
1.0
8,259
3.2
Inheritance
88,818
2.2
1,994
6.1
Other
14,723
8.9
511
15.1
5,400
19.5
183
17.2
Family
123,005
1.6
3,333
4.9
Individual
141,961
1.4
5,594
3.8
25,589
5.8
1,411
10.7
7,577
14.6
371
14.8
No answer
Source b
Other
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Categories are not exclusive.
Table US-9.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by ownership tenure, 2006
Area
Land tenure (years)
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
Percent
<10
30,567
4.4
1,891
6.9
10-24
67,704
2.5
3,330
5.2
25-49
87,157
2.2
2,998
5.9
50+
No answer
21,832
6.4
480
11.9
44,714
3.9
1,524
7.5
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
57
Table US-10.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by frequency and recipient
of forest land transfers, 2006
Area
Land transfer
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
Percent
3.3
Frequency
0 (never)
163,757
1.2
7,525
1
38,914
4.0
1,683
8.6
2-5
28,806
5.0
572
10.3
6+
11,259
11.5
79
30.1
9,237
14.0
364
13.9
Family
23,466
4.9
620
12.6
Individual
45,890
2.8
1,302
8.5
Other
21,623
4.9
540
18.6
7,066
11.9
239
16.7
Yes
39,921
3.1
1,079
9.8
No
203,214
0.7
8,821
3.1
8,840
8.3
323
13.4
No answer
Recipient b
No answer
Transferred in last 5 years
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
b
Categories are not exclusive.
Table US-11.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by form of ownership, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
207,400
0.9
9,286
3.3
Family partnership
40,506
4.2
631
12.9
Trust
22,974
6.6
367
11.3
7,354
13.8
167
33.0
3,945
23.8
232
28.3
Form of ownership
a
Individual or joint
Other
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
58
SE = sampling error
SE b
Percent
Table US-12.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* that are associated with
owners' farms, primary homes, and vacation homes, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
Yes
100,030
1.7
2,389
5.3
No
143,767
1.2
7,521
3.3
8,177
12.7
313
14.4
Yes
139,160
1.3
7,054
3.4
No
95,379
1.8
2,598
5.5
No answer
17,435
7.5
572
10.2
Yes
48,766
3.2
1,078
7.5
No
176,246
1.0
8,145
3.1
26,961
5.3
1,000
8.1
Associated with a
SE b
Percent
Owner's farm
No answer
Owner's home (primary residence)
Owner's vacation home or cabin
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
Categories are not exclusive.
b
SE = sampling error
Table US-13.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by reason for owning
forest land, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each objective as very important
(1) or important (2) on a seven-point Likert scale.
Area
Reason a
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
160,601
SE b
Percent
1.1
Number
Thousands
7,159
Percent
3.4
130,403
1.4
5,489
3.7
117,868
1.5
3,852
5.0
128,868
1.6
6,649
4.0
Part of farm or ranch
102,265
1.9
2,865
6.0
Privacy
To pass land on to children or
other heirs
To cultivate/collect nontimber
forest products
For production of firewood or
biofuel
135,474
1.3
6,362
3.4
150,918
1.2
4,960
3.8
25,212
5.2
753
8.4
37,667
3.8
1,274
6.6
78,634
2.0
1,023
5.7
109,928
1.6
2,682
4.9
84,983
2.0
2,899
5.2
2,967
26.7
127
22.2
To enjoy beauty or scenery
To protect nature and biologic
diversity
For land investment
Part of home or vacation home
For production of sawlogs, pulpwood or other timber products
Hunting or fishing
For recreation other than
hunting or fishing
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
SE = sampling error
59
Table US-14.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by lease status, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Yes
Thousands
55,429
No
Leased
No answer
Use b
SE a
Percent
3.0
Number
Thousands
515
Percent
8.3
185,359
0.9
9,229
2.9
11,186
10.6
479
13.6
Hunting
Recreation (other than
hunting)
17,344
7.7
60
11.4
7,822
14.6
48
18.3
Graze/pasture livestock
17,349
7.8
184
16.7
Timber production
7,570
14.7
56
17.7
Cultivate/collect nontimber
forest products
4,807
19.5
33
16.1
1,017
53.4
5
27.5
24,588
5.2
221
12.3
10.9
Other
No answer
Leased within past 5 years
Yes
41,039
3.8
278
No
194,048
0.9
9,392
2.9
597
78.4
6
46.4
16,290
8.0
548
12.1
Uncertain
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Categories are not exclusive.
Table US-15.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by status of easements
that restrict land use conversions**, 2006
Area
Easement
Yes
No
No answer
Future easement b
Yes
No
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
8,629
11.6
171
227,809
0.6
9,389
14.1
2.9
15,536
8.0
663
10.1
3,079
25.8
65
26.9
4.1
108,450
1.6
5,147
Maybe
36,383
3.9
1,146
7.0
Uncertain
30,276
4.4
1,144
7.1
No answer
49,621
3.3
1,887
7.1
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
** Despite our intention of quantifying conservation easements, many respondents included rights-ofway and other easements and their answers should be interpreted accordingly.
a
SE = sampling error
b
60
Includes only owners who currently do not have an easement.
Table US-16.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by knowledge of and
participation in sustainable forest certification programs, 2006
Area
Green certification
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
Has heard of
Yes
56,909
2.7
1,208
7.5
No
182,657
0.9
8,497
3.0
12,408
9.5
519
11.2
10,490
9.6
82
12.8
43,169
3.4
991
6.9
3,250
26.7
136
43.2
Yes
1,209
48.5
14
30.9
No
17,524
6.8
573
10.4
Maybe
No answer
Land currently enrolled b
Yes
No
No answer
Enroll land in future c
12,402
8.2
196
13.7
Uncertain
4,351
22.2
92
19.9
No answer
7,682
13.4
116
10.7
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Includes only owners who have heard of green certification.
c
Includes only owners who have heard of green certification and who currently do not have land
green certified.
Table US-17.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by participation in
cost-share programs, 2006
Area
Cost-share program
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Percent
Yes
48,909
No
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
3.2
528
188,631
0.9
9,043
2.9
14,434
8.4
652
11.3
Yes
24,839
5.5
218
14.0
No
210,390
0.7
9,347
2.8
Uncertain
1,282
49.3
28
55.6
No answer
15,463
8.2
631
11.4
No answer
8.7
Participated in past 5 years
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
61
Table US-18.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by primary
forest management decisionmaker, 2006
Primary
decisionmaker a
Owner
Area
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE b
Percent
214,897
0.7
9,236
2.9
Family member
27,426
5.3
614
13.6
Forester
26,600
4.6
192
9.0
Other
No answer
14,994
7.9
185
10.4
5,519
18.7
209
20.7
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
Categories are not exclusive.
b
62
SE = sampling error
Table US-19.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by timber harvesting activities and
reasons, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Yes
No
SE a
Percent
Number
Thousands
Percent
170,717
1.0
4,543
3.3
76,687
2.2
5,414
4.3
4,570
17.9
266
20.3
3.9
Trees harvested or removed
No answer
Products harvested b
118,744
1.5
1,891
Veneer logs
40,778
3.5
515
5.9
Pulpwood
74,407
2.0
1,048
6.8
Firewood
67,374
2.4
1,951
4.7
Posts or poles
29,091
5.4
335
8.8
4,034
21.9
158
20.6
17,044
7.4
1,059
8.9
Yes
75,538
2.2
1,118
5.8
No
85,347
2.0
3,075
4.3
Uncertain
3,010
27.7
88
23.9
No answer
6,822
13.9
262
14.8
Sawlogs
Other
No answer
Received professional consultation c
Recent harvest/removal (within 5 years)
Yes
94,271
1.9
2,043
5.0
No
145,407
1.2
7,665
3.4
2,203
32.5
90
25.5
10,093
10.6
425
12.2
Yes
135,801
1.3
2,454
4.0
No
99,129
1.7
6,710
3.7
17,044
7.4
1,059
8.9
Part of management plan
61,341
2.8
685
7.4
Trees were mature
95,225
2.0
1,571
4.5
Clear land
19,187
7.7
733
10.1
Needed money
40,774
3.9
741
7.5
Wood for personal use
41,163
4.0
1,294
5.7
Price was right
32,816
4.5
439
9.7
Improve hunting
18,317
7.4
188
9.7
Improve recreation
Remove trees damaged by natural
catastrophes
11,137
10.8
308
11.6
64,020
2.9
1,745
6.3
Improve quality of remaining trees
83,122
2.2
1,708
5.8
7,875
16.1
313
15.7
10,782
9.8
569
11.3
Uncertain
No answer
Commerical harvest d
No answer
Reason for harvest c
Other
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Categories are not exclusive.
c
Includes only owners who have harvested.
d
A commercial harvest is defined as the harvesting of sawlogs, veneer logs, or pulpwood.
63
Table US-20.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by activities related to nontimber
forest products (NTFPs), 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
Thousands
Percent
Number
Thousands
SE a
Percent
NTFPs collected or harvested
Yes
54,989
3.2
1,701
6.1
No
180,572
1.0
7,856
3.4
16,413
7.8
667
14.9
No answer
Type of NTFPs collected/harvested b,c
Edibles
30,522
4.9
1,005
6.8
Medicinals
6,865
15.3
215
20.1
Decoratives
21,254
6.8
728
10.3
2,044
41.6
27
24.4
644
66.6
34
44.2
No answer
Use b,c
12,329
7.6
285
15.3
For sale
10,273
12.4
163
20.5
For personal use
36,259
4.3
1,319
6.9
No answer
12,919
7.5
297
14.9
Yes
37,457
4.3
1,239
7.3
No
186,532
1.0
8,041
3.3
747
64.3
18
28.1
27,237
4.8
925
11.7
Cultural
Other
Recent (within past 5 years)
Uncertain
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
64
b
Categories are not exclusive.
c
Includes only owners who have collected nontimber forest products.
Table US-21.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by management plan
status, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Management plan
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
Yes
42,367
3.5
364
7.2
No
197,059
0.8
9,393
2.9
Do not remember
4,561
19.5
131
18.2
No answer
7,986
13.1
336
17.4
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Categories are not exclusive.
Table US-22.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by recent (past 5 years)
forestry activity, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE b
SE b
Activity a
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
81,810
2.2
1,125
5.0
37,457
4.3
1,239
7.3
Site preparation
40,677
3.5
822
9.1
Tree planting
65,701
2.3
1,920
5.5
Fire hazard reduction
50,938
3.1
1,294
8.1
Application of chemicals
38,917
3.6
928
9.1
Road/trail maintenance
90,058
1.9
1,685
6.5
Wildlife habitat improvement
51,518
3.0
857
7.7
Posting land
107,189
1.9
2,366
5.7
Private recreation
135,309
1.5
3,329
4.3
Public recreation
36,855
4.4
711
12.6
None of the above
41,343
3.5
3,181
5.6
Timber harvest
Collection of NTFPs
c
Percent
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
Categories are not exclusive.
b
SE = sampling error
c
NTFPs = nontimber forest products
65
Table US-23.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by advice received and
advice source, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
1.9
1,436
5.7
Advice received
Yes
91,468
No
153,493
1.1
8,504
3.1
7,013
14.8
284
18.5
No answer
Advice source b
State forestry agency
45,308
3.4
548
7.0
Extension
16,687
7.5
238
16.4
Other state agency
4,267
21.7
53
16.8
Federal agency
22,982
6.1
263
11.3
Private consultant
42,300
3.4
354
8.0
Forest industry
13,060
8.0
75
9.4
Logger
17,667
6.8
220
12.9
Another landowner
14.1
16,987
6.8
269
Other
2,763
28.7
114
29.7
No answer
9,381
11.7
351
16.0
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
66
Categories are not exclusive.
Table US-24.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by preferred methods to receive forest
management information, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each method as very useful (1) or
useful (2) on a seven-point Likert scale.
Area
Method
a
Publications, books, or pamphlets
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
107,594
SE b
Percent
1.8
Number
Thousands
3,822
Percent
4.5
5.2
Newsletters, magazines, or newspapers
91,275
2.1
3,210
Internet/web
Conferences, workshops, or video
conferences
50,146
3.4
2,402
6.4
39,102
4.3
975
10.1
Video tapes for home viewing
55,621
3.1
2,207
6.5
Television or radio programs
43,339
3.7
1,848
7.1
Visiting other woodlands or field trips
Talking with a forester or other natural
resource professional
50,236
3.2
1,372
7.4
116,243
1.7
3,246
5.0
Talking with other woodland owners
66,698
2.6
1,633
6.5
Talking with a logging contractor
35,169
4.6
813
10.1
Membership in a land owner organization
33,812
4.8
739
8.8
No answer
13,489
8.7
713
11.0
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
SE = sampling error
67
Table US-25.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by landowners'
sociopolitical concerns, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each issue as a very
important (1) or important (2) concern on a seven-point Likert scale.
Area
Concern a
Dealing with an endangered
species
High property taxes
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
66,269
Percent
2.8
Number
Thousands
2,307
SE b
Percent
6.8
128,970
1.5
4,978
4.2
140,890
1.4
4,622
4.1
Lawsuits
73,169
2.6
2,286
6.1
Regulations that restrict
harvesting
Development of nearby lands
75,693
2.5
2,237
7.6
82,092
2.3
3,785
4.8
Damage or noise from
motorized vehicles
Trespassing or poaching
65,686
2.8
3,112
5.3
130,388
1.5
4,560
4.2
66,876
2.6
2,512
6.0
118,651
1.7
4,608
4.3
9,043
11.4
521
15.5
Keeping land intact for heirs
Timber theft
Misuse of forest land, such as
vandalism or dumping
No anwer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
SE = sampling error
Table US-26.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by landowners' forest
health concerns, 2006. Numbers include landowners who ranked each issue as a very
important (1) or important (2) concern on a seven-point Likert scale.
Area
Concern a
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
Percent
Percent
4.7
Air or water pollution
88,191
2.0
4,349
Undesirable plants
84,141
2.2
3,243
5.0
Domestic animals
22,529
6.2
1,026
10.7
Wild animals
37,491
4.0
1,614
6.4
Fire
132,164
1.5
4,916
4.5
Insects or plant diseases
140,848
1.4
4,945
4.1
Lack of new trees
48,274
3.5
2,373
6.6
Wind or ice storms
89,918
2.0
3,740
5.3
No answer
10,187
10.4
526
12.2
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
68
SE b
Number
Thousands
SE = sampling error
Table US-27.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by landowners' future (next 5 years)
plans for their forest land, 2006
Area
Future plans a
Leave it as is - no activity
Owners
Acres
SE b
Thousands
73,187
SE b
Percent
2.3
Number
Thousands
4,303
Percent
4.4
4.6
Minimal activity to maintain forest land
97,189
2.0
3,352
Harvest firewood
66,358
2.4
1,978
4.3
Harvest sawlogs or pulpwood
63,034
2.5
716
6.7
Collect nontimber forest products
19,465
6.8
569
9.5
Sell some or all of their forest land
18,420
6.9
550
14.4
Give some or all of their forest land to heirs
41,588
3.8
903
6.4
5,775
17.3
118
21.4
Subdivide some or all of their forest land and
sell subdivisions
Buy more forest land
Convert some or all of their forest land to
another use
Convert another land use to forest land
31,859
4.4
699
10.1
8,914
12.0
253
15.7
17.7
7,492
12.8
157
No current plans
37,781
4.3
1,949
8.0
Unknown
13,574
9.1
651
14.1
Other
10,002
11.8
289
14.6
6,196
14.3
276
16.2
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
Categories are not exclusive.
a
b
SE = sampling error
69
Table US-28.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by primary occupation
of the primary decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Number
Occupation
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
Farmer
21,965
7.3
445
23.2
Official or manager
23,314
6.5
906
15.6
Professional
25,875
6.1
1,079
11.0
841
49.9
92
43.7
Sales worker
7,203
13.5
299
18.0
Administrative support
3,515
21.5
243
23.8
Technician
Craft worker
10,662
9.9
716
13.5
Operative
7,544
12.6
443
13.8
Laborer or helper
3,388
23.7
101
22.8
Service worker
3,176
22.1
277
22.6
Homemaker
Other b
2,809
25.4
124
28.1
39.5
Retiree
No answer
646
56.1
47
120,002
1.9
4,672
5.4
21,035
7.3
778
12.0
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Includes students, disabled, and unemployed individuals.
Table US-29.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by age of the primary
decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Number
Age (years)
Thousands
<35
Percent
Thousands
25.7
229
29.3
35-44
15,035
7.5
894
9.0
45-54
46,503
3.2
2,179
5.7
55-64
68,065
2.7
3,169
6.5
65-74
56,792
3.2
1,867
6.4
75+
46,866
3.8
1,487
6.8
No answer
15,939
8.4
398
12.1
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
70
Percent
2,774
Table US-30.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by highest level of
formal education of the primary decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
Highest level of
SE a
Acres
SE a
Number
education
Percent
Thousands
Percent
12th grade or lower
Thousands
18,871
6.7
1,046
9.3
High school or equivalent
55,902
2.6
2,624
5.5
Some college
43,183
3.5
1,882
6.1
Associate's degree
20,888
6.5
1,156
9.9
Bachelor's degree
53,437
3.0
1,550
7.1
Graduate degree
43,165
3.6
1,438
7.1
No answer
16,528
7.5
525
12.3
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
Table US-31.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by primary
decisionmaker's annual household income, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
SE a
Income
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
Less than $25,000
26,017
5.6
1,474
7.8
$25,000 - $49,999
54,847
3.1
2,573
6.3
$50,000 - $99,999
69,883
2.6
3,134
5.0
$100,000 - $199,000
34,480
4.6
1,278
10.3
$200,000 or more
21,183
6.0
301
13.8
No answer
45,565
3.8
1,464
7.8
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
Table US-32.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by gender of the
primary decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Gender
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
183,603
0.9
7,013
3.3
Female
Both b
33,757
4.3
1,640
6.2
19,352
6.6
1,072
9.6
No answer
15,262
8.2
498
13.1
Male
Percent
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
b
Respondent indicated joint decisionmakers, at least one male and one female.
71
Table US-33.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by ethnicity and race of the
primary decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
SE a
Acres
SE a
Ethnicity and race
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
Non-Hispanic/Latino
No answer
3,333
32.2
110
220,343
0.8
9,116
33.6
3.1
28,298
5.5
998
9.2
1,203
48.3
56
42.3
429
78.7
17
46.6
1,731
29.9
163
22.9
209
102.2
32
60.0
224,885
0.7
9,116
3.1
4,494
19.8
217
17.6
19,024
7.6
623
12.6
Race
People reporting a single race
American Indian or Alaska
Native
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or other
Pacific Islander
White
Two or more races
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
a
SE = sampling error
Table US-34.--Area and number of family forests in the United States* by disability of the primary
decisionmaker, 2006
Area
Owners
Acres
SE a
SE a
Disability
Number
Thousands
Percent
Thousands
Percent
Vision or hearing
Yes
19,536
6.4
712
9.5
No
212,366
0.7
8,945
3.2
20,072
6.9
566
10.7
Yes
40,340
4.0
1,584
7.2
No
191,444
0.9
8,074
3.3
20,190
6.9
566
10.3
No answer
Physical (e.g., mobility)
No answer
* Excluding interior Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, western Oklahoma, and western Texas.
SE = sampling error
a
72
The survey instruments and other material are available at:
http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/nwos/
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on
the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial
status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because
all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication
of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at
(202)720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office
of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800)795-3272
(voice) or (202)720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Printed on Recycled Paper
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Modified | 2008-07-21 |
| File Created | 2008-06-16 |