Open Government Citizen Engagement Ratings, Rankings, and Flagging

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
3090-00XX-OpenGovtCitizen-Supporting Statement Part A-2-1-2010.doc Supporting Statement A	2010-02-01
3090-00XX-OpenGovtCitizen-IdeaRatingsPage.doc Supplementary Document	2010-01-25
3090-00XX-OpenGovtCitizen-Supporting-Statement-Part-B-2-1-10.doc Supporting Statement B	2010-02-01

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
191836	Open Government Citizen Engagement Ratings, Rankings, and Flagging Other-Website	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3090-0288	ICR Reference No: 201001-3090-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: GSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Open Government Citizen Engagement Ratings, Rankings, and Flagging
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Emergency	Approval Requested By: 07/31/2010
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 02/01/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 01/25/2010
Terms of Clearance: The collection is approved based on the revised materials provided by the agency and is valid for 6 months only. Should GSA decide to continue use the collection past the approved emergency request clearance time period, it must resubmit to OMB under the normal PRA clearance process.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2010	6 Months From Approved
Responses	1,200,000	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,666	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The “Open Government Citizen Engagement” is a response to the Open Government Directive, which was issued on December 8, 2009 by the Director of OMB. This directive asked that executive departments and agencies take specific actions to implement the principles of transparency, participation and collaboration, as set forth in the President’s January 21, 2009 Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government. GSA is creating an Open Government Citizen Engagement tool, an online collaboration tool powered by IdeaScale, as one example of methods for agencies to use in extensively engaging the public. The Open Government Citizen Engagement will allow the public to weigh in on their support for agency and public ideas, comments, suggestions, data sets, and the like, and allow agencies to engage with the public via Ratings, Rankings and Flaggings. The goal is to allow the public to rate and rank open-ended, general questions, comments and suggestions. Tools that allow rating, ranking and flagging (for example, many blogs, ideation, challenge grant platforms, and other social media tools) can be used across government. This information collection request for an emergency clearance is being submitted in order to fulfill the public engagement aspects of the Open Government initiative, and to allow all agencies to use this and similar rating, ranking, voting and flagging tools in this exercise and other exercises and meet the goals of Open Government.

Emergency Justfication: The Open Government Directive was issued on December 8, 2009 with tight deadlines of 45, 60, 90 and 120 days to meet various open government requirements. For example, agencies must have an agency.gov/open web page live by February 6 and include ways to engage the public during creation of the agency’s open government plan which must be completed by April 7, 2010. An emergency clearance is necessary for GSA and other agencies working under considerable time constraints to meet the requirements of the Directive due to OIRA’s interpretation that the PRA applies to optional visitor voting/ranking/rating/flagging feedback mechanisms. Some of the innovative mechanisms agencies choose to increase public participation and collaboration, as required by the directive, will allow the public to vote for / against an idea or otherwise rate or rank ideas and general comments and questions. Additional feedback mechanisms will be deployed as the culture of Open Government matures across agencies, and as visitor feedback and stakeholder needs dictate. Therefore, this six-month emergency clearance standard form ICR and a burden hour budget is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget by GSA on behalf of all federal agencies.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Open Government Citizen Engagement Ratings, Rankings, and Flagging

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	1,200,000	0	0	1,200,000	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,666	0	0	1,666	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a request for a new six-month emergency clearance ICR to allow agencies to participate and collaborate with the public to meet the requirements and goals of the Open Government Directive.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government:

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 01/25/2010

---