Corporate Security Review (CSR)

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Response Letter to IME.doc Supplementary Document	2010-06-24
IME Comment Letter.pdf Supplementary Document	2010-06-24
Response to Letter from ABA and ATA.docx Supplementary Document	2010-06-24
ABA ATA Comment Letter.pdf Supplementary Document	2010-06-24
Narrative_of_Revisions_1652-0036.doc Supplementary Document	2010-04-16
30-day-reinstm_CSR-Hwy-74FR57326_110509.pdf Supplementary Document	2009-11-05
CSR Hwy FR-60_reinstm_74FR28264.pdf Supplementary Document	2009-11-05
Aviation_and_Transportation_Security_Act_ATSA_Public_Law_107_1771.pdf Supplementary Document	2009-11-05
CSR Hwy_Supp Stmt Reinstatement_FINAL.doc Supporting Statement A	2009-11-05

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
192603	Corporate Security Review Interview Form - Hazmat Instruction	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1652-0036	ICR Reference No: 200911-1652-005
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200602-1652-001
Agency/Subagency: DHS/TSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Corporate Security Review (CSR)
Type of Information Collection: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 07/15/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 04/23/2010
Terms of Clearance: This collection is approved for one year. Consistent with the Surface Transportation Security Priority Assessment Implementation Plan, TSA should work with the DoT to implement an integrated Federal approach for security assessments, audits, and inspections to produce more thorough evaluations and effective follow-up actions for reducing risk, enhancing security, and minimizing burdens on assessed surface transportation entities. TSA should also coordinate data requests with the established single data repository to avoid redundant efforts, take advantage of existing data sets, and establish data access control. Within six months TSA should provide to OMB a status report regarding these efforts.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2011	36 Months From Approved
Responses	400	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,200	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: TSA needs the results of the CSR program questions to establish the current state of security practices for highway modes of transportation. TSA will then be able to make policy and programmatic decisions to improve the overall security posture within the surface transportation community. The data collected also can be utilized to develop security practice assessments and issue security guidelines, best practices, and lessons learned for the stakeholder community. Respondents are major transportation asset owners and operators.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 71 115 Stat. 597 (Nov 19, 2001) Name of Law: Aviation and Transportation Security Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 28264	06/15/2009
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 57326	11/05/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Corporate Security Review Interview Form - Hazmat	TSA-1603-1	Corporate Security Review Interview Form - Hazmat

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	400	0	0	400	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,200	0	0	1,200	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The population of the assessment of the industry expanded.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $83,200

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 04/23/2010

---