24-hour Dietary Recall Comparison Study and National Cancer Institute Validation and Observational Feeding Study (NCI)

ICR 200908-0925-001

OMB: 0925-0605

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Supporting Statement B
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-08-03
Supplementary Document
2009-07-31
Supporting Statement A
2009-08-03
ICR Details
0925-0605 200908-0925-001
Historical Active
HHS/NIH
24-hour Dietary Recall Comparison Study and National Cancer Institute Validation and Observational Feeding Study (NCI)
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 10/20/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 08/10/2009
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
10/31/2011 24 Months From Approved
3,499 0 0
1,054 0 0
0 0 0

Currently, the interviewer-administered 24-hour dietary recall (24HR) is considered the best dietary data collection methodology. It provides the highest quality and least biased food intake data for a single day (past 24 hours). The newly developed web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall (ASA24) transforms 24HR methodology into a convenient, self-administered, low-cost method of collecting dietary intake data. Because it is web-based, self-administered, and uses 24HR methodology, the ASA24 makes it feasible to collect multiple days of dietary intake data in large-scale studies. The web-based, automated data collection system also offers the advantage of automated coding of food items and calculation of nutrient intakes. A single day of 24HR data will be collected from a sample of eligible participants either once or twice within a six week period using the ASA24 and the AMPM. Dietary intake from the new ASA24 method will be compared to dietary intake data from the standard AMPM method. The findings from this study will provide information on the feasibility and validity of the ASA24 relative to the standard AMPM methodology. The ASA24 method would offer a low-cost alternative to the AMPM method, and thus could allow a wider use of 24HR methodology within existing resources.

US Code: 42 USC 285a-1 Name of Law: Public Health Service Act
   US Code: 42 USC 285a-2 Name of Law: Public Health Service Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  74 FR 26702 06/03/2009
74 FR 39962 08/10/2009
Yes

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 3,499 0 0 3,499 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,054 0 0 1,054 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new collection.

$547,487
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Marilyn Tuttleman 3015947949 mtuttleman@od.nih.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
08/10/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy