Ps-5-91sup

PS-5-91SUP.doc

PS-5-91 (Final) Limitations on Percentage Depletion in the Case of Oil and Gas Wells

OMB: 1545-1251

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Because the depletion allowance with respect to production from domestic oil and gas properties is computed by the partners and not by the partnership, section 1.613A-3(e)(6)(i) requires each partner to separately keep records of the partner’s share of the adjusted basis in each oil and gas property of the partnership.


2. USE OF DATA


The recordkeeping requirement will be used to verify that the partners’ adjusted bases in oil and gas properties have been adjusted to reflect the depletion allowance.

3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


We have no plans to offer electronic filing. IRS publication, regulations, notices and letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


These regulations initially were published in the Federal Register as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on May 13, 1991, which provided the general public the opportunity to review and provide public comments relating to any aspect of the proposed regulations.


A public hearing was held with respect to the notice of proposed rulemaking. Several comments were received. However, there were

no comments on the recordkeeping requirement of section 1.613A-3(e)(6)(i). The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on September 23, 1992.


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice (74 FR 15052), dated April 2, 2009.


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.613A-3(e)(6)(i) requires each partner to separately keep records of the partner’s share of the adjusted basis in each oil and gas property of the partnership. This information is used to verify that the partners’ adjusted bases in oil and gas property have been adjusted to reflect the depletion allowance. It is estimated that approximately 1,500,000 persons are subject to this requirement and it takes approximately .0333 hours to maintain the records. Total burden for recordkeepers is 49,950 hours.


Estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown above are not available at this time.


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated

April 2, 2009, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any responses from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of these cost burdens are not available at this time.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.




15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


18. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.







Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.





File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
Authorqhrfb
Last Modified ByJ11FB
File Modified2009-07-22
File Created2006-05-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy