The Appliance Labeling Rule: proposed additions for metal halide fixtures

ICR 200811-3084-005

OMB: 3084-0069

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2008-11-17
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
3084-0069 200811-3084-005
Historical Active 200811-3084-004
FTC
The Appliance Labeling Rule: proposed additions for metal halide fixtures
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 01/29/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 11/17/2008
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
05/31/2011 05/31/2011 05/31/2011
5,220 0 5,040
507,225 0 506,505
5,801,422 0 5,801,422

The Rule requires manufacturers to disclose energy information about major household appliances to enable consumers purchasing appliances to compare energy (or water use) of competing models. The Rule's goal is to help consumers conserve energy by enabling them to compare competing products. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires the FTC to issue labeling and reporting rules for metal halide lamp fixtures and ballasts.

US Code: 42 USC 6294 Name of Law: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975
   PL: Pub.L. 110 - 140 324(d) Name of Law: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
  
US Code: 42 USC 6291 et seq. Name of Law: Energy Policy and Conservation Act
PL: Pub.L. 110 - 140 324(d) Name of Law: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007

3084-AB11 Final or interim final rulemaking 73 FR 39221 07/09/2008

No

3
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Metal halide manufacturers reporting
Metal halide manufacturers recordkeeping
The Appliance Labeling Rule

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 5,220 5,040 0 0 180 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 507,225 506,505 0 0 720 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 5,801,422 5,801,422 0 0 0 0
No
No
Although the substantive aspect of the final rule’s reporting modification does not affect PRA information collection, the FTC, consistent with its preamble discussion for the final rule, is revising its prior estimate of reporting burden hours. The lone commenter on the PRA questioned the FTC’s reporting burden estimate, arguing that staff should have taken into account the many product lines (“well over 100”) in the industry and not just the number of manufacturers. Accordingly, in revising its prior estimate, staff is assuming there are 110 divisions or product lines and that reporting will require six hours apiece.

No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Hampton Newsome 202 326-2889 hnewsome@ftc.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
11/17/2008


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy