1625-0093
Supporting Statement
for
Facilities
Transferring Oil or Hazardous Materials in Bulk --
Letter of
Intent and Operations Manual
A. Justification
1. Circumstances that make the collection necessary.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) requires the issuance of regulations to prevent the discharge of oil or hazardous materials from facilities. It also requires the monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping regarding discharges of oil or hazardous materials by facilities (33 U.S.C. 1321(j)(1)(C) and (D), (j)(6) and (m)(2)). Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12777, 56 FR 54757, the responsibility for issuing these regulations was delegated to the U.S. Coast Guard.
The Letter of Intent covered in 33 CFR 154.110 serves as the official notice from a facility operator to the Captain of the Port (COTP) that they intend to operate a facility.
The Operations Manual regulations in 33 CFR part 154.300 through 154.325 establish procedures for facility personnel to follow when transferring oil or hazardous materials, in bulk, to or from a vessel in order to reduce the number of spills caused by human error or improper procedures. It also establishes procedures for facility personnel to follow in the event a spill occurs to control and mitigate the effects of the spill. Development of a new Operations Manual is a one-time occurrence whenever a new facility begins operation or a facility changes ownership. Amendments to manuals are used to ensure they are kept current.
This information collection supports the following strategic goals and Commandant’s Direction:
Department of Homeland Security
Protection
Coast Guard
Protection of Natural Resources
Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Directorate (CG-5)
Human and Natural Environment: Eliminate environmental damage associated with maritime transportation and operations on and around the nation’s waterways.
2) By whom, how, and for what purpose the information is to be used.
The information in a Letter of Intent alerts the local Coast Guard COTP that a facility will be transferring oil or hazardous materials in their area of operational responsibility. Generally, a Letter of Intent is required whenever a new facility is built, a closed facility is reopened for operation, or an existing facility changes ownership.
The information in an Operations Manual is used by the COTP to ensure that facility personnel follow proper and safe procedures for transferring oil or hazardous materials and to ensure facility personnel follow proper and safe procedures for dealing with any spills that occur during a transfer. The frequency with which this information is collected varies widely as is shown in Table 1 Existing Operations Manuals are updated periodically by amendments to ensure they are kept current, i.e., to reflect changes in personnel and telephone number listings and when a significant change in the facilities operation occurs. The frequency with which the amendments are received varies widely as is shown in Table 2.
The Letter of Intent, Operations Manual, and any amendments, must be retained for the life of the facility as it is used in the daily operations at the facility.
3) Consideration of the use of improved information technology.
The required information is unique to each applicant. The documents are typically sent to the Coast Guard by traditional mail (hard copy), especially the documentation for Operations Manuals because of the complexity of the documents. However, the facility can provide the same information on electronic media such as CD-ROM. Additionally, data may be stored electronically or otherwise, depending upon the facility's preference.
We estimate that over 80% of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements can be done electronically. Some Sectors report 100% of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements can be done electronically. At this time, we estimate that approximately 10% of the responses are collected electronically.
4) Efforts to identify duplication: Why similar information cannot be used.
This information is specific to each operation. No other similar federal requirement exists.
5) Methods to minimize the burden to small business, if involved.
Large corporations own the majority of the facilities covered by these regulations. Requirements for small entities are generally proportionately less due to the smaller amount of equipment and reduced number of personnel involved at the smaller facilities.
The actual amount of information required to be in the Letter of Intent is limited to the name, address and telephone number of the facility owner and operator and other readily accessible information about the facility. Also, when reviewing an Operations Manual or any amendments, COTPs are required to consider the size, complexity and capability of the facility.
6) Consequences to the Federal program if collection were conducted less frequently.
The Letter of Intent is only required to be submitted once, unless the facility changes ownership. The information in the Letter of Intent is not collected in any other form. If the COTP did not have the information about the facility operator contained in the Letter of Intent it would be difficult to contact key personnel in the event of a spill or other emergency involving the facility.
The information in an Operations Manual is collected once when a facility enters into the business of transferring bulk oil or hazardous materials to or from vessels, or when a facility changes ownership. If this information was not collected, the COTP’s would be severely restricted in their ability to ensure bulk oil and hazardous materials were being transferred in a safe and proper manner.
Amendments to the manual are collected when submitted by industry and are usually editorial changes to personnel or phone number listings. If the Operations Manual were not kept current it would lose its effectiveness because the information it contains would be incorrect or obsolete.
7) Explain any special circumstances that would cause the information collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with guidelines.
This information collection is conducted in manner consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8) Consultation.
A 60-day (See [USCG-2008-1176], January 6, 2009, 74 FR 451) and 30-day (See [USCG-2008-1176], April 10, 2009, 74 FR 16409) Notice were published in the Federal Register to obtain public comment on these collections. The USCG has not received any comments on these collections.
9) Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents.
There is no offer of monetary or material value for this information collection.
10) Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents.
There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents for this information collection.
11) Additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature.
There are no questions of sensitive nature.
12) Estimates of reporting and recordkeeping hour and cost burdens of the collection of information.
Total number of annual respondents: |
2,124 |
Total number of annual responses: |
2,124 |
Total annual hour burden: |
53,960 |
Total annual cost burden: |
$4,080,802 |
The total number of facilities is 4,344. (This is comprised of 3,273 fixed and 1,071 mobile marine transportation-related facilities.) But not all facilities interact with the Coast Guard annually. Thus, the estimated number of respondents and responses is 2,124, based on submissions of information (324 letters of intent + 252 new Operations Manuals + 1,548 amendments to Operations Manuals).
There are 36 U.S. Coast Guard COTP offices in the United States and its territories. The reporting burden to respondents will vary widely because of differences in the size, complexity and capabilities of the facilities covered by these regulations. The COTP offices in Charleston, SC, Philadelphia, PA, Memphis, TN, Morgan City, LA and Puget Sound, WA were contacted to validate the frequency that industry submits Letters of Intent, new Operations Manuals, and amendments to existing manuals. The number of facilities covered by these COTP offices represents a significant percentage of the affected industry, and these offices were contacted for previous Collection of Information (COI) renewals.
The hour and cost burden estimates are based upon the following information:
a) Letter of Intent
The majority of facilities are currently in operation and have already submitted their letters of intent. Generally, a Letter of Intent is received only when a new facility begins operations or a facility changes ownership. It is estimated that each COTP office receives, on the average, approximately 9 new letters of intent annually. The cost estimate was calculated using the appropriate wage rate categories for management ($84.00 per hour for an O-3 equivalent) and clerical ($44.00 per hour for an E-4 equivalent) from USCG Commandant Instruction (COMDTINST) 7310.1L. The industry hour burden estimates are based on 1 hour of management time and 1 hour of clerical time for a total of 2 hours per letter.
The annual estimated reporting hour burden to industry for new letters of intent is 648 hours (36 COTP offices X 9 letters/year X 2 hours/letter = 648 hours). The annual cost to industry is $41,472 (324 letters per year X $128/hour management and clerical time for each letter = $41,472).
b) Operations Manual
On average, it is estimated that each COTP office receives approximately 7 new Operations Manuals for review per year. The average reporting burden to industry for preparing and submitting a new Operations Manual is approximately 114.5 hours (24.5 or approximately 20% of the hours consist of clerical responsibilities, and the remainder is management). The annual estimated reporting hour burden to industry for new manuals is 28,854 hours (114.5 hours X 7 submissions X 36 COTP offices). The annual cost to industry for this reporting requirement is $2,176,776 (252 manuals per year X 114.5 hours/manual X $75.44/hour pro-rated management and clerical rate = $2,176,776).
On average, it is estimated that each COTP office receives approximately 43 amendments to existing Operations Manuals for review per year. The average reporting burden to industry for preparing and submitting an amendment to an Operations Manual is approximately 15.8 hours (3.1 or approximately 20% of the hours consist of clerical responsibilities, and the remainder is management). The annual estimated reporting hour burden to industry for amendments to manuals is 24,458 hours (1,548 amendments per year X 15.8 hours/amendment). The annual cost to industry for this reporting requirement is $1,862,554 (1,548 amendments per year X 15.8 hours/amendment X $76.152/hour pro-rated management and clerical rate = $1,862,554).
For new Operations Manuals, the frequency of response is on an as submitted basis from industry and will vary widely as shown in Table 1. For amendments to existing Operations Manuals, the frequency of response is on an as received basis from industry and will vary widely as shown in Table 2.
Table 1 presents the range of the reporting burden and cost for submitting a new Operations Manual as supplied by the industry representatives surveyed. Table 2 presents the range of the reporting burden and cost for submitting an amendment to an existing Operations Manual as supplied by the industry representatives surveyed.
The cost estimate was calculated using the appropriate wage rate categories for management ($84.00 per hour for an O-3 equivalent) and clerical ($44.00 per hour for an E-4 equivalent, per USCG COMDTINST 7310.1L) and the hour burden figures supplied by the industry representatives surveyed. The cost estimate varies widely depending on the nature, size and complexity of the facility.
13) Estimates of annualized capital and start-up costs.
There are no capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
14) Estimates of annualized Federal Government costs.
The annual cost to the Government is estimated to be $303,930. This was derived as follows:
1) There are 36 U.S. Coast Guard COTP offices in the United States and its territories.
2) On average, each COTP office receives approximately 9 new letters of intent per year. The estimated cost to the Federal Government to review and process the documents under this COI is calculated using the average hourly standard rate ($55.00 per hour, per USCG COMDTINST 7310.1L) for the field unit personnel who normally review and process these documents (E-5 to 0-3). The estimated burden to review and process a Letter of Intent is 1 hour, and the total estimated hour burden is 324 (9 letters per year /COTP office X 36 COTP offices X 1 hour/letter). The estimated cost burden to review the new Letters of Intent is $17,820 (324 hours X $55/hour).
3) On average, each COTP office receives approximately 7 new Operations Manuals for review per year. The estimated burden to review an Operations Manual is 14.5 hours, and the total estimated hour burden is 3,654 (7 manuals per year /COTP office X 36 COTP offices X 14.5 hours/manual). The estimated cost burden to review the Operations Manuals is $200,970 (3,654 hours X $55/hour)..
4) On average, each COTP office receives approximately 43 amendments to existing Operations Manuals for review per year. The estimated burden to review an Operations Manual amendment is 1 hour, and the total estimated hour burden is 1,548 (43 amendments per year /COTP office X 36 COTP offices X 1 hour/manual). The estimated cost burden to review the Operations Manuals is $85,140 (1,548 hours X $55/hour).
The cost to the Federal Government to review a new Operations Manual is summarized in Table 1. These costs were calculated using the average hourly standard rate ($55.00 per hour) for the field unit personnel who normally review these manuals (E-5 to 0-3) and the hour burden figures supplied by the field units surveyed. The cost estimate varies widely depending on the number of facilities within the COTP’s area of responsibility, the nature, size and complexity of the facility, the number of products transferred at the facility, the level of experience of the personnel reviewing the manual and whether or not field unit personnel have to physically visit the facility to evaluate the submitted manual. Cost estimates include administrative and recordkeeping expenses.
The cost to the Federal Government to review an amendment to an existing Operations Manual is summarized in Table 2, using assumptions similar to hose for Table 1.
15) Explain the reasons for the change in burden.
The change in burden hours is an ADJUSTMENT due to an increase in the number of Letter of Intent and Operations Manual submissions to the Coast Guard by facilities. The reporting and recordkeeping requirements and the methodology for calculation burden remains unchanged.
16) For collections of information whose results are planned to be published for statistical use, outline plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.
This information collection will not be published for statistical purposes.
17) Explain the reasons for seeking not to display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection.
The Coast Guard will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.
18) Explain each exception to the certification statement.
The Coast Guard does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.
B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods
This information collection does not employ statistical methods.
TABLE 1
Industry Coast Guard
Location |
Management Time |
Clerical Time |
Review Time |
Frequency |
Charleston |
30 |
10 |
6 |
4 per year |
Philadelphia |
60-80 |
20 |
15 |
9.3 per year |
Puget Sound |
80 |
10 |
15 |
10-15 per year |
Memphis |
160-200 |
40-80 |
8 |
4 per year |
Morgan City |
80-100 |
20-25 |
4 |
25 per year |
Industry Coast Guard
Location |
Management Time |
Clerical Time |
Review Time |
Frequency |
Charleston |
$2,520 |
$440 |
$330 |
4 per year |
Philadelphia |
5040 - 6720 |
$880 |
$825 |
9.3 per year |
Puget Sound |
$6,720 |
$440 |
$825 |
10-15 per year |
Memphis |
$13,440 - $16,800 |
$1,760 - $3,520 |
$440 |
4 per year |
Morgan City |
$6,720 - $8,400 |
$880 - $1,100 |
$220 |
25 per year |
TABLE 2
Industry Coast Guard
Location |
Management Time |
Clerical Time |
Review Time |
Frequency |
Charleston |
15-20 |
2-4 |
1 - 4 |
24 per year |
Philadelphia |
4-6 |
2 |
1 |
45 per year |
Puget Sound |
8-10 |
4 |
1 |
50-70 per year |
Memphis |
12-14 |
1-2 |
1 |
1 per year |
Morgan City |
18-20 |
4-6 |
0.5 |
320 per year |
Industry Coast Guard
Location |
Management Time |
Clerical Time |
Review Time |
Frequency |
Charleston |
$1,260 - $1,680 |
$88 - $176 |
$55 - $220 |
24 per year |
Philadelphia |
$336 - $504 |
$88 |
$55 |
45 per year |
Puget Sound |
$672 - $840 |
$176 |
$55 |
50-70 per year |
Memphis |
$1,008 - $1,176 |
$44 - $88 |
$55 |
1 per year |
Morgan City |
$1,512 - $1,680 |
$176 - $264 |
$27.5 |
320 per year |
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Statement |
| Author | GRohlck |
| Last Modified By | Arthur A. Requina |
| File Modified | 2009-08-13 |
| File Created | 2008-11-06 |