Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-formal)

ICR 200810-1902-004

OMB: 1902-0154

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2009-03-16
Supplementary Document
2008-10-03
Supporting Statement A
2009-03-16
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
44004
Modified
ICR Details
1902-0154 200810-1902-004
Historical Active 200606-1902-009
FERC FERC-545
Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-formal)
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 03/23/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/03/2008
FERC has updated the Supporting Statement to reflect a clarification in the assumptions regarding burden calculation. In addition, FERC has corrected the Annual Cost to Federal Government calculation in both the Supporting Statement and in ROCIS.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
03/31/2012 36 Months From Approved 09/30/2009
168 0 96
168,275 0 92,947
0 0 0

The data filed under FERC-545 applies to general rate change applications filed by natural gas companies under section 4(e) of the NGA to reflect changes in rates based generally upon the pipeline company’s overall costs for all rates, and charges made, demanded, or received in connection with the transportation of natural gas. Setting just and reasonable rates require a balancing of equities between the interests of the pipeline and its ratepayers. FERC sets rates for interstate pipeline services in a number of proceedings. For example, when a pipeline files to increase its rates, it makes a filing with FERC under Section 4 of the NGA. These types of filings are referred to as general Section 4 rate cases. In the proceedings, FERC reviews all of a pipeline's rates and services. A pipeline can file a general Section 4 rate case anytime it wishes, provided the pipeline did not agree otherwise in a settlement. A pipeline must demonstrate that the new rates it proposes to charge are just and reasonable. When a rate increase filing is made pursuant to Section 4, the application is typically suspended and set for hearing by FERC Order. Once the application is set for hearing, it is processed by FERC staff. The issues in the application can be settled if parties can reach a consensus. However, if the issues cannot be resolved, they will proceed to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). Whether the case is settled or proceeds to hearing, FERC will eventually need to act upon the settlement, or upon the record in the hearing. FERC is requiring in this Final Rule (RM01-5-000) to require regulated entities filing under Parts 35, 154, 284, 300 and 341 to make all tariff and rate case filings, as well as other material involved in these filings (see above) electronically. The creation of an electronic database will provide easier access to tariffs and allow the viewing of proposed tariff sections in context. One of the principal benefits of such a database is the ability to do historical research into tariffs. For example, proceedings such as complaints may involve past tariff provisions that have already been revised by the utility by the time the complaint is considered by the Commission. In order to expeditiously process such filings, the Commission, the parties, and the public need to be able to obtain the tariff provision that apply to the time period under review, rather than the currently effective tariff provision.

US Code: 15 USC 717-717w Name of Law: Natural Gas Act
   US Code: 16 USC 824 et. al. Name of Law: Federal Power Act
   PL: Pub.L. 103 - 272 or 49 U.S.C. A. Section 1. Name of Law: Interstate Commerce Act
   US Code: 15 USC 3301 et. al. Name of Law: Natural Gas Policy Act
  
PL: Pub.L. 109 - 58 312 Name of Law: Energy Policy Act 2005

1902-AC19 Final or interim final rulemaking 73 FR 57515 10/03/2008

Yes

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-formal)

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 168 96 0 72 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 168,275 92,947 0 5,218 70,110 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
Final Rule (RM01-5-000) will assist the Commission’s efforts to comply with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) by developing the capability to file electronically with the Commission via the Internet with uniform formats using software that is readily available and easy to use and also achieve the President’s Management Agenda initiatives of expanding electronic government. The provision of an electronic database of company tariffs will make such information available more efficiently and to a broader audience. The database will provide easier access to tariffs and allow the viewing of proposed tariff sections in context. One of the principal benefits of such a database is the ability to do historical research into tariffs. For example, proceedings such as complaints may involve past tariff provisions that have already been revised by the utility by the time the complaint is considered by the Commission. In order to expeditiously process such filings, the Commission, the parties, and the public need to be able to obtain the tariff provision that apply to the time period under review, rather than the currently effective tariff provision.

$1,294,905
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
H. Keith Pierce 202 502-8525 keith.pierce@ferc.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/03/2008


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy