Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) State MEP Director Survey (TW)

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) State MEP Director Survey (TW) Form	Modified
1810-0670 Prior Terms of Clearance.doc Supplementary Document	2008-10-21
2009SEA Survey Cover Letter.doc Supplementary Document	2008-08-27
Supporting statement BMEP.doc Supporting Statement A	2008-08-27

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
21414	Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) State MEP Director Survey (TW) Form	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1810-0670	ICR Reference No: 200808-1810-004
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200507-1810-001
Agency/Subagency: ED/OESE	Agency Tracking No: 03555
Title: Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) State MEP Director Survey (TW)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/28/2008
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/27/2008
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	10/31/2011	36 Months From Approved	10/31/2008
Responses	50	0	52
Time Burden (Hours)	50	0	52
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The survey collects information from State Migrant Education Programs (MEPs) on their participation in the Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) to serve children who migrate between Mexico and the U.S.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 20 USC 6398 Name of Law: Elementary and Secondary Education
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 35375	06/23/2008
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 50601	08/27/2008
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Binational Migrant Education Program (BMEP) State MEP Director Survey (TW)	N/A	SEA 2009 Survey

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	50	52	0	-2	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	50	52	0	-2	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: OME no longer funds MEP programs in Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia; therefore, the number of respondents has been reduced from 52 to 50. Each respondent is equal to one hour; therefore, the number of requested hours has also been reduced from 52 to 50.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $12,540

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/27/2008

---