Supporting Statement – Part A
Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM)
OMB Control No. 0607-0449
A. Justification
1. Necessity of the Information Collection
The Census Bureau requests a re-instatement with change of the expired collection for the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM). The Census Bureau has conducted the ASM since 1949 under the mandatory requirements of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 182, 224, 225, to provide key measures of manufacturing activity during intercensal periods. In census years ending in "2" and "7," we mail and collect the ASM as part of the Economic Census Covering the Manufacturing Sector.
The ASM statistics are based on a survey that includes both a mail and nonmail components. The mail portion of the survey is comprised of a probability sample of approximately 50,000 manufacturing establishments from a frame of approximately 128,000 establishments. These 128,000 establishments are comprised of manufacturing establishments of multiunit companies (companies with operations at more than one location) and large single-location manufacturing companies. The nonmail component is comprised of the remaining small and medium-sized single-location companies, approximately 218,000. No data are collected from companies in the nonmail component. Data are directly obtained from the administrative records of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Social Security Administration (SSA), and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The nonmail companies account for 63 percent of the population and for less than 7 percent of the manufacturing output.
Starting with the 2008 ASM, the following items will be added to the MA-10000(L) and MA-10000(S) forms: Depreciation charges for all capital expenditures and Rental Payments.
2. Needs and Uses
This survey is an integral part of the Government's statistical program. Its results provide a factual background for decision making by the executive and legislative branches of the Federal Government. Federal agencies use the annual survey's input and output data as benchmarks for their statistical programs, including the Federal Reserve Board's Index of Industrial Production and the Bureau of Economic Analysis' estimates of the gross domestic product (GDP). The data also provide the Department of Energy with primary information on the use of energy by the manufacturing sector to produce manufactured products. These data also are used as benchmark data for the Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS), which is conducted for the Department of Energy by the Census Bureau. The Department of Commerce uses the exports of manufactured products data to measure the importance of exports to the manufacturing economy of each state. Within the Census Bureau, the ASM data are used to benchmark and reconcile monthly and quarterly data on manufacturing production and inventories.
The ASM is the only source of complete establishment statistics for the programs mentioned above.
The ASM furnishes up-to-date estimates of employment and payrolls, hours and wages of production workers, value added by manufacture, cost of materials, value of shipments by class of product, inventories, cost of employer’s fringe benefits, operating expenses, and expenditures for new and used plant and equipment. The survey provides data for most of these items for all 5-digit and selected 6-digit industries as defined in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). We also provide geographic data by state at a more aggregated industry level.
The survey also provides valuable information to private companies, research organizations, and trade associations. Industry makes extensive use of the annual figures on product class shipments at the U.S. level in its market analysis, product planning, and investment planning. State development/planning agencies rely on the survey as a major source of comprehensive economic data for policymaking, planning, and administration.
The Ownership or Control forms will be used to update the Business Register, the basic sampling frame for many of our current surveys. This enables us to update establishments in the Census Bureau’s Business Register that are incorrectly identified as being single-establishment firms.
Information quality is an integral part of the pre-dissemination review of information disseminated by the Census Bureau (fully described in the Census Bureau’s Information Quality Guidelines) at: http://www.census.gov/quality/quality_guidelines.htm. Data quality is also integral to information collections conducted by the Census Bureau and is incorporated into the clearance process required by the Paperwork Reduction Act.
3. Use of Information Technology
Companies may satisfy their reporting requirement for this information collection by providing data in electronic formats, via the Internet using standards prescribed by the Census Bureau. As further use of improved information technology continues, the Census Bureau will offer additional options in the field of electronic data reporting.
4. Efforts to Identify Duplication
The Census Bureau makes a concentrated effort on a continuing basis to investigate possible duplications both within the agency and outside the agency and to eliminate them whenever possible. For example, some of our Current Industrial Reports (CIR) surveys collect detailed product data, whereas we collect only the summary product class data in the ASM. Consolidation of this information would require a significant expansion either to collect product shipments on Form MA-10000 or to collect establishment detail on the related CIR reports, neither of which is practical.
One of the key features of the ASM is the ability, with OMB approval, to add and delete questions based on the importance of the economic situation at the time. In the past, we have added questions to the ASM form such as exports, age of plant, fuel consumed by type, and so forth. If it was not for this feature, these data items would need to be collected in separate surveys.
The Congress granted the Census Bureau limited access to the information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and SSA files. The Census Bureau uses this information in lieu of mailing reports to many small businesses. Thus, we obtain from IRS and SSA many of the data items businesses maintain in their records to pay income and social security taxes.
Other items, such as the cost of materials, are not identical to information requested by IRS. Even though there are similarities in the requested data, IRS does not insist on consistency and accuracy of each entry on the tax form as long as the taxable net income and the taxes paid are correct. Furthermore, IRS will accept a figure on the cost of goods sold that includes labor as well as materials and supplies used. However, the Census Bureau requires consistency in the data from firm to firm in order to publish valid statistical aggregations.
5. Minimizing Burden
The ASM excludes small and medium-sized single-location companies from the mail portion of the survey. As a result, about 218,000 establishments (approximately 63 percent of the manufacturing universe) are excluded from the sampling frame used to select the ASM mail panel. This is significantly higher than previous cycles of the survey and is motivated by the desire to reduce the reporting burden on this segment of the universe. In addition, small firms that are included in the mail portion of the survey are sent short forms, MA-10000(S) to minimize reporting burden. See Section B.1 for more detail. No sample is selected from the nonmail stratum; information for these establishments is obtained from other Federal agencies and incorporated in the published estimates. While the overall reporting burden for the ASM would not be reduced, it would be directed away from the smallest companies in the population.
6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection
The manufacturing sector is of vital importance to the Nation's well being. Consequently, current information regarding the changing structure of manufacturing is extremely important to our economic growth. The Congress recognized that fact when it authorized the changeover from the biennial census program to the quinquennial economic census covering the manufacturing sector with an ASM in interim years. Less frequent collection of the data would adversely affect our ability to recognize and react to changes in the economy.
7. Special Circumstances
This information collection will be conducted in a manner consistent with OMB guidelines and there are no special circumstances.
8. Consultations Outside the Agency
Consultations are held on a continuing basis with other government agencies, trade associations, private research groups, and companies for our general statistics items (Attachment A). The revised 2008 ASM forms were posted to the Internet for review and comment. We received no comments.
Further, we published a notice in the Federal Register (73FR, page 14,203) on March 17, 2008 inviting public comment on our plans to submit this request. We received two comments, one from the Bureau of Economic Analysis in support of our collection efforts and the other the Census Bureau deemed irrelevant to the collection.
9. Paying Respondents
The Census Bureau does not pay respondents or provide gifts in return for complying with the ASM.
10. Assurance of Confidentiality
The report forms for this information collection will give respondents the following assurance of confidentiality:
YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW. Title 13, United States Code, requires businesses and other organizations that receive this questionnaire to answer the questions and return the report to the Census Bureau. By the same law, YOUR CENSUS REPORT IS CONFIDENTIAL. It may be seen only by persons sworn to uphold the confidentiality of Census Bureau information and may be used only for statistical purposes. Further, copies retained in respondents' files are immune from legal process.
Similar guarantees will be included in the cover letter (Attachment B) that accompanies the report forms (Attachment C). The statutory basis for these assurances of confidentiality is Title 13, USC, Section 9. All activities relating to the collection and dissemination of economic census data satisfy requirements of this law.
11. Justification for Sensitive Questions
This information collection asks no questions of a sensitive nature.
12. Estimate of Hour Burden
The response burden for the 2008 ASM is estimated to be 177,400 work hours. This is based on two factors: (1) the number of respondents who receive each type of report form, and (2) the average time required to complete each form.
Overall respondent burden is estimated as follows:
Forms 1/ Number of Average Time Annual
Respondents to Complete Burden Hours
(Hours)
a. MA-10000(L) 47,000 3.68 172,960
b. MA-10000(S) 3,000 1.38 4,140
c. Ownership or Control 15,000 .02 300
_______ _______ _________
Total 65,000 N/A 177,400
1/These forms are described in more detail in Section B.2 (a).
We base the estimate of the average time required to complete the reports on discussions with many representatives of large and small companies. Respondents have reported the data included in this annual survey with no major difficulty for many years. As determined in the 1989 Recordkeeping Practices Survey, the data are readily available from respondents' records.
The estimated annual cost to respondents is approximately $5,174,758. We base the annual cost on an average hourly wage of $29.17 times the annual burden hours 177,400. The average hourly wage is that of a level 5 accountant.
13. Estimate of Cost Burden
We do not expect respondents to incur any costs other than that of their time to respond. The information requested is of the type and scope normally carried in company records and no special hardware or accounting software or system is necessary to provide answers to this information collection. Therefore, respondents are not expected to incur any capital and start-up costs or system maintenance costs in responding. Further, purchasing of outside accounting or information collection services, if performed by the respondent, is part of usual and customary business practices and not specifically required for this information collection.
14. Cost to Federal Government
We estimate the total cost to the Government for the ASM program to which these forms relate to be $7,210,318 in fiscal year 2009 all borne by the Census Bureau.
Reason for Change in Burden
This collection is being submitted as re-instatement with the following changes:
Added the following items to the MA-10000(L) and the MA-10000(S):
Item 13C, Depreciation charges for all capital equipment
Item 14, Rental Payments
16. Project Schedule
We will mail the report forms at the end of each year, with the collection phase completed during the summer of that year. Analytical review of the data will take place in the fall each year. We will publish the basic results starting at the beginning of the subsequent year. The data will be issued within 10 to 15 months after the end of the annual reporting period.
Timetable for the 2008 Annual Survey of Manufactures
Activity Start1/ End1/
Extract mailing list from Business
Register . . . 10/2008 11/2008
Prepare mailing packages 10/2008 12/2008
Mail questionnaires 12/2008 12/2008
Follow-up for nonresponse 02/2009 07/2009
Receive and check in responses 01/2009 08/2009
Perform data entry 02/2009 08/2009
Close out data collection 08/2009 08/2009
Receive, process administrative records 05/2009 09/2009
Edit data, resolve edit problems 02/2009 08/2009
Prepare and analyze tabulations (includes
the dissemination of survey results) 10/2009 12/2009
_____________________________________________________
1/ All dates are approximate
17. Request to Not Display Expiration Date
The assigned expiration date will be displayed on all report forms used in this information collection.
18. Exceptions to the Certification
There are no exceptions to the certification on the back of the Form OMB 83-I.
19. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes Affected
For the 2008 ASM, the survey will provide data for all of the 5-digit and selected 6-digit industries as defined in the NAICS. We also provide geographic data by state at a more aggregated industry level.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Statement |
| Author | allen001 |
| Last Modified By | quash001 |
| File Modified | 2008-07-01 |
| File Created | 2008-06-23 |