1018-AK guide Supporting Statement A.rtf

1018-AK guide Supporting Statement A.rtf

Alaska Guide Service Evaluation

OMB: 1018-0141

Document [rtf]
Download: rtf | pdf

Supporting Statement A for

Paperwork Reduction Act Submission


OMB Control Number 1018-XXXX


ALASKA GUIDE SERVICE EVALUATION

FWS FORM 3-2349



Terms of Clearance. Not Applicable–-this is a new collection.


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.


We are proposing to collect information to help us evaluate commercial guide services on our national wildlife refuges in the State of Alaska (State). The National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 668dd-ee), authorizes us to permit uses, including commercial visitor services, on national wildlife refuges when we find the activity to be compatible with the purposes for which the refuge was established. With the objective of making available a variety of quality visitor services for wildlife-dependent recreation on National Wildlife Refuge System lands, we issue permits for commercial guide services, including big game hunting, sport fishing, wildlife viewing, river trips, and other guided activities. We plan to use FWS Form 3-2349 (Alaska Guide Service Evaluation) as a method to:


(1) Monitor the quality of services provided by commercial guides.

(2) Gauge client satisfaction with the services.

(3) Assess the impacts of the activity on refuge resources.


The information that we plan to collect, in combination with State-required guide activity reports and contacts with guides and clients in the field, will provide a comprehensive method for monitoring permitted commercial guide activities. A regular program of client evaluation will help refuge managers detect potential problems with guide services so that we can take corrective actions promptly. In addition, we will use this information during the competitive selection process for big game and sport fishing guides to evaluate an applicant’s ability to provide a quality guiding service.


2. Indicate how, by whom, how frequently, and for what purpose the information is to be used. If the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to support information that will be disseminated to the public, explain how the collection complies with all applicable Information Quality Guidelines.


The client is the best source of information on the quality of commercial guiding services. The information that we plan to collect includes:


  • Client name

  • Guide name(s)

  • Type of guided activity

  • Dates and location of guided activity

  • Information on the services received such as the client’s expectations, safety, environmental impacts, and client’s overall satisfaction.

We will encourage respondents to provide any additional comments that they wish regarding the guide service or refuge experience, and ask whether or not they wish to be contacted for additional information.


We will collect this information from clients identified on the guide activity reports. We will collect the information only once after conclusion of the guided activity. We will mail FWS Form 3-2349 to clients and ask them to complete and return the form via mail, e-mail, facsimile, or in person to the refuge office. We will also accept responses over the phone. The form will also be available on the Service’s forms website in a fillable and printable format.


The information collected will normally remain with the appropriate refuge office. However, we may provide the information to Federal or State law enforcement agencies, or State licensing authorities as warranted. We will not release any information to the public except as required under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden [and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements.].


FWS Form 3-2349 will be available on the Service’s forms web page. We will accept completed forms via e-mail. However, we only expect to receive about 10 percent of the responses electronically.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.


This information collection is specific to the client’s experience with the guiding services received. No other office/agency collects this information.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe the methods used to minimize burden.


This information collection is directed toward individuals who are clients of guiding services, and not small businesses or other small entities.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


If we do not collect this information, we would have difficulty monitoring the quality and effectiveness of guide services permitted on national wildlife refuges. By relying only on the occasional unsolicited feedback from clients, the refuge manager cannot evaluate a guide’s performance with any degree of certainty. We will collect this information only once upon conclusion of the guided activity.



7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

* requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

* requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

* requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

* in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

* requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

* that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

* requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


There are no special circumstances that require us to collect this information in a manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines.


8. Provide the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice (or in response to a PRA statement) and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. [Please list the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of persons contacted.]


On January 22, 2008, we published in the Federal Register (73 FR 3752) a notice of our intent to request that OMB approve this information collection. In that notice, we solicited comments for 60 days, ending on March 24, 2008. We received one comment, which did not address issues surrounding the proposed collection of information. The commenter objected to the issuing of permits for guided hunting services on national wildlife refuges. We did not make any changes to our information collection requirements as a result of this comment.


Because this is a new information collection, we did not conduct additional outreach activities. At this time, we are not able to identify potential respondents (clients).


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


We will not provide payment or gifts to respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


We will not provide any assurance of confidentiality to respondents. We will maintain names, addresses, phone numbers, or other information that could identify the respondent or another individual in accordance with requirements of the Privacy Act (5 USC 552a).


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


We will not ask questions of a sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.


We estimate that we will receive 396 responses totaling 99 burden hours. We estimate the annual dollar value of the burden hours to be $3,408.17.


We expect to provide a total of 660 evaluation forms to clients each year, based on 110 guide permits with an average of six clients per guide permit each year. We believe that 396 clients (60 percent) will complete and return the evaluation form, because they have a significant investment in the guide service. The requested information consists of 10 questions, none of which requires special information gathering. We estimate that the completion time per response will be 15 minutes, for a total annual burden of 99 hours.


We estimate the total dollar value of the burden on the public to be $3,408.17. The majority of the clients will reside in States outside Alaska, and we expect that they will have a slightly higher than average income level. Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics wage calculator (www.bls.gov), the June 2005 hourly rate for all white collar occupations (excluding sales) is $24.59. We multiplied this rate by 1.4 to account for benefits (BLS news release USDL 07-1883, December 11, 2007), resulting in a total hourly cost factor of $34.43.


ACTIVITY/REQUIREMENT

ANNUAL NO. OF RESPONDENTS

TOTAL ANNUAL RESPONSES

COMPLETION TIME PER RESPONSE

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN HRS

TOTAL BURDEN COST TO PUBLIC

($34.43/HR)

FWS Form 3-2349

396

396

15 minutes

99 hrs

$3,408.17


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [nonhour] cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information.


There is no nonhour cost burden to respondents associated with this information collection.


14. Provide estimates of annualized costs to the Federal Government.


We estimate the total annual cost to the Federal Government for this information collection to be $5,307. We expect that 14 refuge headquarters offices will distribute an average of 47 evaluation forms and process an average of 28 responses per year. For each office, this would require 8 hours of processing time by a GS-11/1 employee, for a total of 112 hours. Salary rate for a GS-11/1 is $23.07 per hour (source OPM Salary Table-2008 GS). Hourly rate including COLA (24 percent) and benefits (salary plus COLA multiplied by 1.5 as per BLS news release USDL 07-1883, December 11, 2007) is $42.92. Total salary cost is $4,807 ($42.92 x 112 hours) In addition to salary costs, we estimate approximately $500 for printing and mailing evaluation forms.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.


This is a new information collection


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


This information collection will not be subject to statistical analysis and will not be published. The information is solely for the benefit of the refuge manager in monitoring permitted commercial guiding activities on the refuge.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


We will display the OMB control number and expiration date..


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions," of OMB Form 83-I.


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


File Typetext/rtf
File TitleSupporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission
AuthorAnissa Craghead
Last Modified ByU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
File Modified2008-06-23
File Created2008-05-19

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy