A IN/RF ISO Tag Manufacturer Application
for Bison and Cattle
Cover Sheet
Primary Information |
||
Name of Company: |
|
|
Contact Person Name: |
|
|
Address: |
|
|
|
|
|
City, State, ZIP: |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonproducer Participant Number: |
|
|
Phone: |
|
|
Fax: |
|
|
Email of Contact Person: |
|
|
Company Web site (url): |
|
|
|
||
Information Technology Contact Person IT Contact is your designated person that the NAIS IT Team will contact regarding information system issues.
|
||
Name of IT Contact: |
|
|
Phone # of IT Contact: |
|
|
Email for IT Contact: |
|
|
Manufacturing Plant Information if different from above |
||
Company Name: |
|
|
Contact Name: |
|
|
Address: |
|
|
City, Province: |
|
|
Country: |
|
|
Phone: |
|
|
Fax: |
|
|
Email: |
|
AIN/RF ISO Tag Manufacturer Application for Bison and Cattle
Complete a separate application for each product type.
Prequalification: ICAR Information
An ICAR Manufacture code and ICAR Product Code are required for the submission to be considered a valid application.
Manufacturer Number: _________________
ICAR Product Code: __________________
What is the company’s role regarding the tag being applied for?
___ Manufacturing and Imprinting
___ Imprinting only
Do you plan to be an AIN Tag Manager? Yes/No ____
Manufacturer Product Labels
Manufacturer Product Name: __________________________________
Manufacturer Product Code Number: ____________________________
Tag Visual Performance Requirements and Description
Please provide written explanation describing how the device meets each characteristic (see Appendix, Table 1 for the specifications).
One Time Use - Tamper evident locking mechanism
Explain how the tag is constructed and designed for one-time use (tamper evident). Be sure to clearly explain how the tag cannot be removed from one animal and reapplied to another animal without evidence that this action has occurred.
Unalterable printing
Readability (No explanation necessary, see VI for submitting samples.)
Tag loss rates
Expected tag life
Tag toxicity and animal injury
Tag deterioration
Tag plasticity
Tag Coupling/tensile strength
Tag abrasion resistance
RFID Requirements for ISO 11784 and 11785 Compliant Devices
ISO Compliant (previously listed)
Electronic Read Rates and Ranges
Laboratory
The applicant must provide information provided by an independent 3rd party documenting the device meets or exceeds the requirements of the laboratory test as described in Appendix A, Table 1. A minimum of 25 tags is required for this evaluation. Be sure that the test is fully documented and include the contact person of the 3rd party that conducted the test.
Field Environment
The applicant must provide information provided by an independent 3rd party documenting that the device meets or exceeds the field environment test as described in Appendix A, Table 1. A minimum of 300 observations using at least 100 RFID tags is required. Be sure that the test is fully documented and include the contact person of the 3rd party that conducted the test.
Note: The read range evaluation criteria is established to authorize AIN/RF Tags as “USDA Approval Pending” for the voluntary phase of NAIS. Criteria for “USDA Approved” will require significantly more tags in the evaluation
Expected tag life
Transponder Security
Transponder failure rates
Printing Criteria - Visual Readability
Provide 25 samples of the applied for tag, with imprinting as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.
Manufacturer’s Production Capacity
Bi-weekly production capacity for applied for tag: _______
Anticipated inventory requirements for this tag: ______
Technology
HDX or FDX: _______________________________
Activation Frequency: ______________________________
Tag Description
AIN/RF Tags are two-piece tags, commonly referred to as the male and female tag. For describing the characteristics of the tag, the component that encases the transponder (or has it adhered to it) is referred to as “tag piece A” and the tag component without the transponder is referred to as “tag piece B.” Tag piece A, is attached to the inside the animal’s ear and the tag piece B is on the outside of the animal’s ear.
Tag Piece A:
Weight: _________
Shape: __ Strip __ Button (round) __ Panel (“flap tag)
Size: Length (if square or rectangle): _____ mm and Width: ______mm
Diameter (if round): _____ mm
Height: ___ mm (i.e., top of locking mechanism to flat side of the tag)
Weight: ___ grams
Primary materials used to manufacture the tag: ___________________
Tag Piece B:
Weight: _________
Shape: __ Strip __ Button (round) __ Panel (“flap tag)
Size: Length: _____ cm Width: ______cm
Primary materials used to manufacture the tag: ___________________
Stem
Length: _____ cm
Newton value at which the stem breaks: _________
Other Species
What other species do you recommend this tag for?
__ Sheep/Goats __ Pigs
__ Other (Please list) _____________________________________________
Quality Control Program
Attach your company’s quality control plan and any other documentation of your ability to produce the tag consistently according to the specifications. Include procedures that will ensure the uniqueness of the AIN is maintained.
Tag applicators
Provide two applicators used to apply the tag and indicate if the tagger functions with other devices (tag from other manufacturers).
Other
Please list the National Identification Programs of other countries in which this tag is currently an approved tag.
Table A. |
|
|
|
Country |
Date Approved |
Country |
Date Approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix A.
Table 1. |
AIN Tag – Requirements and Description |
Performance Requirements |
|
A. One-time use |
The tag must be designed for one-time use (tamper evident) making it impossible to remove and re-apply the tag without visual evidence of tampering |
B. Unalterable |
The printing on the tag may not be readily altered. |
C. Readability |
The national identification number must be easily and reliably readable. The printing and color contrast of the U.S. Shield, lettering, and numbers are to be readable at a distance of 30 inches (0.75 m). |
D. Tag loss rates |
On average, when applied in a manner approved by the manufacturer, not more than 1% of tags applied will be lost in the year following application or in any year thereafter under normal field conditions over the expected life of the tag. |
E. Expected tag life |
The minimum time that a tag shall be expected to remain on an animal in a functional state (physically) is for the expected life of the animal. |
F. Tag toxicity and animal injury |
Tags shall do no harm to animal or affect its health or well-being. Tags will not cause chemical contamination of meat or edible offal or damage the hide. |
G. Tag deterioration |
There will be no diffusion of colorant from tags. There will be no apparent physical deterioration (other than color) due to detrimental effects to UV light, rain, heat (45C) and cold (-30C) or other environmental influences such as chemicals, mud, urine, and manure for at least 5 years of wear. |
H. Tag plasticity |
Devices will not split or crack under normal use. |
I. Tag coupling/tensile strength |
Tag coupling/tensile strength: Evaluation standards conform to ICAR testing standards and at minimum must comply with ISO standards 37 and 527. |
J. Tag abrasion resistance
|
Tag abrasion resistance: Tag shall not exhibit damage or change due to wear and will be subjected to ICAR testing standards and at minimum ISO standard 9352 |
Description of Printing |
|
|
Table 2: Bovine and Cattle AIN/RF ISO Tag Standards
The following chart provides the standards for AIN/RF ISO Tags that are in addition to those listed in Table 1.
Table 2. |
Bovine and Cattle AIN/RF ISO Tag Standards |
|
A. ISO Compliant |
All transponders must be certified by ICAR for conformance with ISO-11784 and 11785. |
|
B. Electronic Read Rates and Ranges
|
In a laboratory with a neutral electromagnetic environment: 100 percent read rate in best orientation at 24 inches (60 cm) in a stationary test and a moving test of 1 m/sec over a passage length of at least 20 inches (50 cm). In a field test environment: Transponders must be reliably machine read without regard to orientation by a standardized dual HDX/FDX reader, as cattle move by in a single file passage moving at 4 mph (1m/sec) with a read rate of 95 percent. |
|
C. Expected tag life |
The minimum time that a tag shall be expected to remain functional (electronically) is for the expected life of the animal. |
|
D. Transponder security |
The official number encoded within each transponder must not be able to be altered and must be contained within the tag. Tags will be tamper-evident and impossible to unseal without visible evidence of tampering. |
|
E. Transponder failure rates |
The transponder within the tag shall be reliable and machine-readable for the expected lifetime of the animal. |
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | AIN Tag Manufacturer Application |
Author | nehammerschmidt |
Last Modified By | kahardy |
File Modified | 2008-10-16 |
File Created | 2008-10-16 |