The Efficacy of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) and its Associated Training on Differentiated Instruction and Student Achievement

ICR 200710-1850-002

OMB: 1850-0850

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form and Instruction
New
Form and Instruction
New
Supplementary Document
2008-01-17
Supplementary Document
2007-10-19
Supporting Statement B
2008-01-29
Supporting Statement A
2008-01-29
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
1850-0850 200710-1850-002
Historical Active
ED/IES 3419
The Efficacy of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) and its Associated Training on Differentiated Instruction and Student Achievement
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved with change 01/30/2008
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/24/2007
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2011 36 Months From Approved
252 0 0
8,862 0 0
0 0 0

The Department of Education’s Institute for Education Sciences has commissioned this evaluation as a response to the current need for experimental research about the impacts of formative assessment on student achievement and teacher practice. This project will assess the efficacy of the Northwest Evaluation Association’s program entitled “Measuring Academic Progress” or MAP by looking at the impact on teacher practice and student achievement. The MAP intervention combines theory and research in two areas that have gained considerable attention in recent years: (1) formative assessment: (2) and differentiated instruction. MAP tests and training are currently in place in more than 10% of K-12 school districts nationwide (just over 2,000 districts participate among the approximately 17,500 districts). Despite its popularity, the effectiveness of the MAP and its training have not been established to date. Furthermore, the relative ubiquity of its current use, along with a projected growth in the number of schools investing in MAP and its associated training, makes it a prime candidate for this type of study.

PL: Pub.L. 107 - 279 174 Name of Law: Education Science Reform Act of 2001
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  72 FR 151 08/07/2007
72 FR 205 10/24/2007
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 252 0 0 252 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 8,862 0 0 8,862 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new Collection

$97,129
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Ok-Choon Park 202 208-3951

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/24/2007


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy