Supporting Statement / Justification for Telephone Interviews
CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
We have observed through our audit work that there are a number of business taxpayers that have not benefited from the Telephone Excise Tax Refund offered in Tax Year 2007. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had exhibited substantial effort to make taxpayers aware of the excise tax refund. The IRS developed an internal communications strategy, a comprehensive media strategy, and the IRS Refund of Telephone Excise Tax Outreach Plan. However, even with all of their efforts there appear to be a number of qualified business taxpayers that did not request the refund on their 2007 tax return.
In 1997, changes made by telecom companies in billing models (i.e., charging for minutes and not distance) meant that portions of the collected taxes no longer met the requirements of the tax code1. Several businesses litigated the taxability of these portions of the Telephone Excise Tax and, after five circuit court losses, the IRS conceded the issue. The IRS, accordingly, has implemented a major program for taxpayers to receive refunds for the portion of their telephone excise tax paid on long-distance service billed after February 28, 2003 and before August 1, 2006, that did not meet the statutory taxability requirements.
USE OF DATA
Information obtained though the telephone interviews will be used to determine why business taxpayers did not request the Telephone Excise Tax Refund and what the IRS could have done differently to notify them of this refund for which they were qualified to receive. This information will help the IRS to learn how to best notify taxpayers of changes to the tax code.
USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN
NOT APPLICABLE
EFFORT TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
We have researched current and prior TIGTA audits and have found no other collections gathering the same or similar information.
METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES
The telephone calls will be kept brief and will allow the taxpayer to offer their opinions of the best methods to inform them of changes.
CONSEQUENCE TO FEDERAL PROGRAM OR POLICY ACTIVITIES IF COLLECTION IS NOT CONDUCTED
If the collection of this data is not conducted, it will preclude us from providing insight on actions that could be taken to better educate taxpayers and tax practitioners of tax law changes.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTANT WITH OMB GUIDELINES
All information collected though the use of confirmation letters will be conducted in a manner consistent with 5 C.F.R. 1320.8(d).
CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
Not Applicable
EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS
Not Applicable
ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Assurance of confidentiality will be communicated to the taxpayer during the telephone conversation in compliance with the Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.
JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
Not Applicable
ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
The basis for the average number of hours per response is based on the interview questionnaire. Each questionnaire gathers information from the taxpayers concerning the Telephone Excise Tax Refund. We will contact approximately 385 taxpayers and estimate the calls to take from 5 to 15 minutes; therefore our total estimated burden time is 65 hours.
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
Expenditures for capital or start-up costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information will not be required.
ESTIMATED ANNULIED COSTS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
We estimate that the annual costs for telephone interviews to cost the government less than $100.
REASONS FOR PROGRAM CHANES OR ADJUSTMENTS
Not Applicable
PLANS FOR TABULATION STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION
The collection of information will occur between July and September. A report containing the results of our telephone interview program will be published and distributed in November 2007 to the appropriate IRS officials.
REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE
Not Applicable
EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I
Not Applicable
1 Five circuit court cases have held that a telephonic communication for which there is a toll charge that varies with elapsed transmission time and not distance (time only service) is not taxable toll telephone service as defined in Section 4252(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Supporting Statement / Justification for Telephone Interviews |
Author | L Jeff Anderson |
Last Modified By | Joseph P. Ananka |
File Modified | 2007-08-14 |
File Created | 2007-08-14 |