PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION
Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency=s Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement, and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503 |
|
1. Agency/Subagency originating request
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
2. OMB control number b. [ ] None
a. _1__ _9__ _0__ _2__ - _0_ _1_ _2_ _8_ ___ ___ ___ ___ |
3. Type of information Collection (check one) a. [ ] New Collection b. [x ]Revision of a currently approved collection c. [ ] Extension of a currently approved collection d. [ ] Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. [ ]Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number
For b-f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement instructions |
4. Type of review requested (check one) a. [x ] Regular b. [ ] Emergency - Approval requested by: _/_/_ c. G Delegated
5. Small entities Will this information collection have any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes [x] No
6. Requested expiration date a. [x ] Three years from approval date b. [ ] Other Specify: __/ _/_ _ |
7. Title Gas Pipeline Certificates: Environmental Impact Statement, RM06-7-000 Final Rule |
|
8. Agency form numbers(s) (if applicable) FERC-577 |
|
9. Keywords 'gas pipeline operations, environmental impact reports' |
|
10. Abstract : Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Final Rule RM06-7-000 amending its Part 157, Subpart F, blanket certification regulations to expand the scope and scale of activities that may be undertaken in accordance with blanket authority. FERC is expanding the types of natural gas projects permitted under blanket authority and to increase the cost limits that apply to blanket projects. In addition, FERC clarifies that a natural gas company is not necessarily engaged in unduly discriminatory practice if it charges different customers different rates for the same service based on the date that customers commit to service. |
|
11. Affected public (Mark primary with AP@ and all others that apply with AX@) a. _ __ Individuals or household d. ___ Farms b. _P_ Business or other for-profit e. _x__ Federal Government c. ___ Not-for-profit institutions f. x_State, Local or Tribal Government |
12. Obligation to respond (Mark primary with AP@ and all others that apply with AX@) a. [ ] Voluntary b. [ ] Required to obtain or retain benefits c. [x ] Mandatory |
13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 76 b. Total annual responses 1,218 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 30% c. Total annual hours requested 235,689 d. Current OMB inventory 247,686 e. Difference 11,997 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change -11,997 2. Adjustment |
14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden (in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs (O&M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 0 |
15. Purpose of information collection (mark primary with AP@ and all others that apply with AX@) a. __ Application for benefits e. _ __ Program planning or management b. _x_ Program evaluation f. ___ Research c. ___ General purpose statistics g. _ P_ Regulatory or compliance d. ___ Audit |
16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting (check all that apply) a. [ ] Recordkeeping b. G Third party disclosure c. [ x ] Reporting 1. [x ] On occasion 2. [ ]Weekly 3. [ ]Monthly 4. [ ]Quarterly 5. [ ]Semi-annually 6. [ ] Annually 7. [ ] Biennially 8. [ ]Other (describe) |
17. Statistical Methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?
[ ] Yes [x] No |
18. Agency contact (person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission)
Name: John Leiss
Phone: (202)502-8058 |
OMB 83-I 10/95
19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.
NOTE: The test of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b) (3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set froth in the instructions.
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers; (a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions; (b) It avoids unnecessary duplication; (c) It reduces burden on small entities; (d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents; (e) Its implementations will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices; (f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements; (g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3): (i) Why the information is being collected; (ii) Use of information; (iii) Burden estimate; (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number. (h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected (see note in Item 19 of the instructions); (i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and (j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.
Item no. 19 (g) (vi) See item no. 17 of Supporting Statement. Item no. 19 (i). See Item no. 18 of the Supporting Statement
|
|
Signature of Senior Official or designee (signed)
Michael P. Miller, Information Clearance Officer, FERC |
Date
|
OMB 83-I 10/95
File Type | application/msword |
Author | Mpmed12 |
Last Modified By | Michael Miller |
File Modified | 2006-10-25 |
File Created | 2006-10-19 |