FR Notice 60 Days

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Serially Numbered
Substantial Holders or Containers
Notice and request for
comments.

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

ACTION:

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on an information
collection requirement concerning the
Serially Numbered Substantial Holders
or Containers. This request for comment
is being made pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)).
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before October 16, 2006,
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to the Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection, Information Services Group,
Room 3.2.C, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20229.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection, Attn.:
Tracey Denning, Room 3.2.C, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20229, Tel. (202) 344–
1429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13;
44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments
should address: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e)
estimates of capital or start-up costs and
costs of operations, maintenance, and
purchase of services to provide
information. The comments that are
submitted will be summarized and
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:36 Aug 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record. In this
document CBP is soliciting comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Serially Numbered Substantial
Holders or Containers.
OMB Number: 1651–0035.
Form Number: N/A.
Abstract: Free clearance is permitted
for serially numbered holders or
containers of foreign manufacture if the
owner of the container places certain
markings on them in accordance with
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
Current Actions: There are no changes
to the information collection. This
submission is being submitted to extend
the expiration date.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Businesses,
Institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 4.5
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 90.
Estimated Total Annualized Cost on
the Public: N/A.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, Information
Services Branch.
[FR Doc. E6–13527 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITE
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Application for Foreign Trade
Zone Admission and/or Status
Transaction, Application for Foreign
Trade Zone Activity Report
Notice and request for
comments.

ACTION:

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on an information
collection requirement concerning the
Application for Foreign Trade Zone
Admission and/or Status Transaction,
Application for Foreign Trade Zone
Activity Report. This request for
comment is being made pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)).

PO 00000

Frm 00031

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

47509

Written comments should be
received on or before October 16, 2006,
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Customs and Border Protection,
Information Services Branch, Room
3.2.C, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20229.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Customs and
Border Protection, Attn.: Tracey
Denning, Room 3.2.C, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20229, Tel. (202) 344–
1429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13;
44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments
should address: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e)
estimates of capital or start-up costs and
costs of operations, maintenance, and
purchase of services to provide
information. The comments that are
submitted will be summarized and
included in the CBP request for Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record. In this
document CBP is soliciting comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Application for Foreign Trade
Zone Admission and/or Status
Transaction, Application for Foreign
Trade Zone Activity Report.
OMB Number: 1515–0086.
Form Number: CBP Forms 214, 214A,
214B, 214C, and 216.
Abstract: CBP Forms 214, 214A, 214B,
and 214C, Application for ForeignTrade Zone Admission and/or Status
Designation, are used by business firms
which bring merchandise into a foreign
trade zone, to register the admission of
such merchandise to zones and to apply
for the appropriate zone status.
Current Actions: There are no changes
to the information collection. This
submission is being submitted to extend
the expiration date.
DATES:

E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM

17AUN1

47510

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices

Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Businesses,
Individuals, Institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
325,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 14
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 79,500.
Estimated Total Annualized Cost on
the Public: N/A.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, Information
Services Branch.
[FR Doc. E6–13528 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Great Dismal Swamp and Nansemond
National Wildlife Refuges: Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) announces that the
final Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) is available for Great Dismal
Swamp and Nansemond National
Wildlife Refuges (NWR). Prepared in
conformance with the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife System Improvement Act of
1997, and the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, the plan describes
how the Service intends to manage the
refuges over the next 15 years. A
Finding of No Significant Impact was
approved by the Regional Director.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the CCP is
available on compact diskette or in hard
copy, and may be obtained by writing
Deloras Freeman, Great Dismal Swamp
NWR, 3100 Desert Road, Suffolk,
Virginia 23434, or by e-mail at
deloras_freeman@fws.gov. This
document may also be accessed at the
Web address http://library.fws.gov/
ccps.htm.

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deloras Freeman, Refuge Planner at the
above address, by phone at 757–986–
3705, or by e-mail at
deloras_freeman@fws.gov.
The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:36 Aug 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd et seq.), requires the Service to
develop a CCP for each refuge within
the system. The purpose of developing
a CCP is to provide refuge managers
with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing
toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with
sound principles of fish and wildlife
science, conservation, legal mandates,
and Service policies. In addition to
outlining broad management direction
on conserving wildlife and habitats, a
CCP identifies wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities available to
the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation
and photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. The CCP
will be reviewed and updated at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1969, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, and the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347, as
amended).
Established in 1974, Great Dismal
Swamp NWR encompasses 111,203
acres, the largest intact remnant of a vast
habitat that once covered more than 1
million acres of southeastern Virginia
and northeastern North Carolina.
Nansemond NWR, established
December 12, 1973, is an unstaffed
satellite refuge encompassing 423 acres.
Our Final CCP includes management
direction for each of the refuges, and
details habitat management and public
use programs based on the vision for the
refuge at the time of its establishment in
1974. We have included the restoration
of 8,000 acres of Atlantic white cedar
habitat, the restoration of 10,000 acres of
red-cockaded woodpecker habitat, and
the restoration of a remnant marsh to its
original 250 acres from its present 30
acres. We would establish a neotropical
migratory bird focus area near Jericho
Lane, in which we would focus habitat
management and modeling, population
surveys, and education and
interpretation related to neotropical
migratory bird populations. We will
implement a limited bear hunt. This
hunt will occur on a total of 2 days
during November and December, with a
total maximum of 100 permits issued.
We anticipate a harvest of 11 bears with
a harvest limit target of 20 bears. If 10
or more bears are taken the first day,
various parameters will be evaluated
and the second hunt day may be
cancelled. As with the deer hunt, dogs
will not be allowed as a means to hunt
bears. The bear hunt is currently
authorized in the Code of Federal

PO 00000

Frm 00032

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Regulations (50 CFR Part 32), but has
never been implemented.
We have also targeted building
projects, such as the development of an
environmental education site at Jericho
Ditch in Suffolk, Virginia. We will also
develop an exhibit to be situated at the
downtown visitor center that is run by
the City of Suffolk. Additionally, we
propose the conversion of the current
administrative building for a concession
operation that will rent kayaks and
outdoor equipment and run tours of the
swamp, the construction of a new
visitor center and headquarters between
the old and new Route 17 in
Chesapeake, Virginia, and the
construction of new trails, observation
and photography platforms, or towers.
The CCP proposes to enhance
environmental education and outreach,
and to establish hunter safety and youth
hunting programs.
• The Service solicited comments on
the draft CCP/EA for Great Dismal
Swamp and Nansemond NWRs from
March 13 to April 24, 2006 (March 13,
2006, 71 FR 12709). We developed a list
of substantive comments that required
responses. Editorial suggestions and
notes of concurrence with or opposition
to certain proposals were noted and
included in the decision making
process, but did not receive formal
responses. The Final CCP includes
responses to all substantive comments.
Based upon comments that we
received, we have chosen management
alternative B, with the following
modifications:
• Land Protection: A number of
comments expressed support for
protection of the Great Dismal Swamp
ecosystem, including surrounding
lands. Additionally, a comment voiced
concern that the wording of Goal 3 did
not adequately reflect the refuge
purpose as stated in the Dismal Swamp
Act. The refuge addressed these
comments with the following actions:
(1) Addition of the following strategy
to Goal 3: ‘‘Develop sound working
relationships with adjoining
landowners, nearby neighboring
landowners, and other key landowners
within the ecosystem to protect the
integrity of the refuge boundary and
further the protection of the ecosystem.’’
The refuge will take advantage of
partnership opportunities around the
refuge.
(2) Goal 3 was broadened to better
reflect the intent of the enabling
legislation and reworded as: ‘‘Provide
protection and restoration of those areas
within Great Dismal Swamp ecosystem
that are remnants of the Great Dismal
Swamp and/or are restorable to Great
Dismal Swamp habitat while providing

E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM

17AUN1