Table 2
Illustrative Example of a
Promising Practice Analysis:
Head Start Oral Health Initiative
Evaluation
Approach: Parent Education |
Implementation Strategy |
|||
School-Day Class |
Evening Class |
Home Visit |
Material Sent Home |
|
Number of Grantees Using Approach |
6 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
Number of High-Performing Grantees Using Approach |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Number of Low-Performing Grantees Using Approach |
2 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
Other Relevant Information About Strategy Learned During Site Visit |
|
Attendance is real issue at classes held during evening |
|
In 2 high-performing grantees, strategy used in combination with class |
Percentage of Parents Receiving Education Among Grantees Using Strategy |
75 |
30 |
65 |
100 |
Promising Practice Assessment |
Promising |
Not promising |
Promising |
Promising, when used in combination with another strategy as done in high-performing grantees |
Rationale |
Even though 75 percent not met, a large percentage of grantees using strategy are high-performing and quantitative data agrees |
Attendance concerns; quantitative data not supporting |
No low-performing use strategy and quantitative data ok |
Data suggests combination works well but alone not sufficient. |
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | MEMORANDUM |
Author | Diane Paulsell |
Last Modified By | Diane Paulsell |
File Modified | 2007-01-06 |
File Created | 2007-01-06 |