EPA's Transportation Partners

ICR 199710-2000-001

OMB: 2000-0525

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
23455 Migrated
ICR Details
2000-0525 199710-2000-001
Historical Active 199802-2010-001
EPA
EPA's Transportation Partners
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 02/09/1998
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/16/1997
This collection of information is approved on a pilot basis for 18 months. OMB is not granting a full 3-year approval because of its concern over whether the proposed methodology for the estimat ion of greenhouse gas emission reductions attributable to the Tra nsportation Partners program is effective and efficient and stati stically appropriate for this purpose, as required by 5 CFR 1320. 9(i). If EPA wishes to continue this collection of information af ter the 18 month expiration date, it should include with its just ification for renewal a report showing how the data collected thr ough the annual Partner Profile survey was used to calculate emis sion reductions from individual projects. This report should incl ude buth the estimated reductions and the supporting data and cal culations used to derive them. OMB understands that EPA intends to base its estimation methodolo gy on the approach developed by the International Council for Loc al Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and outlined in its report: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions from Transportatio n Partners Projects. While this approach appears theoretically re asonable, OMB is concerned that its use generally requires more i nformation than the Partner Profile survey will provide. OMB unde rstands that EPA intends to supplement the survey information wit h region-specific statistics for variables such as fuel efficienc y and vehicle occupancy. While the use of non-project-specific es timates may be unavoidable, care must be taken to avoid, as much as possible, assumptions that would bias the resulting estimates in one direction or the other. The specific sample calculations p resented in the ICLEI report appear to include a number of such a ssumptions. We are particularly concerned about the characterization of basel ine activity. For example, it may not be appropriate to assume, as the ICLEI report generally does, that a new low-emissions tran sportation alternative is primarily replacing single occupancy ve hicles operating at the national average fuel efficiency. People likely to participate in voluntary programs to protect the enviro nment may already be using low-emissions transportation alternati ves or fuel efficient cars, and some of the use of the new altern ative may represent absolute increases in personal miles traveled (PMTs) rather than switching from another transportation mode. In addition, it is important to accurately reflect all of the increm ental emissions associated with a new alternative. One sample ICL EI calculation assumes that no additional greenhouse gases would be produced by new riders on a city transit system because the "s mall number" of project participants would not require any additi onal buses. This may or may not be true in an individual case but is clearly inappropriate as an analytical assumption. Another IC LEI calculation assumes that the incremental electricity required to run an expanded light rail system in San Diego, CA is "low ca rbon" (ie, produces less than half the US average CO2 emissions), because the average mix of electricity generation capacity in th e Pacific states overall includes more hydro and nuclear units th an nationally. It would be more appropriate (and should be fairly simple) to determine what the marginal generating units for San Diego would be and calculate CO2 emissions accordingly. OMB recognizes the importance of developing methodologies for pro ducing credible, unbiased estimates of greenhouse gas emission re cutions, based on reasonably available data and easy to perform c alculations. This is especially important in light of the Decembe r 1997 international agreement in Kyoto calling for an enforceabl e commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In refining the ICLEI methodology, OMB urges EPA to be particularly careful to avoid assumptions that might bias the resulting estimates in one direction or the other.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/1999 08/31/1999
195 0 0
8,371 0 0
0 0 0

The Transportation Partners program is a new, cooperative, voluntary program that seeks to reduce the growth of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through the adoption of measures that provide or promote the use of non-single occupancy vehicle transportation choices for citizens. The information collected under this ICR will be used to help assess the effectiveness of various types of VMT reduction actions on improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The respondents will be project partners in the Transportation Partners program and will include local government agencies, civic organizations,....

None
None


No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
EPA's Transportation Partners 1818.01

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 195 0 0 195 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 8,371 0 0 8,371 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
No

$0
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/16/1997


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy