Study of Consequences of Being Accused of Scientific Misconduct

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
112461	Study of Consequences of Being Accused of Scientific Misconduct	Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0937-0205	ICR Reference No: 199501-0937-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: HHS/OASH	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Study of Consequences of Being Accused of Scientific Misconduct
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 04/20/1995
	Date Received in OIRA: 01/27/1995
Terms of Clearance: This information collection request is approved under the follow- ing conditions: OASH complies with all aspects of the collection effort as described in the revised submission; revised language will replace the language in the specified sections;and the study will only proceed with a response rate in each of the supgroups (findings of no misconduct versus misconduct) at or above 50%. Analysis of information for misconduct subjects will not proceed if the responses fall below 30. OASH revised the language in specific sections of the submission to reflect the descriptive rather than scientific nature of the collection. Any characteri- zation of this effort will indicate the substantial limitations of the information. The new title of the collection will be "Description of Perceived Consequences of Being Accused of Scientific Misconduct".

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	12/31/1995	12/31/1995
Responses	112	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	56	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: 42 CFR Part 50 specifies certain treatment of accused individuals including restoration of reputation of those when allegations not confirmed. This survey will provide background information to assure institutional compliance with regulation and other information.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Study of Consequences of Being Accused of Scientific Misconduct

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	112	0	0	112	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	56	0	0	56	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 01/27/1995

---