This is a
reasonably well developed supporting statement. When this is
resubmitted for approval, EPA should explain how the burden
estimates were derived (e.g.: regional staff estimates for the
projects they process, questions asked of grantees, etc.)
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/1988
04/30/1988
675
0
0
189,000
0
0
0
0
0
INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FROM
MUNICIPALITIES APPLYING FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS AND FROM MUNICIPALITIES AND BUSINESSES SUBJECT TO NEW SOURCE
DISCHARGE STANDARDS IN NON-DELEGATED NPDES STATES. THIS INFORMATION
IS USED BY THE AGENCY TO MAKE AN APPROPRIATE NEPA DETERMINATION ON
PREFERRED AND ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.