EPA should
indicate in writing what effots it has taken or will take to insure
that future effluent guidelines are not published as proposed rules
without the concurrent submission of a request for approval of any
information requirements. When this ICR is submitted for reapproval
the burden hour estimates should be based upon actual permittee
experience. This ICR is approved for one year. When it is submitted
for reapproval, it should describe the specific information the
permitting authority will require in order to (dis)approve an
exemption as described in bullets (b) and (e) in the answer to
questio 2 of the justification statement. The guidance document
mentioned in bullet (c) of question 2 should also be submitted.
This ICR was also not in EPAs ICB exhibit 2B-new collections for FY
1985.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/1986
04/30/1986
3
0
0
9,360
0
0
0
0
0
ORE MILLS USING THE FROTH FLOTATION
PROCESS MAY REQUEST PERMISSION TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER IF NECESSARY
TO ELIMINATE INTERFERENCE IN ORE RECOVERY. APPLICANTS SUBMIT
TECHNICAL DATA ONCE TO THE PERMIT AUTHORITY (EPA OR STATE AGENCY),
WHICH REVIEWS IT AND APPROVES/DENIES THE DISCHARGE.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.